Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
62 measurements spanning 94 days, net -1,307. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,576–21,275 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Nov 2026, 13:10
19,772
-25
7 Nov 2026, 06:08
19,797
-48
6 Nov 2026, 05:30
19,845
-51
5 Nov 2026, 05:40
19,896
-40
4 Nov 2026, 01:39
19,936
-17
3 Nov 2026, 01:11
19,953
-1
1 Nov 2026, 23:51
19,954
-22
1 Nov 2026, 03:11
19,976
-13
31 Oct 2026, 01:30
19,989
-15
29 Oct 2026, 23:19
20,004
-17
29 Oct 2026, 00:51
20,021
-6
28 Oct 2026, 00:08
20,027
-13
26 Oct 2026, 21:00
20,040
+2
25 Oct 2026, 22:14
20,038
-7
25 Oct 2026, 00:16
20,045
-19
23 Oct 2026, 23:21
20,064
-8
23 Oct 2026, 00:21
20,072
-6
21 Oct 2026, 19:30
20,078
-9
20 Oct 2026, 13:20
20,087
-18
19 Oct 2026, 13:08
20,105
first reading
Engagement
43 posts held, back to 6 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 70 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.2%
avg views ÷ 19,772 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,410
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.763%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 43 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 October 2026
Posts held
43 (6 June 2026 – 30 October 2026)
Views total
16,900
Reactions total
129
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Nov 2026, 15:28 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,760
Videos
≈76
Links
≈532
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
1,686 reactions across 41 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
801
47.5%
❤
204
12.1%
🤣
181
10.7%
🤡
106
6.29%
👍
84
4.98%
😭
43
2.55%
💯
38
2.25%
🔥
33
1.96%
🫡
25
1.48%
🌚
24
1.42%
😢
21
1.25%
😱
18
1.07%
🤷♂
17
1.01%
🤝
15
0.89%
🤯
14
0.83%
🍌
7
0.415%
💊
7
0.415%
💩
7
0.415%
👨💻
5
0.297%
🙏
5
0.297%
13 further kinds
31
1.84%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 43 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,817 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 6 June 2026 to 30 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 7 posts held from the last 30 days (28.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Фактически, это все очень похоже на проблему с NFT. В блокчейн для NFT чаще всего заносится только ссылка на внешний хостинг, где хранится файл, вместо того, чтобы записывать сам файл в блокчейн
Учитывая, что даже эта проблема так до сих пор и не решена, ожидать нейросетей на блокчейне через 5-7 лет — это очень мощный оптимизм на уровне хопиума. Поживем-увидим 👍
@sokolovskyinchain
Почему AI-лихорадка прошла мимо крипторынка?
1.
Если поскрести почти каждый AI Crypto стартап, обнаружится, что токен там не особо нужен
Все операции, включая обучение и инференс моделей, происходят на внешних серверах. Блокчейн выступает лишь в роли координатора и платежного слоя. Например, в SingularityNET AI‑сервисы хостятся на обычных серверах, а блокчейн управляет их обнаружением и оплатой. Ocean Protocol хра…
🔥 Binance Kazakhstan запартнерились с Alatau City Bank и запустили сервис по прямому пополнению и выводу средств в тенге и американских долларах прямо на бирже.
Такой фиатный канал упрощает перевод средств между банковской системой и Binance Kazakhstan. При этом местные пользователи впервые получили настолько простой прямой доступ к USD.
@prometheus
⚡️ Gemini снова блокирует россиян
Пользователи массово жалуются, что не могут зайти в нейросеть. Сервис стал вычислять их даже при подключении через VPN и сразу закрывать доступ.
Durev VPN решил эту проблему ещё до того, как она появилась. Для нейросетей у нас давно есть отдельные серверы, не связанные с российским трафиком. Через них ВСЁ открывается без ограничений.
Кстати, до конца розыгрыша осталось всего 4 ДНЯ…
🔶 Запущенный всего 4 месяца назад bStocks от Binance уже достиг $1 млрд активов.
Основная торговля происходит, когда американские рынки не работают. Трейдеры хотят трейдить без режима и все чаще приходят на Binance.
bStocks — это токенизированные ценные бумаги с привязкой к реальным фиатным активам, позволяющие инвестировать в акции Tesla, Nvidia, Google и т.д. прямо через Binance.
Популярен этот инструмент, потом…
Моя жена забеременела от другого мужчины.
Последние 9 месяцев были сложными, зная, что он не мой сын, но я так взволнован тем, чтобы воспитать его как своего собственного.
Вот 9 вещей, которым эта ситуация научила меня для дальнейшего хранения альткоинов: 👇
@sokolovskyinchain
2014: Mt.Gox: около 470 миллионов долларов
2015: Bitstamp: около 5,1 миллиона долларов
2016: Bitfinex: 72 миллиона долларов
2017: NiceHash: около 64 миллионов долларов
2018: Coincheck: 534 миллиона долларов
2018: BitGrail: 170 миллионов долларов
2019: Binance: 40 миллионов долларов
2020: KuCoin: 281 миллион долларов
2021: BitMart: 196 миллионов долларов
2022: FTX: 415 миллионов долларов
2023: Poloniex: около 126 милл…
😁17🤡4🗿2
Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @sokolovskyinchain. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Prometheus 🔥 Биткоин и криптовалюты @prometheus · 38,884#1
🇷🇺 The Club 100 - Криптовалютый окоп, нейро полигон, геймерская усадьба, технический момент @crypto_okop · 143,037#2
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 28 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Sokolovsky! @RuslanSokolovsky · 18,979 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 3 October 2026
Prometheus 🔥 Биткоин и криптовалюты @prometheus · 38,884 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 30 August 2026
Криптодурка 💊 @cryptodurkaofficial · 36,471 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 29 August 2026
Ондрей Гойчев (DFW Bals) @ondreigoichev · 137,329 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 12 August 2026
Shitcoin RU | TON memecoin @Shitcoinrun · 29,418 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 6 September 2026
🇷🇺 The Club 100 - Криптовалютый окоп, нейро полигон, геймерская усадьба, технический момент @crypto_okop · 143,037 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 August 2026
$CLOWN | SOL @clown_token · 108,651 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 14 August 2026
Это просто Ёжик в тумане @hedgehoginthefogton · 25,597 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 September 2026
POVEL DUREV / TON memecoin @poveldurev · 264,974 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
BIG BALLS BIRDS @big_balls_birds · 19,148 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 30 September 2026
Болтоши Болтомото @boltoshi · 47,610 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 24 August 2026
CryptoScamm @crypt0scamm · 59,984 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 August 2026
Worty Crypto @wortyton · 33,835 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 31 August 2026
TON POINTER @TONPOINTER · 119,042 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
TradeTON News @TradeTONEN · 87,180 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 21 August 2026
$KAKAXA | TON @kakaxa_coin · 72,860 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
CryptoDays 2.0 🐊 @cryptodays · 29,743 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 6 September 2026
Full Metal Jetton @full_metal_jetton · 41,411 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 28 August 2026
GasPump Announcements @gaspump_tv · 173,944 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 12 August 2026
TON by @korova @tonkorova · 31,929 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 September 2026
Vibes @saintvibes · 46,906 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 24 August 2026
РОМАНОВИЧ @romanovich_ser · 37,651 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 31 August 2026
Nemoneta.COM 🍿 @ne_moneta_com · 38,375 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 29 August 2026
this is TON @this_is_TON · 35,730 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 31 August 2026
This channel appears in 27 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sokolovsky inChain / биткоин и криптовалюты” (@sokolovskyinchain), 19,772 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sokolovskyinchain.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.