Channel
@Rasooll_Allah
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
31,246subscribers
-1,591 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001274224668 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Rasooll_Allah |
| Description | لسنا مجرد متابعين… نحن قلوبٌ أحبّت، ونفوسٌ تهتدي بنوره، وتشتاق لوجهه الكريم. في هذه المساحة… نُحيي سنّته، نرتوي من سيرته، ونتعلّم من خُلقه، نصلّي عليه، ونمشي على أثره… فالحبيب ﷺ هو النور الذي لا يخبو. |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 63 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Rasooll_Allah |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 01:25 | 31,246 | -9 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 00:26 | 31,255 | -10 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 21:10 | 31,265 | -19 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 23:59 | 31,284 | -9 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 01:39 | 31,293 | -11 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 02:38 | 31,304 | -14 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 01:29 | 31,318 | -27 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 01:07 | 31,345 | -9 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 23:31 | 31,354 | -21 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 21:21 | 31,375 | -24 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 23:00 | 31,399 | -15 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 20:00 | 31,414 | -12 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 18:17 | 31,426 | -17 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 21:37 | 31,443 | -12 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 23:57 | 31,455 | -14 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 21:19 | 31,469 | -25 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 15:36 | 31,494 | -31 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 12:59 | 31,525 | -33 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 10:56 | 31,558 | -23 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 09:54 | 31,581 | first reading |
108 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 163 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 108 (22 July 2026 – 4 November 2026) |
| Views total | 15,067 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 10:56 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 7 of 24 posts held from the last 30 days (29.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
لمن يحبون الأجواء الصباحية وتفاصيلها الساحرة.. ☕️🌿 كل ما يخص الصباح بشتى جماله: إشراقات دافئة، همسات تلامس الروح، خواطر تُروى بحبر الحرف، وصور تأسر العين. تعال لنعيش معاً أجمل بدايات النهار في ركننا الهادئ:👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 https://t.me/+ZcacA79TwWU0NTE0 https://t.me/+ZcacA79TwWU0NTE0
"تذكروا بالدعاء اليمن الجريحة؛ أرض الصبر والأوجاع، التي لا يزال أفقها ينتظر فجر الفرج.. فـ غيث الدعاء إن سقط على أرض الحزن، أزهر فيها أملًا جديدًا. ـــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ
عن أبي هريرة رضي الله عنه : أن رسول الله ﷺ ذكر يوم الجمعة، فقال : " فيه ساعة لا يوافقها عبد مسلم، وهو قائم يصلي يسأل الله تعالى شيئا، إلا أعطاه إياه ". وأشار بيده يقللها ". 📚رواه البخاري 935 يوافقها: يصادفها ويقصدها ويتحراها بالدعاء. أشار بيده يقللها: يشير إلى أنها وقت قليل. ـــــــــــــــــــ 🍃🌹🍃 ــــــــــــــــــ https://t.me/Rasooll_Allah
ـــــــــــ " وبعد العصرِ ساعةُ استجابة فلا همًّا ترون ولا كآبة وعافى اللهُ من يشكي همومًا وضيقًا في الحياةِ إذا أصابه ونلتم من جنانِ الخلدِ حظًّا مع المختار ِفيها والصّحابة " ـــــــــــــــــــ 🍃🌹🍃 ــــــــــــــــــ https://t.me/Rasooll_Allah
ـــــــــــــــ أهل السنة والجماعة تقبل شهادتهم على كل الفرق. ✍🏻قال شيخ الإسلام ابن تيمية رحمه الله: " ولهذا لما كان أهل السنة والجماعة 👈🏻 الذين محضوا الإسلام ولم يشوبوه بغيره، 👈🏻 كانت شهادتهم مقبولة على سائر فرق الأمة بخلاف أهل البدع والأهواء ، 📌كالخوارج والروافض ، فإن بينهم من العداوة والظلم ما يخرجهم عن كمال هذه الحقيقة التي جعلها الله لأهل السنة ، ✍🏻قال النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم فيهم: «يحمل هذا العلم من ك…
ـــــــــــــــ #الفرقة_الناجية. ✍🏻 قال شيخ الإسلام ابن تيمية رحمه الله: " أحقّ الناس بأن تكون هي الفرقة الناجية 👈🏻أهل الحديث والسنة؛ 👈🏻 الذين ليس لهم متبوع يتعصبون له 👈🏻إلا رسول الله -ﷺ-، وهم أعلم الناس بأقواله وأحواله وأعظمهم تمييزا بين صحيحها وسقيمها وأئمتهم فقهاء فيها وأهل معرفة بمعانيها واتباعا لها؛ تصديقا وعملا وحبا وموالاة لمن والاها ومعاداة لمن عاداها". 📕مجموع الفتاوى (جـ٣صـ٣٤٧). ـــــــــــــــــــ 🍃🌹…
[(بيان فساد منهج الحوثيين واستهدافهم الشنيع لمكة..]) الشيخ صالح بن فوزان الفوزان حفظه الله.
هذه عقيدة الرافضة في كعبة المسلمين، وبالأدلة من كتبهم المعتمدة، حتى لا يغرنكم الحوثي الرافضي بكذبه وخداعه، وأنه لا يقصد مقدسات المسلمين..!
تحصَّنوا بدعاء ربِّكم، وارموا به عدوَّكم، فحفظ الله لكم: حصنُكم الحَصين، ودرعكم المتين، فادعوا بما كان به يدعو النَّبيُّ ﷺ: «اللَّهمَّ إنَّا نجعلُك في نحورهم، ونعوذُ بك من شرورهم»، وكان يقول: «اللَّهمَّ منزلَ الكتاب، ومُجريَ السَّحاب، وهازمَ الأحزاب، اهزمْهُم وانصرنا عليهم». 📝 الشيخ صالح العصيمي
صدق من قال التَّاريخ يُعيد نفسه؛ فالإرهاب الحوثيُّ يسير على خطى إبرهة الأشرم في غزو مكَّة، واعتراضِ وفد الله القاصدينَ بيته، ويُعينه على إجرامه أحفاد القرامطة الذين قتلوا الحُجَّاج، واقتلعوا الحجر الأسود، وسينزل بهم سخط الله ونقمته على أيدي عباده، وإنَّ ساعتهم لقريبةٌ فاستبشروا. ١ جمادى الأولى ١٤٤٨ 📝 الشيخ صالح العصيمي
● قال الشيخ ابن عثيمين رحمه الله: ومن آثار السُّنة الحميدةِ: اكتساب الإنسانِ من أخلاق النبيّ ﷺ؛ فإنّ النبيّ ﷺ بُعِثَ ليُتمّم مكارِم الأخلاقِ، وقد جَبَلَه اللهُ على أكرمِ الأخلاقِ؛ وإذا كان الإنسان مُتمسّكاً بسنّته، فسوف يكون على خلق يُحمدُ عليه، ويُقرّبُه إلى الله عزّوجلّ؛ لأنّ النبيّ ﷺ قالَ: ( أكملُ المؤمنين إيماناً: أحسنهم خُلُقًا ). 📜: التّمسُّكُ بالسنّة النبويّة وآثارُه (ص١٤) ـــــــــــــــــــ 🍃🌹🍃 ــــــــــ…
●قال الشيخ ابن عثيمين رحمه الله: أنّ المُتمَسّكَ بالسُّنةِ يكون قُدوةً ويكونُ إمامًا، ولا يدخُلُ أحدٌ عليه بخللٍ؛ لأنّ الذي يقومُ بالعبادةِ تقليداً لإمامٍ من أئمةِ المسلمين: قد يَدخلُ عليه بعضُ الخللِ، وبكل سُهولةٍ يمكنُ أن يُقال لهُ: (ما دليلُكَ على هذا؟ )؛ لكنّ المتمسّكَ بالسُّنة لا يستطيع أحدٌ أن يُدخِلَ عليه، إذا قالَ: ( ما دليلُك؟ )، قال: ( هذا فِعلُ الرسول ﷺ ) إن كان فعلاً، أو ( هذا قوله ) إن كان قولاً؛ فهو في…
Showing the 12 most recent of 108 posts we hold for @Rasooll_Allah. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 30 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
س²⁰/ غزوة الفاضحة هي؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
س¹⁸/ عدد جيش المسلمين في غزوة مؤتة؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
س¹⁹/ ما هي الغزوة التي سميت بالفرقان؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
س¹⁷/ أسلم أبو سفيان في السنة؟
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
س¹⁶/ فتح مكة كانت في السنة؟
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
س¹⁵/ غزوة مؤتة كانت في السنة؟
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 108 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 4 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 5 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مُحبي رسول الله ﷺ” (@Rasooll_Allah), 31,246 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Rasooll_Allah.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.