29 measurements spanning 33 days, net +86. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 80,934–81,223 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Sept 2026, 20:00
81,108
-41
5 Sept 2026, 12:19
81,149
+73
3 Sept 2026, 14:58
81,076
-15
2 Sept 2026, 11:34
81,091
-26
1 Sept 2026, 10:34
81,117
+5
31 Aug 2026, 12:07
81,112
+21
30 Aug 2026, 15:17
81,091
+1
29 Aug 2026, 18:15
81,090
+3
28 Aug 2026, 20:05
81,087
-12
27 Aug 2026, 20:06
81,099
+40
26 Aug 2026, 22:58
81,059
+8
25 Aug 2026, 23:18
81,051
+4
24 Aug 2026, 20:57
81,047
-10
23 Aug 2026, 03:48
81,057
-39
21 Aug 2026, 16:45
81,096
-17
20 Aug 2026, 12:38
81,113
-20
19 Aug 2026, 11:53
81,133
-18
18 Aug 2026, 14:53
81,151
-18
17 Aug 2026, 14:54
81,169
+3
16 Aug 2026, 05:25
81,166
first reading
Engagement
57 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 41 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
18.5%
avg views ÷ 81,108 subscribers
Avg views / post
15,000
40 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.996%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
40
of 57 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026
Posts held
57 (2 August 2026 – 24 August 2026)
Views total
598,930
Reactions total
5,967
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
25 Aug 2026, 00:49 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
25m 07s
Average length
2m 06s
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
8,888 reactions across 57 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
2,351
26.5%
❤
1,308
14.7%
🔥
1,271
14.3%
😱
1,051
11.8%
😁
874
9.83%
🤣
646
7.27%
🤯
330
3.71%
🎉
235
2.64%
🕊
111
1.25%
😨
107
1.20%
✍
86
0.968%
❤🔥
73
0.821%
👌
71
0.799%
🙏
67
0.754%
🎃
56
0.63%
💯
53
0.596%
😢
46
0.518%
🤔
39
0.439%
👻
35
0.394%
😇
27
0.304%
11 further kinds
51
0.574%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 57 of the 57 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,888 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 57 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @MashkovDima. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 57 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 24 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
1.75%
1 of 57 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
14,300
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
14,000
over 56 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
CQH36pWzJppiGMytS4ysfybGwwHFNHAEE2Yd9Kz43he6Ss
1
6 August 2026
6 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 24 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Короче дело было так: Звонит мне Никитос и говорит, что надо помочь купить новую машину от дилера, а опыта 0 ✍🏻
—
Вводные такие: Тойота Королла досталась в наследство и на учете уже не стоит + есть часть денег и остаток в рассрочку хочет 0,01% которая.
—
Поможете? Запросто!
Машина это новинка относительная от Джили гибрид. Нынче популярна и цена её 3.814.990 официальная! 🚙
—
ВНИМАНИЕ! Сейчас на эти гибриды спрос огро…
Новый выпуск https://youtu.be/UYWtopI4UAk?si=93XitgS_bJU5TNwr
Ждёт вас!
—
Жили в у себя в родном регионе Кемеровская область, город Новокузнецк и было три квартиры, дети растут, работа хорошая есть, но всегда хотели уехать и на то были причины. Новая жизнь в новой Москве, как это? В 30 км от МКАД в полях строят дома, а люди их активно покупают, почему? В этом выпуске мы детально разберем интересную историю из жизни, …
Решил посмотреть в Интернете доставку бензина к машине)
Тема то популяная, но первые 4 конторы говорят бензина нет на доставку так как АЗС в канистры не отпускают.
А вот 5-ый звонок и человек говорит 100-ый (и любой другой) есть в наличии и готовы привезти прям сейчас.
Круто? Конечно думаю я и спрашиваю, а цена какая? 100 рублей за литр 100-ого и по сути берём!
Но вот тут нюанс, что услуга доставки платная, но считаю…
10,000₽ за парковочное место в месяц во дворе это своего дома в Подмосковье ближайшем это много или мало? Или нормально?
—
Пообщался с жителями и говорят это дохрена! Мол 5,000р норм, а лучше 3000 в месяц.
Showing the 12 most recent of 57 posts we hold for @MashkovDima. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Максим Шелков @Maxim_Shelkov · 140,139 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 August 2026
AUTO FACT YouTube @autofactpodbor · 44,765 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 28 August 2026
Михаил Кульдяев @MKuldiaev · 52,493 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 24 August 2026
Lisarulit @lisarulit777 · 267,056 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 August 2026
Миша Яковлев @mishayakov · 29,593 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 8 September 2026
K-POWER (Наб.Челны) @k_power_tuning · 62,721 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 21 August 2026
Geely Russia @geelyofficial · 246,234 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 15 August 2026
ЗЕМСТАНДАРТ @zems · 48,947 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
CHERY Russia @cheryru · 64,661 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 21 August 2026
Гитара с нуля @konograi · 125,203 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
МПЦ - Юридическая сеть @mpcrf · 100,104 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 August 2026
Ярдрей - юридический канал @yardrey · 165,012 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
ЖЖГИСЬ @zhzhgiss · 132,890 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 August 2026
НеФормат | Сергей Смирнов @smirnov_neformat · 31,208 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 6 September 2026
Смирнов Недвижимость | Vysotsky Estate @ogo_nedviga · 80,820 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Машков YouTube про Авто и Недвижку” (@MashkovDima), 81,108 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MashkovDima.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.