Channel
@EFTtrapy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,639subscribers
-1,801 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001211760804 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @EFTtrapy |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/EFTtrapy |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:56 | 7,639 | -383 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 8,022 | -476 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 09:11 | 8,498 | -131 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:05 | 8,629 | -145 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 03:24 | 8,774 | -133 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:37 | 8,907 | -195 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:18 | 9,102 | -85 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:14 | 9,187 | -253 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:50 | 9,440 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:03 | 9,440 | first reading |
26 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 26 (26 June 2026 – 23 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,180 |
| Reactions total | 29 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 19:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
153 reactions across 21 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 79 | 51.6% | |
| 👍 | 72 | 47.1% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 1.31% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 159 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🍀💐🌼 از بهترین و دلنشینترین کانالهای تلگرام لذت ببریم 🧿 ذکرهای شگفت انگیز 📿 @jazbaramashh 📕 دل تراپی @Del_Therapy 🌻 کتاب گویای من @ketabegooya_man 🍎 آرا حقوقی قضایی و نظریات مشورتی @ARA_HOGHOOGHI_GHAZAIE 🍀 کتابخانه طبی، درمان با داروهای خانگی @danyalshafa 🌻 جادوی گیاهان دارویی طب سینوی @teb_sinawi 🍎 زبان ترکی رو قورت بده @ArazTurkish 🍀 کتابخانه کودک و نوجوان @childrenbook 🌻 آموزشگاه طبی سید @samsadeghitebeslami 🍎…
چرا در لحظهی بیتوجهی، عقلت موقتاً خاموش میشود؟ 🧠🛑 «تا حالا شده بعد از یک دلخوریِ کوچک در رابطه، رفتاری کنی (مثل فرستادن رگبار پیامهای عصبی، یا قهر کردنهای طولانی) که بعد از چند ساعت با خودت بگویی: “واقعاً چرا این کار را کردم؟ من که اینقدر بچهگانه رفتار نمیکردم!” تقصیر تو نیست؛ تقصیر سیستم عصبیات است! وقتی حس میکنی مهم نیستی، بخشی از مغز به نام آمیگدال (مرکز آلارم گوشیِ بدن) فعال میشود. آمیگدال بخشِ منطقیِ …
❤5👍2
وقتی حس میکنی مهم نیستی، بدنت دقیقاً چه کار میکند؟ 💔 «وقتی طرف مقابلت دیر جواب میدهد، یا با لحنِ سردی صحبت میکند، تو فقط در ذهنت غمگین نمیشوی؛ کلِ بدنت وارد یک وضعیت اورژانسی میشود. آیا تا به حال به واکنشهای بدنت در این لحظات دقت کردهای؟ یک سنگینیِ ناگهانی روی قفسه سینهات حس میکنی (انگار اکسیژن کم آمده). عضلات شانه و گردنت منقبض و سفت میشوند. توی دلت آشوب میشود یا زیر دلت خالی میشود. حتی ممکن است دست و…
❤8
فرمولِ طلایی؛ چطور دعوا را در نطفه خفه کنیم؟ رسیدیم به بخشِ «چهکار کنم؟». برای اینکه دعواها را تمام کنی، باید از «زبانِ سرزنش» به «زبانِ نیاز» مهاجرت کنی. فرمولش ساده است: «من حس میکنم … وقتی … چون نیاز دارم به …» به جای اینکه بگویی: «تو اصلاً منو نمیبینی و بیتوجهی!» (حمله) بگو: ✅ «من وقتی میبینم گوشی دستته و با من حرف نمیزنی، احساس میکنم تنهام (حس من). چون الان دلم میخواست با هم وقت بگذرونیم و احساسِ نزد…
❤4👍1
چرا هرچه بیشتر حرف میزنی، کمتر شنیده میشوی؟ تا حالا شده در اوجِ دعوا، تمامِ منطق و استدلالهای عالم را به کار بگیری تا ثابت کنی حق با توست، اما طرف مقابلت فقط بیشتر عصبی شده؟ 🛑 دعواها «ناتمام» میمانند چون ما در دامِ «تو» میافتیم. وقتی میگویی: ❌ «تو همیشه بیمسئولیتی» ❌ «تو هیچوقت به من اهمیت نمیدی» ❌ «تو اصلاً نمیفهمی من چی میگم» …سیستم عصبی طرف مقابل فوراً وارد حالتِ «جنگ یا گریز» میشود. گوشهایش بست…
❤5
*چرا ما همیشه سر مسائلِ احمقانه دعوا میکنیم*؟ دعواهایی که هیچوقت تمام نمیشوند، یک ویژگیِ مشترک دارند: *موضوعِ دعوا، اصلاً موضوعِ اصلی نیست! ⚠️* شما سر «چرا ظرفها را نشستی؟» دعوا میکنید، اما در واقع دارید سرِ «چرا من برای تو اولویت نیستم؟» میجنگید. شما سر «چرا دیر جواب دادی؟» فریاد میزنید، اما در واقع دارید میگویید «از اینکه نادیده گرفته بشم، میترسم». نکته طلایی: وقتی دعواها تکراری میشوند، یعنی شما دارید…
❤2👍2
Posted without readable text
«اگه براش مهم بودم، اینطور رفتار نمیکرد…» 🥀 این جملهای است که احتمالاً بارها در تنهایی به خودت گفتی. احساسِ مهم نبودن، یکی از سوزناکترین دردهای رابطهای است. اما آیا میدانی که این حس، بیشتر از آنکه مربوط به “طرف مقابل” باشد، مربوط به “درونِ تو” است؟ در این ویس، با هم به اعماق این احساس سفر میکنیم تا بفهمیم چه اتفاقی در روان ما میافتد. 🎧 گوش کن تا بفهمی چرا اینقدر از بیتوجهیها آسیب میبینی. ⚡توجه داشته …
❤10👍2
تا حالا حس کردید مهم نیستید ؟
👍15👎2
سلام چطورید
✨ به چه چیزهایی در یک رابطه، نباید عادت کنیم؟ ✨ 🔹 دعوای تکراری: اینکه هر وقت از ناراحتیهامون صحبت میکنیم، تبدیل به یک دعوای بزرگ بشه و بعدش از بیان حسمون پشیمون بشیم! 🔹 فرار از گفتگو: اینکه در شرایط سخت به جای حرف زدن، قهر کنیم، ناپدید بشیم یا سکوت کنیم تا شرایط خودش عادی بشه! 🔹 ندیدنِ محبتها: اینکه تلاشها و محبتهای کوچک همدیگه رو نبینیم و فکر کنیم «وظیفهشه» و از هم قدردانی نکنیم. 🔹 روزمرگیِ مطلق: اینکه همه…
👍3❤2
5 دلیل که بعضی آدمها در رابطه همیشه نگرانند ترس از طرد شدن هر فاصلهای را شبیه رد شدن حس میکنند. تجربههای قدیمی خیانت، بیثباتی یا ترک شدن، ذهن را حساس میکند. سیستم عصبیِ هشدار بدن زودتر از فکر وارد اضطراب میشود. گره خوردن آرامش به رابطه اگر امنیت درونی فقط به طرف مقابل وصل شود، هر تغییر کوچکی بزرگ حس میشود. نداشتن مهارت تنظیم احساس فرد سریع واکنش نشان میدهد، چون هنوز بلد نیست بین احساس و واکنش فاصله بگذا…
👍5❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @EFTtrapy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 547,565 of 1,630,085 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 43 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@EFTtrapy named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“درمان رابطه با EFT” (@EFTtrapy), 7,639 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EFTtrapy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.