⚠️ #پیشنهاد_ویژه ⚠️ 🔥 حتما ویدیو آموزشی بالا روببینید بازی ساده و بسیار شیرینی که راحت میشه میشه ازش کلی پول درآورد👌🏼 🤩🤩 درصد شارژ بیشتر با هربار شارژ برای بازی مرغ ⭐ 📣یکمیلیون شارژ کن ⬅️⬇️ 6,000,000 میلیون موجودی بگیر 💻 betinja.bet

Channel
رادیو فان | Radio Fun
@Radi0fun
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
105,154subscribers
-2,746 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001893781792 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Radi0fun |
| Description | به دنیای فان ما خوش اومدید😍 همرا با چالش های شبانه باحال🤞🏼😻✌🏻 تبلیغاتی که قرار میگیره نه تایید میکنیم نه رد پس لطفا قبل هر کاری از صحت آن مطلع شوید. مسئولیتی در این قبال نداریم تبلیغات و ارسال سوژه : |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 48 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Radi0fun |
Topic
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Oct 2026, 02:45 | 105,154 | +333 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 01:41 | 104,821 | +426 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 23:59 | 104,395 | +387 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 01:10 | 104,008 | +493 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 20:51 | 103,515 | +499 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 16:38 | 103,016 | +346 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 19:17 | 102,670 | +577 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 16:00 | 102,093 | +603 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 17:45 | 101,490 | +626 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 20:26 | 100,864 | +39 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 18:38 | 100,825 | -122 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 13:19 | 100,947 | -364 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 16:37 | 101,311 | -299 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 11:59 | 101,610 | -565 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 09:38 | 102,175 | -1,134 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 20:38 | 103,309 | -206 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 16:59 | 103,515 | -169 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 00:02 | 103,684 | -190 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 08:58 | 103,874 | -221 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 04:57 | 104,095 | first reading |
Engagement
1,156 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 161 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.00%
- avg views ÷ 105,154 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,100
- 427 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.47%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 427
- of 1,156 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 314 of 427 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,156 (6 August 2026 – 24 October 2026) |
| Views total | 897,195 |
| Reactions total | 9,922 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Oct 2026, 03:06 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈11,300
- Videos
- ≈900
- Links
- ≈7,650
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 56m 07s
- Average length
- 31s
Measured directly from 108 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
24,456 reactions across 702 posts, in 52 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 11,365 | 46.5% | |
| 👍 | 2,103 | 8.60% | |
| 🖕 | 1,850 | 7.56% | |
| ❤ | 1,720 | 7.03% | |
| 😐 | 988 | 4.04% | |
| 💔 | 977 | 3.99% | |
| 🤮 | 784 | 3.21% | |
| 😁 | 765 | 3.13% | |
| 👎 | 671 | 2.74% | |
| 👏 | 600 | 2.45% | |
| 💩 | 544 | 2.22% | |
| 🔥 | 374 | 1.53% | |
| 🤯 | 330 | 1.35% | |
| 🗿 | 247 | 1.01% | |
| 🥰 | 160 | 0.654% | |
| 😢 | 122 | 0.499% | |
| 😱 | 87 | 0.356% | |
| 🍌 | 83 | 0.339% | |
| 👌 | 72 | 0.294% | |
| 😭 | 65 | 0.266% | |
| 32 further kinds | 549 | 2.24% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 731 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24,456 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 16 August 2026 to 24 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 2
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 2
- of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 0.2%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Radi0fun. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 16 August 2026 to 24 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
📣هرچی شارژ کنی 🤩 برابر موجودی میگیری با بونوس 🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ 🤩🤩درصد شارژ اضافی ویژه این بازی: 🖱به راحتی کسب درامد کن 💵💰 فقط کافیه شکارچی خوبی باشی و مرغ هارو شکار کنی و پولت چند برابر کنی😍💵 🟢 ویدیو #آموزش بازی chicky choice رو براتون گذاشتم خیلی راحت و بدون ریسک و میتونی بازی کنی و کلی پول دربیاری🔥 💖 حتما ویدیو رو تا انتها ببینید 💻 betinja.bet 💻 betinja.bet 🌐 کانال بونوس های رایگان @betinjabet ✅ شرطبندی از طریق ربات a
🔴 ژنرال محسن رضایی : میتوانیم ساعت رسمی کشور را 24 ساعت جلو بکشیم، اینگونه وقتی دشمن میخواهد به ما حمله کند ما در فردا هستیم و زودتر خبر دار میشویم! 💖ربات دوستیابی 💖ربات جرات حقیقت ⚠️ @Radi0Fun 🔞
🤣84❤2👏2😐2
برم ببینم ناشناس من چه خبره ناشناس من: 💖ربات دوستیابی 💖ربات جرات حقیقت ⚠️ @Radi0Fun 🔞
😁15🤣6
من و اونی که هیچ جوره نمیتونیم اکس هم باشیم: 💖ربات دوستیابی 💖ربات جرات حقیقت ⚠️ @Radi0Fun 🔞
🤣18❤4🔥2
💖 دو میلیون شارژ کن ⬅️⬇️ 12,000,000 میلیون موجودی بگیر و باهاش بازی حساس امشب #چلسی و #تاتنهام رو پیشبینی کن. #بدون_ریسک #بدون _استرس 💻 betinja.bet
💖دو میلیون شارژ کن ⬅️⬇️ 12,000,000 میلیون موجودی بگیر 👍بهترین شرایط برای چندین برابر کردن سرمایه توی #بت_اینجا فراهم شده. 📣هرچی شارژ کنی 🤩 برابر موجودی میگیری با بونوس 🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ 💳 واریز درگاه #ریالی و امکان کارت به کارت و واریز از طریق کریپتو 💻لینک سایت بازی: 💻 betinja.bet 💻 betinja.bet 🌐 کانال بونوس های رایگان @betinjabet ✅ شرطبندی از طریق ربات g2: @Betinja_bot
یه پسره با دوست دخترش کات کرده که دختره فردای کات پاشده رفته جلو خونه طرف و یه بسته کاندوم با یه دست نوشته گزاشته جلوی در پارکینگ روش نوشته : تکثیر نشو لعنتی! 💖ربات دوستیابی 💖ربات جرات حقیقت ⚠️ @Radi0Fun 🔞
🤣42😁2😐2
یه سری از این تاپیک هایی که تو نینی سایت هست تروله:)))) از ذوق بچه دار شدیم؟؟؟؟؟؟؟ذوق کنید کاندوم یادتون میره😂 💖ربات دوستیابی 💖ربات جرات حقیقت ⚠️ @Radi0Fun 🔞
🤣36❤1
صبحی که اینطوری بخیر نشه رو باید شاشید توش:)))) 💖ربات دوستیابی 💖ربات جرات حقیقت ⚠️ @Radi0Fun 🔞
🤮23❤5👍2😁2😍1
قیمت جدید اعضای بدن: کبد کامل: ۵ میلیارد قرنیه چشم: ۵۰۰ میلیون بیضه: ۳۰ میلیارد مغز استخوان: ۱۵ میلیارد هر کلیه: ۳۰ میلیارد قلب سالم: ۷۰ میلیارد 💖ربات دوستیابی 💖ربات جرات حقیقت ⚠️ @Radi0Fun 🔞
😭12❤2💔2🗿1
✈️ اپلیکیشن MelBet 🥇 🎁 کد هدیه 100 دلاری: Sport100 🔒 برای تعیین رمز ورود حداقل از 8 کاراکتر و حروف بزرگ و کوچک انگلیسی و اعداد انگلیسی استفاده کنید، مانند Hamid120 r2 🇮🇷 برای تغییر زبان برنامه، زبان موبایل خود را تغییر دهید. ✅ ورود به اپلیکیشن بدون فیلترشکن
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,156 posts we hold for @Radi0fun. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@Joraathaqiiqaatbot · 10,003659 postsمل بت
@melbet_chaneel · 34,22435 postsBetinja
@betinjabet · 84831 postsکانال شرطبندی دربی کلاب
@derbybetm · 158,12023 postsVorex
@vorexofficial · 2,17312 postsMelBet | مل بت
@MelBet_Iran1 · 204,66311 posts4xBet
@Bet4xinfo · 6,8356 posts1xbet channel
@onexbetiranm · 41,5486 posts𝗧𝗮𝗯𝗮𝗻𝗶 | 𝗠𝗮𝗳𝗶𝗮
@tabani_mafia · 30,7786 postsآموزش وان ایکس بت
@Education_iran_wanx · 10,7995 postsوان ایکس بت
@onexbet_iran_chanel · 57,0975 postsوان ایکس بت | وانيكس بت | 1XBET
@one_Mn85m_xbet · 30,3224 posts𝗧𝗶𝗽𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿 | 𝗠𝗮𝗳𝗶𝗮
@Tipster_Mafiaa · 14,1514 posts𝗧𝗶𝗽𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿 | 𝗣𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗶𝗮𝗻 تیپستر پرشین
@Tipster_Persians · 2,6533 posts[💉 آمپول بازی 💉 🙈 ]
@ampulbazy · 353,1452 posts𝐇𝐚𝐉 | 𝐅𝐢𝐱𝐞𝐝
@HaJFixed · 6,5442 postsHUNTER BET
@HUNTTER_BET · 7,0842 postsکُصشعر
@periodi · 174,6922 postsWinro.io
@winro_io · 6,9192 posts🟢 ربات فیلم کده | رایگان
@Filmro5_bot · 18,0871 postNBA
@NBA2kBet · 29,6291 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@Radi0fun named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 19 September 2026 – 19 September 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@futballbadtv · 319,730#1
@bistodo · 387,941#2
@TweetyChannel · 818,066#3
@MidonstiOrg · 63,885#4
@FutballBadBoys · 107,520#5
@vaarzesh_plus · 337,062#6
@ir_javan · 637,587#7
@Radiokocsher · 1,130,580#8
@MemeHubOriginal · 93,871#9
@SportBaadNews · 856,994#10
@drtel · 783,986#11
@varzesh3 · 1,295,327#12
@MARIZMEDIA · 55,154#13
@raptv · 383,147#14
@bistodo_tweet · 29,015#15
@funhiphop · 270,227#16
@Comentiat · 403,693#17
@badgram · 618,500#18
@CrazyTweet · 137,181#19
@twite_hub · 133,815#20
@FUTBALLI18 · 479,671#21
@hiitsong · 35,057#22
@Codeain · 346,306#23
@FutballBoys · 144,271#24
@initiatur · 202,704#25
@SportBadTweet · 139,057#26
@oqolmoqol · 253,444#27
@tweet_varzeshplus · 31,902#28
@CommentMelat · 277,158#29
@ashkan_kagan · 118,843#30
@Twitter_69 · 16,221#31
@whatsmusic · 2,087,190#32
@efshagari · 654,847#33
@iRoProxy · 7,959,523#34
@iMTProto · 7,633,845#35
@RegaPlus · 1,495,122#36
@rapking · 310,043#37
@hamclasixii · 99#38
@razcom · 1,220,193#39
@proxy_qavi · 3,292,724#40
@HipHopTweety · 264,208#41
@darkproxy · 4,634,296#42
@CottageOrg · 758,418#43
@proxydaemi · 1,743,831#44
@NPROXY · 2,305,538#45
@Herochnl · 422,119#46
@hip_hopi · 360,513#47
@roidbest · 1,626,145#48
@Barca_We · 298,647#49
@chekhabarre · 243,295#50
@ParsTwt · 519,352#51
@EsteghlalFc_We · 380,145#52
@RapGodNews · 189,872#53
@nikotiinn_text · 459,914#54
@EfshaKhabar · 271,089#55
@Ye_DaneshAmoz · 1,013,889#56
@Realmadrid_we · 299,876#57
@akh_mam · 180,496#58
@Maagas · 709,496#59
@newsbin · 1,226,153#60
@Bad_Twitty · 821,062#61
@meme_ol_ski · 217,891#62
@bistodo_ir · 140,274#63
@YouBgo · 131,308#64
@RapPlusNews · 85,915#65
@Mozkhrfats · 901,331#66
@RapBad_Newz · 250,063#67
@Comentive · 201,422#68
@Afkar · 1,017,795#69
@tweet_Khabari · 620,459#70
@iran_efsha_news · 1,383,295#71
@AYNHE · 72,054#72
@ParalWorld · 235,422#73
@lordcryptovip · 771,537#74
@Memwe_land · 22,957#75
@khabarforieh · 195,896#76
@cryptonews_lessons · 89,527#77
@kianaafr · 404,913#78
@officialpersiatwiter · 568,822#79
@proxymtproto · 11,887,259#80
@Myporoxy · 4,523,880#81
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@MidonstiOrg · 63,885
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 22 August 2026
@LinkdoniXe · 265,636
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 10 August 2026
@TvAspirin · 107,208
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 August 2026
@CrazyTweet · 137,181
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 12 August 2026
@Jafarabad85 · 97,564
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 16 August 2026
@Secrets_Box · 77,903
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 21 August 2026
@abs_olut · 45,515
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 26 August 2026
@EmperorOfProtest · 51,753
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 August 2026
@HotLove · 76,682
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 25 August 2026
@Dokhtar_shergo · 93,505
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 16 August 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“رادیو فان | Radio Fun” (@Radi0fun), 105,154 subscribers as measured 25 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Radi0fun.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.