26 measurements spanning 31 days, net -193. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,722–22,982 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Sept 2026, 07:38
22,752
-53
4 Sept 2026, 16:36
22,805
-25
3 Sept 2026, 01:06
22,830
+1
2 Sept 2026, 00:58
22,829
+15
1 Sept 2026, 01:44
22,814
+1
31 Aug 2026, 02:35
22,813
-4
30 Aug 2026, 05:49
22,817
-14
28 Aug 2026, 07:43
22,831
-4
27 Aug 2026, 06:07
22,835
+3
26 Aug 2026, 04:15
22,832
-6
25 Aug 2026, 04:17
22,838
-11
24 Aug 2026, 01:28
22,849
-4
22 Aug 2026, 12:26
22,853
-18
21 Aug 2026, 04:54
22,871
-3
20 Aug 2026, 03:45
22,874
-2
19 Aug 2026, 00:45
22,876
+1
18 Aug 2026, 01:42
22,875
-12
16 Aug 2026, 22:17
22,887
-21
15 Aug 2026, 16:58
22,908
-7
14 Aug 2026, 06:54
22,915
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 24 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
2,978 reactions across 16 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
846
28.4%
👍
736
24.7%
🔥
393
13.2%
🤡
234
7.86%
😭
166
5.57%
😐
120
4.03%
🏆
100
3.36%
🤯
77
2.59%
🤣
70
2.35%
👀
55
1.85%
👎
30
1.01%
🤔
26
0.873%
🤝
26
0.873%
💔
24
0.806%
👌
19
0.638%
✍
15
0.504%
👏
11
0.369%
😡
11
0.369%
🤗
11
0.369%
💯
3
0.101%
2 further kinds
5
0.168%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,978 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 24 January 2025 to 10 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
We are celebrating 25 years of Transfermarkt! 🥳
What began in 2000 as a small hobby project by our founder Matthias Seidel is now the world’s largest freely accessible football database. A quarter of a century of football passion, community power, and millions of data points.
None of this would be possible without you.
A huge thank you to our community, all employees, data scouts, and users – you are the heart of …
🚨We just launched our new quiz game WHO AM I? on our website! Also make sure to drop us some feedback 🤓
Test your football know-how: https://transfermarkt.com/s/8575 👈
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @transfermarkt_off. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Transfer News Football @transfer_news_football · 89,377 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 August 2026
Transfer News Live @TransferNews_Live · 48,946 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
Official Fabrizio Romano @FabrizioRomanoTG · 393,101 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
B/R Football @br_football_news · 79,836 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Transfermarkt” (@transfermarkt_off), 22,752 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/transfermarkt_off.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
