Больше 50% доходов нам приносит ИИ — гендиректор Cloud.ru Михаил Лобоцкий в подкасте TAdviser Генеральный директор Cloud.ru Михаил Лобоцкий в подкасте TAdviser рассказал о ключевых вехах мирового и российского рынка «облаков», оценил главные вызовы сегодняшнего дня и поделился мнением о перспективах развития облачной инфраструктуры. Смотреть >>>

Channel
TAdviser
@tadviser
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
13,473subscribers
+70 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001001793461 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tadviser |
| Description | Канал портала TAdviser.ru e-mail [email protected] РКН https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=6734832f8a5fe04efd3e5442®istryType=bloggers |
| Created | 30 September 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 57 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tadviser |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 15:26 | 13,473 | +4 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 13:04 | 13,469 | -1 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 13:05 | 13,470 | +5 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 14:04 | 13,465 | -3 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 12:04 | 13,468 | +3 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 15:05 | 13,465 | -2 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 15:50 | 13,467 | +3 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 19:41 | 13,464 | +6 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 17:39 | 13,458 | -4 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 16:34 | 13,462 | +2 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 18:55 | 13,460 | +6 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 19:19 | 13,454 | +7 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 18:07 | 13,447 | +8 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 16:49 | 13,439 | +8 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 18:00 | 13,431 | -2 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 16:56 | 13,433 | +1 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 15:16 | 13,432 | +14 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 14:16 | 13,418 | +2 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 17:19 | 13,416 | +3 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 17:40 | 13,413 | first reading |
Engagement
140 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 14.9%
- avg views ÷ 13,473 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,010
- 29 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.256%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 29
- of 140 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 25 of 29 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 140 (30 July 2026 – 3 November 2026) |
| Views total | 58,170 |
| Reactions total | 129 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 06:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈5,240
- Videos
- ≈45
- Links
- ≈5,710
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
711 reactions across 98 posts, in 37 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 140 | 19.7% | |
| 🔥 | 138 | 19.4% | |
| 👍 | 133 | 18.7% | |
| 😁 | 130 | 18.3% | |
| 🤣 | 20 | 2.81% | |
| 🤯 | 20 | 2.81% | |
| 🕊 | 13 | 1.83% | |
| 🤡 | 12 | 1.69% | |
| 👏 | 9 | 1.27% | |
| 🥴 | 9 | 1.27% | |
| ✍ | 8 | 1.13% | |
| 🤔 | 7 | 0.985% | |
| 🍌 | 6 | 0.844% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 0.844% | |
| 😱 | 6 | 0.844% | |
| ⚡ | 5 | 0.703% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 0.703% | |
| 👀 | 5 | 0.703% | |
| 🍾 | 4 | 0.563% | |
| 👌 | 4 | 0.563% | |
| 17 further kinds | 31 | 4.36% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 120 of the 140 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 796 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 140 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 5.00%
- 7 of 140 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 7
- posts carrying an erid · 7 distinct tokens
- Median views · ads
- 2,140
- over 7 measured posts
- Median views · rest
- 2,550
- over 130 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2W5zFG9Grq7 | 1 | 24 August 2026 | 24 August 2026 |
| 2W5zFGheTy3 | 1 | 4 August 2026 | 4 August 2026 |
| 2W5zFGm5Eic | 1 | 5 August 2026 | 5 August 2026 |
| 2W5zFHgbGhP | 1 | 17 August 2026 | 17 August 2026 |
| 2W5zFHzNnbb | 1 | 17 August 2026 | 17 August 2026 |
| 2W5zFJ34zHf | 1 | 2 September 2026 | 2 September 2026 |
| 2W5zFK1Ait9 | 1 | 5 August 2026 | 5 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 140 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 3 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 29 posts held from the last 30 days (10.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
⚡️ Российский хостинг-провайдер Beget потерял все данные в облачной инфраструктуре после масштабной кибератаки. 💻 Злоумышленники получили доступ к управляющему контуру архитектуры и запустили обнуляющие скрипты. Бинарные бэкапы VPS полностью утеряны, данные возможно восстановить из файловых бэкапов. 🔍 В облачной инфраструктуре (VPS, S3, Kubernetes) все данные утрачены, включая настройки CDN и IP, при этом файловые …
🤯5🤬1😢1
«Базальт СПО» на конференции РУССОФТ: заказчики выбирают специализированные операционные системы и экосистемность 19 октября 2026 года в пресс-центре ТАСС состоялась пресс-конференция Ассоциации РУССОФТ, посвященная динамике российского рынка программного обеспечения, факторам, влияющим на развитие ИТ-компаний, и перспективам отрасли. От «Базальт СПО» в дискуссии приняли участие начальник отдела сопровождения Андре…
🔥2
СберПро и TAdviser: 80% российских компаний планируют расширять применение генеративного ИИ 80% российских компаний планируют расширять применение генеративного ИИ. При этом 65% сталкивались с пилотами, которые так и не дошли до промышленной эксплуатации. Таковы результаты исследования, проведённого СберПро совместно с аналитическим центром TAdviser с июня по август 2026 года специально к V ежегодной конференции Сб…
❤1
«Русагро» столкнулась со сбоями и медленной работой «1С» в крупнейшем бизнес-юните. Самостоятельная поддержка систем не задалась https://www.tadviser.ru/a/976723 —————————— TAdviser в MAX и ВК
😁7🤣5👍1
ИТ-экосистема «Лукоморье» и ИАА TelecomDaily провели совместное исследование «Проникновение вайб-кодинга, Low-Code/No-Code и роль классической разработки в российских компаниях» По итогам 2026 года объем российского рынка таких инструментов составит 28,23 млрд рублей, что в 7,78 раза превышает аналогичный показатель пятилетней давности. Аналитики ожидают, что к 2030 году рынок вырастет до 46,8 млрд рублей при сохра…
👍3🤔3🤯2
Российский рынок BPM-систем: крупнейшие поставщики и ключевые тренды. Обзор TAdviser https://www.tadviser.ru/index.php/BPM —————————— TAdviser в MAX и ВК
🔥3👍1
От цифровизации к интеллектуальному производству: как ИИ меняет российскую промышленность Искусственный интеллект все активнее применяется даже в такой консервативной отрасли, как промышленность. Компьютерное зрение и машинное обучение помогают контролировать технологические операции, обнаруживать отклонения и потенциально опасные ситуации, следить за состоянием оборудования и сокращать время реакции на события. О…
👍2
«Почта России» готовится к переносу ИТ-систем в три новых ЦОДа. На это выделено 5,48 млрд рублей https://www.tadviser.ru/a/976482 —————————— TAdviser в MAX и ВК
❤2👍2🔥1
Как удары по ЦОДам повлияли на российский рынок серверов и облачных сервисов https://www.tadviser.ru/a/53824 —————————— TAdviser в MAX и ВК
Оптические носители — гарантия защиты данных от атак БПЛА В условиях гибридных угроз вопросы физической и цифровой безопасности выходят на первый план. Атаки беспилотных летательных аппаратов (БПЛА), диверсии и масштабные киберинциденты наглядно демонстрируют уязвимость традиционных IT-инфраструктур. Опыт последних атак показывает, что наиболее уязвимые узлы любого центра обработки данных (ЦОД) — это системы энерго…
❤6🙈2
Российская компания создала СХД, которая позволяет экономить на GPU в AI-кластере Расширение парка GPU не всегда дает ожидаемый прирост производительности ИИ-сервисов, поскольку итоговая скорость зависит не только от вычислительной мощности. На отдельных этапах на отклик влияют подача данных, загрузка модели и ранее кэшированное состояние контекста. Поэтому перед закупкой новых ускорителей важно определить, что ог…
Showing the 12 most recent of 140 posts we hold for @tadviser. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@tadviser edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 2 September 2026
- Most recent edit
- 2 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@ABSolite_solution · 2671 postCommuniGate Systems
@CommuniGate · 5101 postКоординация профанации
@CynExp · 4,9701 postИТ в образовании
@ITobr · 11 postAlfa Digital
@alfadigital_jobs · 53,8381 postСлавуцкий о прибыли в бизнесе
@business_vsv · 1,3801 postSachok AI
@cybersachokAI · 3321 postАссоциация отрасли ЦОД
@dcunionru · 3,5581 postГосЦиФра
@gostsifra · 9491 postНовости ИнтерТраст
@intertrustnews · 1141 postИТ-Экспертиза
@it_expertise_ru · 6951 postMAGNIT TECH career
@magnittech · 4,9161 postСохраненки продакта
@pmsaved · 1541 postЕлизавета Войцеховская и "Все регионы", журнал
@promreg_ru · 1781 postSimpleOne
@simpleoneru · 1,0691 postST club
@stechclub · 1161 postХромосома телекома | Nexign
@telecom_chromosome · 4921 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@antidigital · 24,482
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 September 2026
@mintsifry · 232,667
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 11 August 2026
@telecommunal · 43,885
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 28 August 2026
@blockchainRF · 20,459
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 27 September 2026
@ep_uc · 21,400
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 24 September 2026
@protechietich · 20,744
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 27 September 2026
@yandexcloudnews · 23,982
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 22 September 2026
@ainemkin · 21,316
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 7 September 2026
@russiasmartcity · 19,283
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 October 2026
@maydecree · 19,458
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 October 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TAdviser” (@tadviser), 13,473 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tadviser.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.