27 measurements spanning 29 days, net -218. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,819–20,103 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Sept 2026, 19:37
19,852
-3
3 Sept 2026, 01:44
19,855
-9
1 Sept 2026, 22:57
19,864
-3
1 Sept 2026, 00:06
19,867
-10
30 Aug 2026, 21:07
19,877
-11
29 Aug 2026, 19:52
19,888
-7
28 Aug 2026, 19:14
19,895
-16
27 Aug 2026, 15:44
19,911
-4
26 Aug 2026, 12:25
19,915
-8
25 Aug 2026, 13:42
19,923
-17
24 Aug 2026, 10:24
19,940
-17
22 Aug 2026, 18:37
19,957
-16
21 Aug 2026, 09:07
19,973
-5
20 Aug 2026, 12:28
19,978
-8
19 Aug 2026, 14:04
19,986
-11
18 Aug 2026, 10:47
19,997
-2
17 Aug 2026, 12:47
19,999
-9
16 Aug 2026, 01:56
20,008
-6
14 Aug 2026, 14:17
20,014
-6
13 Aug 2026, 03:34
20,020
first reading
Engagement
56 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
17.6%
avg views ÷ 19,852 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,490
50 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
50
of 56 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held
56 (4 August 2026 – 31 August 2026)
Views total
174,500
Reactions total
6,988
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 01:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4m 59s
Average length
37s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
8,065 reactions across 55 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
5,806
72.0%
👍
1,276
15.8%
😁
824
10.2%
🎉
86
1.07%
😢
36
0.446%
🤯
21
0.26%
🤬
16
0.198%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 56 of the 56 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,065 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
1.79%
1 of 56 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
3,160
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
3,430
over 55 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VSb5w8sFvA
1
25 August 2026
25 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 31 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Сейчас многие женщины моего возраста выходят замуж за парней лет на 10 помладше. Прям тенденция😁
Вы узнаете, почему, дочитав до конца)
Мой тоже меня младше, но на 5 лет всего.
Окружающих волнует один вопрос ко всем, кто старше мужа:
А не боишься, что он потом тебя бросит и уйдет к молодой
Так и мужик-ровесник или старше тоже уйдет к молодой😁 Выше вероятность, потому что там ещё и кризис среднего возраста!
Довольно…
Процесс идет👌🏼
Прям очевидный сдвиг. Но джинсы и шорты добеременные все впритык, давят))
Работаем дальше, с октября подключить спорт зал планирую. Там вообще быстро в форму приду. Я тогда ревела в примерочной, что никогда не похудею обратно))😁
Жалею, что не начала вести блог в VK года 3 назад. Сейчас очень хочу, но с нуля начинать страшно, это сожрет весь ресурс и деньги. Не переставала об этом думать последние месяцы, мучалась, сомневалась.
Вспомнила, что у меня есть личный астролог, вот и задала ему вопрос:
стоит ли мне сейчас вкладывать силы и деньги в развитие блога в новой соцсети (VK)? И когда он начнет приносить прибыль?
Получила четкие развенутые…
Огромная вам мамская вам благодарность за рекомендации вот этих двух гаджетов, купила, пользуюсь пару дней - в восторге😍
✔️Портативный блендер
Оч понравился, места не занимает, маленький и под рукой всегда, пюрешки овощные в нем делаю на 2 кормления как раз. Смузи себе один раз пока делала, классно. Удобно, мыть 5 секунд. Заряжается type C за час до 100%. На 2-3 дня точно хватает👌🏼 С собой брать в путешествия или от…
Алла, а есть ли у вас советы и инструкции как вести себя в пременопаузу? Оказалось, что эту тему мало кто вообще поднимает, но все женщины в этот период входят.
Итак, предменопауза и менопауза. Это важно знать и понимать.
У женщин после 35 лет уровень эстрогенов постепенно начинает снижаться, а в период предменопаузы и менопаузы они вообще резко падают и колеблются туда-сюда, что вызывает вот это всякое гадкое сост…
Geltek прыгнули выше своей головы и выпустили уходовый антивозрастной стик с пептидами - и это фурор!
Мне очень понравился, из ухода только его брала в Карелию - шикарно👌🏼
Умылась, провела стиком по сухой коже лица и шеи в зоне заломов на лбу, глаз, носогубок, немного пальцами распределила и всё!
У него тающая текстура, без липкости, приятно наносить, будто оставляет небольшой холодок на коже: изумительно освежает и…
Напомните мне про белок написать вам годную статью!)
А то одно и то же везде пишут из учебников -
1,8 - 2 г белка в сутки на 1 кг веса.
О боже, как все ясно-понятно, спасибо досвидания😂
Скажу, как действовать по-людски и не загоняться с рассчетами.
Пришел результат анализа.
Мой индекс омега-3 - 12🔥
Это база, это не только про кожу и волосы, это про поддержание эстрагенов и про репродуктивное здоровье в том числе.
Кстати, с моими неудавшимися беременностями омега-3 индекс был около 6-7.
До зачатия Богдана я подняла его до 12, так и держится👌🏼
Я постоянно на омеге сижу, и топлю за то, чтобы каждая женщина делала так же.
А именно:
✔️Еда в рационе по максималке…
Купила Полине чумовой подарок к 1 сентября - аромабокс Randewoo «Круче всех», где собрано 8 ароматов для девочек, знающих себе цену🔥
Моя идет в 3-й класс и будет в восторге от этого бокса, а девчонки постарше, так вообще, пищать будут👌🏼
Оформление нереально красивое, коробочка на магните. Естественно, я всё перенюхала, - очень удачные девчачьи ароматы, кое-что себе забрать охото))
Точно такой же бокс выпустили и дл…
«Фанатка» моя из ИГ выдала только что на проблемы послеродовые со сном😁
Я в ответах не стесняюсь))
Но доля правды в этом есть: я спивалась в прошлых отношениях.
И спилась бы, не приняв волевое решение, - бежать без оглядки.
Не «забухиваю» я уже, как минимум, полтора года👌🏼
И даже не из-за беременности (это итак понятно), а потому-что причина была найдена и устранена там, где я не ожидала найти.
Только и всего-то.
…
❤244👍56😁15😢1
Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @Happyvrot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Девочки, пиарщики Гельтек очень просят вашего мнения по поводу смены упаковки🙏🏼
Составы те же, но дизайн новый.
ФОТО ниже.
⬅️старый дизайн упаковки67%
➡️новый дизайн упаковки33%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 31 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Микерина. Роды? Зови акушера! @mikeryna_sashaa · 190,627 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 11 August 2026
Переверзева вещает @pereverzeva_live · 47,294 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 26 August 2026
Двое в животе @dvoe_v_zhivote · 34,710 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 3 September 2026
Томаблум и по-бырику @bloom_tomabloom · 31,413 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 6 September 2026
Olechkin_durdom @olechkindurdom · 52,165 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 24 August 2026
Natasha.ffb @natasha_ffb_tyt · 39,703 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 30 August 2026
Кристина Русинович @russinovich_kristina · 133,555 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 6 September 2026
Vovchenkomarina @vovchenkomarina_official · 36,499 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 1 September 2026
Lyalya_frutti @lyalya_frutti_channel · 52,930 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 24 August 2026
Nasty Tasty party @nastia_tasty · 31,355 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 6 September 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Вротвамсчастья” (@Happyvrot), 19,852 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Happyvrot.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.