هالمرهَ اني باقي بمكاني والأشياء الي تريدني خل هيّ تجيني.🎀 -

Channel
𝙴𝚅𝙰
@EVA_030
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
67,616subscribers
-264 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001242114394 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @EVA_030 |
| Description | أيام بتمحي أيام . للتواصل والتمويل : @Eva_1Ibot قناة التمويل @EVA_0333 |
| Created | 20 July 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 36 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/EVA_030 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Oct 2026, 11:58 | 67,616 | -39 |
| 1 Oct 2026, 13:58 | 67,655 | -166 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 10:19 | 67,821 | -38 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 05:17 | 67,859 | +35 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 15:00 | 67,824 | -5 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 23:38 | 67,829 | +5 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 23:36 | 67,824 | -64 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 22:00 | 67,888 | +13 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 23:57 | 67,875 | +97 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:15 | 67,778 | -19 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:34 | 67,797 | -19 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:05 | 67,816 | -14 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 17:58 | 67,830 | +5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 21:24 | 67,825 | +16 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:18 | 67,809 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:12 | 67,810 | -6 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 02:55 | 67,816 | +2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:36 | 67,814 | -13 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:52 | 67,827 | +15 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 01:12 | 67,812 | first reading |
Engagement
346 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 137 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 8.41%
- avg views ÷ 67,616 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 5,680
- 169 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 169
- of 346 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 169 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 346 (1 August 2026 – 6 October 2026) |
| Views total | 960,539 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Oct 2026, 22:57 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈7,790
- Videos
- ≈56
- Links
- ≈22
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 28
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 8
- of 346 we hold a reading for · 2%
- Most on one post
- 10
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @EVA_030. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 346 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 6 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
-
اول قناة اشتركت بيها بالتلي ومثبته بأول القائمة مستحيل يمر يوم وما اتصفحها تجنن 🎁: 💔 @BELLA_0 🎁 💔 @BELLA_0 🎁
وان ضل قلبي فقلبي انت تعرفه
Photo, posted without a caption
"وجهكَ مُستراح مَتاعبي ."
"لا أعرف فراشة بحجم امرأة إلا عندما تضحكين."
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
على الرحابة أن تكون في صدرك أولًا، ثم في المكان.
المتر المربع الأغلى في العالم هو رأسك. لا تدع أحداً يعيش فيه مجاناً.
دائماً وابداً: أقترابك من الله يعني أقتراب كل شي تتمناه.
Showing the 12 most recent of 346 posts we hold for @EVA_030. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@tumblr101 · 83,4537 postsحَيــاة🤍~
@hayaatsh · 6085 posts𝚉𝙾𝙴 🦋.
@llCCTL · 1065 posts𝘩𝘢𝘻𝘦𝘭🕯️
@stngh8 · 554 postsUnique - فريدة
@UNIQUE96_1 · 51,1173 postslife🦦
@f_313_tl · 1,3373 posts🎀 ¦ fatoosh
@itsfatoosh · 3813 posts| سَديم |
@saturnH5 · 3733 postsسيناريو زمان ∞
@scenario1la · 6613 posts شي مرَّة فكَّرت ؟💙🌙
@dayszahraa1 · 71,7182 postsشَيءٌ ما مُختلِف
@mokhtalifah · 71,0622 postsطيف 𐦍
@DEPTH02 · 32,6371 postSomnera
@Gentilezza23 · 3931 post حورهِن | ٢٠٠١
@Hawraa23_M0 · 2,9611 postحَديثُ الذّاتِ
@UI99F · 1911 postالـشَـام🦋
@al_shaam · 2031 postالآيـَّة
@aya2muhammed · 1331 postBir rüya
@coffee5558 · 1501 postحُسـಿـنُہآ ♡
@hosunwajamal · 1121 postڪِـزلار.
@kzlarll · 9321 post• الحمدلله 🌸
@llahh113 · 12,5671 post🦢~
@moana200 · 1,7711 postعُمقق
@o0mak · 2871 postصدقة جارية
@ongoiingchariity · 2,2801 postSparkle 💫
@passion00 · 3671 post✨peace
@peacezainab · 3631 post𝑆𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑡💕
@s_sweet6 · 2,0801 post٢٠٠٣ م
@sarawe11 · 971 postنَــون
@sslll4 · 4341 postود✨
@wid18 · 3,9361 postصفرونه💛💛
@x_safajoud_x · 311 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@rowanr7 · 6,18026 postsبيلا || Bella
@Bella_0 · 60,49312 postsآن 🫧
@tumblr101 · 83,45312 postsسكُـون
@SUKOON147 · 9,5579 postsUnique - فريدة
@UNIQUE96_1 · 51,1179 postsطيف 𐦍
@DEPTH02 · 32,6377 postsمَــكـتبة زهَــرة ||🤎
@nms19a · 2,5476 postsشَيءٌ ما مُختلِف
@mokhtalifah · 71,0625 postsيوسف
@ll0nn · 12,9003 posts- مَجرّات .
@Majaraat · 59,2602 posts𝓜𝓲racle 𝐠𝓲rl
@ghufran_52 · 9732 postsALIENS
@aliens98 · 11,6571 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@EVA_030 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026 · confirmed gone 13 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@UNIQUE96_1 · 51,117#1
@mokhtalifah · 71,062#2
@Bella_0 · 60,493#3
@hajernazem90 · 19,448#4
@tumblr101 · 83,453#5
@OieeiO · 30,405#6
@lAlMosahfl · 776,148#7
@smr120h · 104,116#8
@hayaa_0 · 72,490#9
@nr0lll · 80,683#10
@drdonyy · 5,594#11
@lqii_i · 22,874#12
@M1140 · 99,061#13
@DEPTH02 · 32,637#14
@iii2may · 2,191#15
@Majaraat · 59,260#16
@llSPR · 19,733#17
@fajer87 · 30,609#18
@cciiccj · 1#19
@luv634 · 15,977#20
@beauty_d3 · 26,450#21
@Dec369 · 3,519#22
@JJ3DA · 20,790#23
@OZH_33 · 8,617#24
@MEXXME · 17,675#25
@bggcp · 34,589#26
@OLEIVIA · 22,243#27
@matestasabnesh · 16,706#28
@Geoooom · 71,225#29
@i610e · 12,463#30
@pinkyallllo · 10,063#31
@MYM002 · 4,499#32
@VlIVlI · 1,356#33
@lastgoodbye1 · 20,940#34
@breathe2l · 422#35
@gramarduc · 12,264#36
@forqanwassam313 · 31,278#37
@yanhano · 9,576#38
@zoniijj · 2,056#39
@amli114 · 20,476#40
@dayszahraa1 · 71,718#41
@eo_wb · 9,869#42
@swangirl6 · 10,088#43
@azawii96 · 8,379#44
@ethpharmacy · 8,574#45
@zeynsgards · 5,704#46
@fajrmd · 12,143#47
@lSwingl · 4,066#48
@mx1ln · 7,468#49
@n_a2u · 12,873#50
@llllVAB · 734#51
@elfno · 16,966#52
@ban_peace · 7,039#53
@cf67z · 87,554#54
@fatimatali1 · 3,206#55
@caco1americana · 6,075#56
@lRlTI · 75,399#57
@Gentilezza23 · 393#58
@z2n00 · 3,792#59
@ham_zaq · 1,370#60
@doaadawod · 8,269#61
@DIUI2 · 3,382#62
@dr7wa · 425#63
@deved_iraq · 118,844#64
@ooooollllleeeeeeee · 7,283#65
@tuq7adnan · 7,272#66
@Imhadeer · 12,343#67
@ay0tah · 2,060#68
@aliens98 · 11,657#69
@estraha_0 · 17,164#70
@jar969 · 7,805#71
@llquraanll · 248,439#72
@CllOC · 18,108#73
@Sabara_21 · 24,259#74
@batnashit0 · 68,754#75
@santer_sads · 361,194#76
@Medical_cours1 · 738,025#77
@denizoo22 · 2,065#78
@thegreat_haider · 8,645#79
@Alimajed28 · 4,391#80
@Newton1998 · 376,804#81
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@HEVENiQ · 20,647
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 26 September 2026
@UNIQUE96_1 · 51,117
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 25 August 2026
@Bella_0 · 60,493
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
@mokhtalifah · 71,062
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 August 2026
@tumblr101 · 83,453
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 August 2026
@MIo3o · 26,293
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 September 2026
@pic_or · 20,519
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 26 September 2026
@book12_1 · 26,654
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 September 2026
@ABDSH96 · 29,466
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 8 September 2026
@iWritings · 45,697
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 27 August 2026
@ask_33s · 24,091
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 16 September 2026
@Sabara_21 · 24,259
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 16 September 2026
@bjnoo · 69,906
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 20 August 2026
@beauty_d3 · 26,450
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 12 September 2026
@fajer87 · 30,609
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 6 September 2026
@lqii_i · 22,874
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 19 September 2026
@MAi3i · 58,485
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 22 August 2026
@SACHERTI · 160,513
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026
@emaan_faris · 27,443
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 10 September 2026
@JBY21 · 46,945
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
@dayszahraa1 · 71,718
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 20 August 2026
@BM_Channel · 121,031
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
@NEBAL · 27,472
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 10 September 2026
@H11_I · 26,895
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 September 2026
This channel appears in 60 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝙴𝚅𝙰” (@EVA_030), 67,616 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EVA_030.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.