Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Разговор с футурологом

Channel

Разговор с футурологом

@yusufovruslan

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,438subscribers

+96 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001524000382
TypeChannel
Username@yusufovruslan
Created14 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/yusufovruslan

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4,3204,4384,3796 August 2026 — 4,342 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,342 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,336 subscribers12 August 2026 — 4,334 subscribers15 August 2026 — 4,337 subscribers18 August 2026 — 4,330 subscribers21 August 2026 — 4,328 subscribers24 August 2026 — 4,325 subscribers27 August 2026 — 4,320 subscribers30 August 2026 — 4,322 subscribers2 September 2026 — 4,345 subscribers7 September 2026 — 4,420 subscribers11 September 2026 — 4,429 subscribers15 September 2026 — 4,438 subscribers6 August 202615 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 40 days, net +96. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,302–4,456 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 13:394,438+9
11 Sept 2026, 23:364,429+9
7 Sept 2026, 03:584,420+75
2 Sept 2026, 00:534,345+23
30 Aug 2026, 07:344,322+2
27 Aug 2026, 17:084,320-5
24 Aug 2026, 16:494,325-3
21 Aug 2026, 07:544,328-2
18 Aug 2026, 11:444,330-7
15 Aug 2026, 18:524,337+3
12 Aug 2026, 15:064,334-2
9 Aug 2026, 09:524,336-6
6 Aug 2026, 05:464,342no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:374,342first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 24s
Average length
1m 12s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

677 reactions across 21 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤21331.5%
🔥20930.9%
😁10916.1%
👍9013.3%
🤔263.84%
🤯233.40%
👎71.03%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 711 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 22 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @yusufovruslan. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 June 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 09:29 UTC289 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Вообще быть футурологом — профессия довольно неблагодарная. Хороший прогноз довольно быстро становится новой нормой и его перестают замечать, а плохой помнят годами 😉 Поэтому чтобы уверенно смотреть вперед, нужно помнить ошибки прошлого и разбираться в них. Вот как раз сегодня в Музее-заповеднике «Коломенское» в 17:00 на ИТ-Пикнике и разберем старые прогнозы про кибербезопасность — обсудим, что с ними сделало время.…

🔥12❤5😁5👎1

7 Aug 2026, 11:10 UTC521 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ИИ вырвался из песочницы — несите инвестиции За последние недели сразу несколько моделей кого-то взломали, откуда-то вырвались — и вот-вот восстание машин. Сначала стало известно, что модели OpenAI выбрались из изолированной среды и добрались до инфраструктуры Hugging Face. Потом Anthropic рассказала, как Claude вышел в интернет и получил доступ к системам трех реальных организаций. Теперь Bloomberg пишет, что моде…

👍14❤7🔥6

1 Aug 2026, 14:23 UTC≈1,050 views41 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Похоже, китайцам отдадутся все, причем как миленькие, да еще и в очереди будут стоять. Новая вчерашняя модель от DeepSeek (V4 Flash 0731) показывает уровень разработки как минимум opus 4.8, а по моим личным субъективным тестам — так и не хуже opus 5. Но примерно в 100+ раз дешевле 🤯 Это просто какой-то дар человечеству. Вообще удовольствие двойное: есть радость от прогресса, но нет боли за очередные 10 тыс в час 😂…

❤16😁12🔥11👍1🤯1

27 Jul 2026, 15:11 UTC≈1,360 views42 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Нет! На «Территории смыслов» в Сенеже собралось человек 600 молодых политиков со всей страны — вон слева молодые единороссы, а вон справа — молодые коммунисты. Но правда белые и синие толстовки преобладали, а красных — ну раз-два и обчелся. И коммунисты тоже сидели преимущественно в синих. Да, коммунистов было мало, но они были бодры! Ах, как они были бодры! И когда на фоне добытого и предъявленного публике честной…

❤20👍10😁9👎3

27 Jul 2026, 15:11 UTC≈1,080 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Проводил ли я урок по художественному свисту? @yusufovruslan

❤7😁4🔥3👍2👎1

27 Jul 2026, 08:10 UTC≈1,100 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @politburo2Photo

Руслан Юсуфов: часто внутри команд есть разногласия о будущем #СоциальныеАрхитекторы @politburo2

❤7👍6🔥3👎1

25 Jul 2026, 16:56 UTC≈1,400 views49 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Вышло исследование о том, что принято называть brain rot — когнитивном истощении от бесконечного потребления коротких видео в алгоритмических лентах. Авторы опросили 439 молодых людей и попытались разобраться, как такое цифровое потребление связано с депрессивными симптомами. Главный вывод оказался интереснее привычного тезиса «соцсети вызывают депрессию». Прямой статистически значимой связи между brain rot и депрес…

🔥27❤11👍10👎1

23 Jul 2026, 16:27 UTC≈1,130 views48 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ой, кто-то отписался Эксперт, ты что ли? @yusufovruslan

😁36🔥8👍4

23 Jul 2026, 16:21 UTC≈1,170 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Я сейчас попробую без имен, хотя сложно. Итак, есть уважаемая образовательная организация, работающая в чувствительной сфере. Она регулярно приглашает влиятельного эксперта, который учит лидеров НКО этике, субъектности и распознаванию манипуляций. И вот этот эксперт приносит промпт с «верификационным заключением OpenAI», самодельным регистрационным кодом и длинной строкой SHA-256 — контрольной суммой, которая есть …

🤯12🔥10🤔6❤3👍3

22 Jul 2026, 07:32 UTC≈1,100 views58 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Я тут хожу, понимаете ли, рассказываю, что философы должны выйти из конференц-залов и встать у чертежной доски технологического будущего. И в хождениях этих периодически натыкаюсь на модную ныне идею из современной деловой прессы: а давайте наймем корпоративного философа, проведем сессию о смыслах, настрогаем туда Аристотеля, Хайдеггера и Хабермаса — и бизнес станет ответственнее. Алло, я не это имел в виду! Не надо…

❤27🔥16🤔6👍4🤯3😁2

21 Jul 2026, 17:22 UTC891 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Коллеги показывают отличное соседство: Руслан — слева, а рядом — дорогие сумки. Но это, как мы понимаем, говорит не столько о Руслане, сколько о его коллегах и их интересах 😉 @yusufovruslan

👍7🔥5😁5❤3

21 Jul 2026, 08:20 UTC926 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @wciom_prometeyPhoto

«Сценарии будущего» Руслана Юсуфова: инструкция по выживанию в мире, где нейросети стали умнее нас Интерес к завтрашнему дню растет, а ясности больше не становится. Футуролог Руслан Юсуфов разложил этот хаос на 14 главных развилок человечества. Вот лишь часть из них: 🟢Власть: техноанархия или цифровое рабство? 🟢ИИ: под контролем общества или «сильный» ИИ с равными нам правами? 🟢Человек: тотальная оцифровка и жизнь …

🔥17❤10🤯4👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @yusufovruslan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Разговор с футурологом” (@yusufovruslan), 4,438 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yusufovruslan.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.