Тяжело Росархиву разбираться в вопросах нашей сферы - в приказе от 09.07.2026 № 91 (завтра вступает в силу) о внесении изменений в Правила делопроизводства в госорганах говорится про наделение сотрудников полномочиями по подписанию электронной подписью госоргана, т.е. автоподпись. Но ещё четыре года назад в 63-ФЗ 339-ФЗ были внесены изменения, что распорядительным актом госоргана определяется ни один сотрудник, а ср…

Channel
Об ЭП и УЦ
@ep_uc
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
21,190subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001555507916 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ep_uc |
| Description | «Об ЭП и УЦ» - @ep_uc самый популярный телеграм-канал о сфере электронной подписи 🗣Чат канала https://t.me/joinchat/-y4FR5AKn7hiMzFi 🔄Обратная связь,инфопартнерство - @Ep_Uc_bot Реклама в канале: @Ep_Uc_bot https://telega.in/c/ep_uc |
| Created | 20 September 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ep_uc |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 18:04 | 21,190 | -3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 10:18 | 21,193 | +1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 09:34 | 21,192 | -2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 09:45 | 21,194 | -2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 10:35 | 21,196 | -6 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:38 | 21,202 | -5 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:19 | 21,207 | -7 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:35 | 21,214 | +2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:46 | 21,212 | +5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:32 | 21,207 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:41 | 21,209 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:15 | 21,210 | -6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:43 | 21,216 | +14 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:05 | 21,202 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:36 | 21,202 | first reading |
Engagement
47 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 17.1%
- avg views ÷ 21,190 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,610
- 47 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 47
- of 47 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 47 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 47 (30 July 2026 – 22 August 2026) |
| Views total | 169,850 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Aug 2026, 22:25 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,320
- Videos
- ≈51
- Links
- ≈2,990
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1m 08s
- Average length
- 34s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 13
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 47 we hold a reading for · 2%
- Most on one post
- 13
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ep_uc. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 47 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 22 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 2.13%
- 1 of 47 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 1
- posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
- Median views · ads
- 3,430
- over 1 measured post
- Median views · rest
- 3,300
- over 46 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2SDnjdrDJFD | 1 | 11 August 2026 | 11 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 22 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Переписка с госорганами забавное явление, будто 59-ФЗ и не существует совсем: 1. Государственный орган, орган местного самоуправления или должностное лицо: 1) обеспечивает объективное, всестороннее и своевременное рассмотрение обращения, в случае необходимости - с участием гражданина, направившего обращение Ни одного ответа от Минцифры по существу заданных вопросов. А потом неожиданно выяснится, что сертификат служ…
📣Изменение сроков проведения работ по смене мастер-ключей в СМЭВ на базе СКЗИ ViPNet Новый период работ - с 17 августа по 29 сентября 2026 года. В связи с этим Участникам необходимо проверить все условия, требуемые для обновления МК. Сроки смены ключей разделены на несколько этапов и проводятся в период с 17 августа по 2 сентября и с 22 по 29 сентября 2026 года. Cмена мастер-ключей (МК) в защищенных сетях ViPNet С…
❓Почему сайт Минцифры до сих пор не перешёл на сертификат безопасности от Минцифры? Ответ следующий: С учетом изменений, принятых Федеральным законом от 26 июня 2026 года № 210-ФЗ «О внесении изменений в Федеральный закон О связи и отдельные законодательные акты Российской Федерации», Правительство Российской Федерации вправе установить случаи, при которых использование сертификатов Национального удостоверяющего цен…
✍️Госуслуги продолжат использование ГОСТ 28147‑89 В продолжение темы использования ГОСТ 28147-89 получен ответ Минцифры о сроках окончания использования данного ГОСТ в рамках портала Госуслуг: Модернизация криптографической инфраструктуры Портала госуслуг проводится в плановом порядке с учетом требований законодательства в области информационной безопасности, технических возможностей интеграционных решений и необход…
✍️Поднятая волна со сдачей отчётностью в СФР не могла не сказаться на динамике перевыпуска сертификатов УЦ ФНС России, которую можно изучить по отзывам сертификатов. В августе 2026 истекают сертификаты, выданные в мае 2025 - и в мае прошлого года сертификатов было выдано меньше, чем в апреле. Если же посмотреть на динамику отзыва, то в рабочие дни июля отзыв стабильно держался на уровне 15-18 тыс., а в августе взлет…
🔐 PKI-Карнавал на Каменном острове Я в маске рыжей обезьяны На форум к вам попасть мечтал Но мой доклад про Головной УЦ Комом вам в горле встал Санкт-Петербург заслуженно сравнивают с Венецией — схожесть двум городам придают загадочная атмосфера, многочисленные каналы, переплетения истории и выдающаяся архитектура. PKI-Форум 2026 сделает эту связь предельно наглядной, устроив для участников мероприятия пышный PKI-…
О проблемах с CRL НУЦ 13 августа точки распространения CRL НУЦ стали работать нестабильно. Проверка отзыва части сертификатов завершалась с ошибкой. Недоступны стали адреса: http://nuc-cdp.voskhod.ru/cdp/subca_ssl_rsa2024_ov.crl - сейчас восстановлен✅ (была спрятана за каптчу). http://nuc-cdp.digital.gov.ru/cdp/subca_ssl_rsa2024_ov.crl - по настоящее время недоступен ❌ Что же случилось с НУЦ? 13 августа количество …
😂15 июля прошёл вебинар Госключа по внедрению технологии мобильной подписи в транспортной отрасли, файл ответов на заданные вопросы приложен к посту. Подписчик нашего канала Дмитрий поучаствовал в вебинаре и задал ряд вопросов. Он подготовил развернутый обзор ответов на свои вопросы и считает необходимым его опубликовать. Сделанный вывод по итогам разбора ответов Минцифры вполне логичен.
✍️Модельный закон "Об электронной подписи" - нужен или нет? Постоянная комиссия Межпарламентской Ассамблеи СНГ по экономике в ближайшие три года планирует разработать новые модельные законы для стран Содружества, среди них новая редакция модельного закона «Об электронной подписи», об этом сообщает пресс-служба Исполкома Содружества. Текущая редакция была принята 26 лет назад. Одну редакцию вроде как парламентарии …
✍️Исторический пост - 5 лет письму Минцифры в ответ на запросы ФНС России Минцифры 5 лет назад в ответ на запросы ФНС России направило письмо, в котором разъяснило порядок применения КЭП после 2022 года в связи с изменениями в 63-ФЗ: 🔹 Сертификаты УЦ, аккредитованных после 01.07.2020 - действуют до окончания срока, в том числе после 01.01.2022. 🔹 Сертификаты УЦ, НЕ прошедших аккредитацию до 01.07.2021 - применять по…
ИУЛ: Минстрой отозвал письмо. И что теперь? Минстрой письмом № 49157-АЕ/14 от 07.08.2026 отозвал своё же письмо № 4420-КМ/14 от 30.01.2026 — то самое, на котором во многом строилась январско-февральская кампания по переходу от ИУЛ к УКЭП. 🎵Вот уж точно, недолго музыка играла🙈 ❓ Зачем один замминистра отозвал письмо другого? Наша версия: вопрос упёрся в полномочия по регулированию электронной подписи, которые нах…
Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @ep_uc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 23,814 of 1,584,142entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@uc_fk · 5,5258 postsГОСТ VPN | aveselov.ru
@aveselov_ru · 1,9962 postsИб в вузе
@ib_vuz · 12 postsЛисток бюрократической защиты информации
@bureaucraticsecurity · 18,9671 postЭДО для бизнеса
@EDOB2B · 7,4861 postКадровый Болт Генона
@kadr_b0lt_Genona · 2,0161 postЭлектронные документы в Росатоме
@RosatomED · 521 postТехноНационал
@TehnoNacional · 2,6361 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@uc_fk · 5,52512 postsTech Talk
@ru_tech_talk · 30,7178 postsЛисток бюрократической защиты информации
@bureaucraticsecurity · 18,9677 postsЭДО для бизнеса
@EDOB2B · 7,4865 postsГОСТ VPN | aveselov.ru
@aveselov_ru · 1,9962 postsИб в вузе
@ib_vuz · 12 postsДайджест
@blogbankir · 77,1431 postГалина Царёва (официальный)
@Galina_Tsareva_official · 67,3671 postКадровый Болт Генона
@kadr_b0lt_Genona · 2,0161 postМарина Масленникова
@mamaslennikova · 29,7021 postMarketOverview
@MarketOverview · 46,2291 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@nalog_gov_ru · 90,010
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Об ЭП и УЦ” (@ep_uc), 21,190 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ep_uc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.