Parenting & family — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 41 days, net -473. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 39,514–40,129 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 14:01
39,585
-21
15 Sept 2026, 10:59
39,606
-18
13 Sept 2026, 21:21
39,624
-13
12 Sept 2026, 02:57
39,637
-28
9 Sept 2026, 20:16
39,665
-38
6 Sept 2026, 11:59
39,703
-39
4 Sept 2026, 04:59
39,742
-24
2 Sept 2026, 15:05
39,766
-15
1 Sept 2026, 11:14
39,781
-15
31 Aug 2026, 10:36
39,796
-21
30 Aug 2026, 10:48
39,817
-9
29 Aug 2026, 12:12
39,826
-7
28 Aug 2026, 13:35
39,833
-12
27 Aug 2026, 12:34
39,845
-17
26 Aug 2026, 11:14
39,862
-25
25 Aug 2026, 10:22
39,887
-14
24 Aug 2026, 10:57
39,901
-15
22 Aug 2026, 20:45
39,916
-12
21 Aug 2026, 08:27
39,928
-1
20 Aug 2026, 07:26
39,929
first reading
Engagement
24 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 87 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
14.5%
avg views ÷ 39,585 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,760
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.81%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 24 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026
Posts held
24 (27 July 2026 – 21 September 2026)
Views total
63,320
Reactions total
1,145
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Sept 2026, 23:26 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
676
Videos
627
Links
63
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
15m 35s
Average length
47s
Measured directly from 20 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,983 reactions across 23 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,480
49.6%
🔥
375
12.6%
🙏
239
8.01%
💔
228
7.64%
👍
221
7.41%
🥰
181
6.07%
😢
149
4.99%
😱
42
1.41%
🤣
25
0.838%
👏
13
0.436%
🤩
12
0.402%
😭
8
0.268%
👌
4
0.134%
❤🔥
3
0.101%
🎃
2
0.067%
🤗
1
0.034%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,983 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 24 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @natasha_ffb_tyt. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 24 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 21 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Грудка, которая вам точно понравится!
Мясо не кипит и не жарится, а томится. Сочность остаётся внутри. Пропекается равномерно, без сухих краёв.
Нужно:
— куриная грудка (2 половинки)
— вода 1 л
— соль 1,5 ст. ложки
— масло оливковое 30 мл
— перец чёрный 0,5 ч. ложки
— чеснок сушёный 1 ч. ложка
1. Растворить соль в воде, залить грудку, убрать в холодильник на ночь (минимум 2 часа).
2. Обсушить салфетками.
3. Смешать …
Ох это легендарное видео от Тимура 😂
Во-первых я просила записать сторис девочкам, чтобы не переживали.
Вышел пост во всё лицо)))
Так он ведь тут ещё ошибся с весом младенца. Это меня особенно возмутило😡
Этим летом, моим фаворитом освежающего кофе стал именно эспрессо-тоник, и именно с этим сиропом!
Уже не помню где я его попробовала, но все остальные напитки ушли на второй план.
Поэтому я решила устроить себе маленькую кофейню прямо дома. Тем более в METRO проходит фестиваль кофе, и можно сразу купить всё необходимое: хороший кофе, сиропы и десерты по очень приятным ценам🔥
Для своего эспрессо-тоника я выбрала Cof…
Собираем торт «Золотой ключик» Часть 2👇
Для пропитки:
Вода - 150 мл
Сахар - 100 г
Коньяк - 1 столовая ложка (добавлять только в остывший сироп)
Для крема:
Масло сливочное 82,5% (мягкое, комнатной температуры) - 300 г
Варёная сгущёнка (хорошая) - 380 г
Каждый бисквит разрезать вдоль на 2–3 пласта толщиной примерно 1 см.
Сироп: вода + сахар, вскипятить, варить 2 минуты. Полностью остудить. Влить коньяк.
Крем: масло…
Торт «Золотой ключик»
Рецепт бисквита:
Ванильный (светлый) бисквит:
· Яйца (С1) — 5 шт.
· Сахар — 150 г
· Мука в/с — 150 г
· Ванилин — на кончике ножа
Шоколадный (тёмный) бисквит:
· Яйца (С1) — 5 шт.
· Сахар — 150 г
· Мука в/с — 120 г
· Какао-порошок — 30 г
· Ванилин — на кончике ножа
1. Яйца комнатной температуры соединить с 150 г сахара и ванилином.
2. Взбивать 8–10 минут на высокой скорости.
Масса должна стать …
Какая я душная стала, ужас🙈🤣
Сама знаю. Но это у меня своего рода профдеформация случилась.
Логопед сказал, что Дарину обязательно надо поправлять. В её случае важен самоконтроль.
И я теперь на автомате поправляю всех😂
В этом учебном году логопеда оставляем, летний отдых был показательным, она расслабилась и появилась «каша». А с началом школы откат вообще ожидаем из-за нагрузки, так что профилактические занятия е…
Марго требовала вызвать полицию🙈
Обидно конечно, для неё это, что-то чего раньше не могло случиться.
А я была рада, что хоть быстро нашли, а то она из меня душу бы вынула.
У неё такой шок, мы же ещё настрощали, что ни в коем случае ничего не поднимать на улице, это опасно. А её кошелек и подняли, и деньги себе забрали🙈
Наши сборы в школу)
Начнем с первоклашки☺️
Форма у нас отшивалась на весь класс. Это удобно, приехали, померили, забрали.
Магазин «Мир формы», взяли там:
- сарафан
- парадную блузку
- повседневную блузку с коротким рукавом
- жилетку
- юбку
- футболку белую
- жакет
- колготки набрала
ВЫШЛО НА 17тр
Рюкзаки заказала на Ламоде, оба “grizzly”, забрали второй - 4.666руб
Обувь тоже через Ламоду:
- туфли Ecco 5тр
- кеды E…
❤43👍9😢2
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @natasha_ffb_tyt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@natasha_ffb_tyt edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
1 September 2026
Most recent edit
1 September 2026
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Крис блог🍿 @p_s_krisss · 90,188 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 17 August 2026
Andreamamik LIVE @andreamamikk · 44,580 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 28 August 2026
АНАСТАВАНГА @anastavanga · 47,461 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 26 August 2026
БЕЗУДЕРЖНОЕ ВЕСЕЛЬЕ @bezuderjnoe_veselie · 33,764 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 3 September 2026
Томаблум и по-бырику @bloom_tomabloom · 31,287 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 6 September 2026
mommy_to_eva @mommy_to_eva · 92,881 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 16 August 2026
Nasty Tasty party @nastia_tasty · 31,289 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 6 September 2026
Panochka Выплаты и пособия @panochka_yanochkatut · 37,088 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 1 September 2026
Didenko.katerina @provizordidenko · 57,483 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 23 August 2026
НЕСЮ НЕСЁТ | ЭКОРАЗНОС @the_nesya · 40,778 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 30 August 2026
alenka.morozik @alenkamorozik · 101,160 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 15 August 2026
Tobolator @tobolator · 51,112 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 25 August 2026
❤️🔥istinaglagolova Life❤️🔥 @istinaglagolova · 41,751 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 29 August 2026
Переверзева вещает @pereverzeva_live · 47,137 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 26 August 2026
Двое в животе @dvoe_v_zhivote · 34,582 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 3 September 2026
Lyalya_frutti @lyalya_frutti_channel · 52,705 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 24 August 2026
Доктор Крис @doktor_kris · 56,807 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 23 August 2026
Семья mom_amam❤️ @mom_aamam · 34,488 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 2 September 2026
Катя ин Майами @katarina_elenik · 50,843 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 28 August 2026
ЛАЙФХАКИ | ПП РЕЦЕПТЫ | РЕЦЕПТЫ | ПОЛЕЗНЫЕ СОВЕТЫ @mama_2h · 105,743 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 14 August 2026
Mamalapatundelya @mamalapatundel · 32,567 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 5 September 2026
Раиса Фудблогер РЕЦЕПТЫ ЕДА @raisa_alibekova · 74,230 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 19 August 2026
❣️Botanovna пишет❣️ @botanovnalevda · 93,212 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 16 August 2026
Boltalka_na_pp @boltalka_pp · 41,056 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 29 August 2026
This channel appears in 29 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Natasha.ffb” (@natasha_ffb_tyt), 39,585 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/natasha_ffb_tyt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.