Sticker, posted without a caption

Channel
🍂🍃 وَرَتِّلِ الْقُرْآنَ (أيمن سويد) 🍃
@Ratelelquran
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
44,148subscribers
-215 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001002643835 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Ratelelquran |
| Description | ▪قناة متخصصة في شرح أحكام التجويد كاملة *فيديوهات* قصيرة تتراوح بين 5 و 10 دقائق من دورة أحكام التجويد للشيخ أيمن سويد حفظه الله. . مع▪ *صور* ▪شرح المقدمة الجزرية. 🗃️فهرس لسهولة الوصول إلى الدروس |
| Created | Between 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Ratelelquran |
Topic
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 18:21 | 44,148 | -15 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 19:02 | 44,163 | -16 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 01:40 | 44,179 | +15 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 07:38 | 44,164 | +2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 05:21 | 44,162 | -12 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 21:38 | 44,174 | +4 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 11:35 | 44,170 | +5 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 22:16 | 44,165 | -7 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 17:04 | 44,172 | -8 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:12 | 44,180 | -8 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 17:08 | 44,188 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:55 | 44,189 | +10 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 16:43 | 44,179 | -28 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 17:36 | 44,207 | +7 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 19:55 | 44,200 | +4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:35 | 44,196 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:18 | 44,198 | -37 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 21:12 | 44,235 | +7 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 13:34 | 44,228 | -22 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:45 | 44,250 | first reading |
Engagement
296 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 91 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.539%
- avg views ÷ 44,148 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 238
- 183 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.214%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 183
- of 296 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 24 of 183 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 296 (16 July 2026 – 22 September 2026) |
| Views total | 43,543 |
| Reactions total | 39 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 09:40 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 946
- Videos
- 910
- Links
- 635
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 2h 02m
- Average length
- 3m 58s
Measured directly from 31 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
77 reactions across 41 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 53 | 68.8% | |
| 👍 | 21 | 27.3% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 2.60% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 1.30% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 45 of the 296 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 77 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 296 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Video, posted without a caption
❤1
🏙شرح الأربعين النووية مع الإجازة ⚖️ فقه العبادات📚 المواريث👇 t.me/AleayidunElaAllah/36724 📖 احفظ القرآن بدون نسيان خطوات عملية + تثبيت قوي للحفظ🏙 t.me/addlist/MwVvoBqMdRUyOWI8
📖 احفظ القرآن بإتقان… لا بأخطاء تتكرر! ✔️ صحّحي تلاوتك الآن مجانًا👇🏻 https://t.me/abag25/8296 💥 لماذا لا يفسد عسل النحل عبر السنين❓👇🏻 t.me/aleagaz/174040
📱حالات دينية 📱وتفاؤل للصباح والمساء 🌸🕋 📱اجعل حالتك اليوم صدقة جارية تريح بها قلوب أصدقائك 🧩📱 t.me/addlist/JgtarJZWxmE0Y2E0
🌟 إن كنت تبحث عن طريقة تعينك على رسوخ محفوظك من القرآن فهذا المحتوى يخصك👇🏼 https://t.me/fwayiid/20213 📲 لمحبي الواتساب(حالات قصيࢪة وࢪسائل)👇🏻 t.me/addlist/JgtarJZWxmE0Y2E0 💯للدعم @Al_foursan
🌸🌸 🌸🌸 🌱🌱🌱🌱🌱 حبيباتي الغاليات...وصُحبتنا في رحلتنا المباركة في حفظ كتاب الله...حياكم الله وبياكم وجعل الجنة مثوانا ومثواكم 🎉نُهنئ أَنفُسنا ونُهنِئكم بجمعنا الطيب في هذه الرحلة المباركة ،الحمد لله الذي يسّر لنا مدارسة وحفظ سورة البقرة إلى سورة هود في أكاديمية القرآن حياتي الطيبة باتقان، ولولا تيسيره وفضله سبحانه لَمَا سِرنا على هذا الطريق المبارك، ولَمَا بلغنا هدفنا* 🚨المجموعة للمستجدات فقط…
Sticker, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
تعلم نطق الكسرة والياء
🔔انضمي إلينا لتصحيح التلاوة، تعلم التجويد، وحفظ القرآن بخطوات ميسّرة للنساء🧕👇 t.me/abag25/20962 🎤أجمل الاناشيد بدون موسيقى➕ t.me/addlist/MwVvoBqMdRUyOWI8
Showing the 12 most recent of 296 posts we hold for @Ratelelquran. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Ratelelquran edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 23 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 9 September 2026
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@Al_foursan · 2,36971 posts🔔 فوائد و فرائد 🔔
@fwayiid · 213,80556 postsأكاديمية علوم القرآن والسُنَّة
@AleayidunElaAllah · 24,46855 posts📖 أكاديمية روح العالمية 📖
@abag25 · 25,97431 posts📘القـرآن حيـاة 📘
@Alquran_haya2026 · 2,67610 postsكنوز الإعجاز
@aleagaz · 25,1711 postخزائن الرحمن
@Alrahmn · 81,5421 postمع الرسول الكريم
@maaalrsol · 23,0511 postمكتــ📚ــبة أكاديمية القرآن حياتي
@maktabetelmoalema · 6,0231 post♡ منابر من نور..♡
@mnbrnor · 22,9331 postالحمـــ لله ـــد حتى ترضى صدقة جارية
@Sadakajarea · 17,5481 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@addanitadaborazzahrawatayn · 1,950#1
@Almedh · 4,789#2
@maktabetelmoalema · 6,023#3
@acdemyzainaletqaan · 40,824#4
@QuranQuestions11 · 9,501#5
@Alhouda_Wa_Rayhane · 7,838#6
@Academyzainaletqaan04 · 37,460#7
@tayyar_telawat · 3,239#8
@Tafseer2alSadi · 47,275#9
@aywmy2020 · 36,730#10
@rahiqi1 · 1,257#11
@TsgeelTadapr · 2,488#12
@hulah40 · 1,449#13
@listentohizbefromquran · 1,417 (as read 28 August 2026)#14
@emaniyh · 2,422#15
@dfatrwklm · 1,036#16
@Andro_2017 · 843#17
@wahaj_n · 3,503#18
@Estsharat333 · 3,252#19
@abag25 · 25,974#20
@atmanan5 · 648#21
@Quran_tst · 60,275#22
@Tafser_Myaser · 2,061#23
@Qbas1 · 591#24
@Draymanseweed2012 · 1,587#25
@harous_primary · 3,669#26
@telawaha · 1,087#27
@Islamicstickerfree · 1,013#28
@nssaa · 5,730#29
@Khalidruda · 12,856#30
@Albayanquran · 73,332#31
@zadtalb3lm · 1,563#32
@A7kamtjwed · 1,940#33
@hakerYE · 1,349#34
@Eletkan · 3,164#35
@lmsthood · 3,141#36
@to7fat_el_atfal · 5,322#37
@tayyar_mutashbehat · 8,411#38
@tagweed_Alquraan · 4,445#39
@notmic1 · 14,376#40
@lammsat · 10,116#41
@quran_tadapr · 4,652#42
@alhafez_80 · 3,372#43
@daily_3lm · 765#44
@kblsfn · 1,930#45
@noorel3lmbellaah · 5,501#46
@EIshaikhan · 19,160#47
@Fatimah_AlBishri · 2,956#48
@Einglish2004Tripoli · 2,689#49
@Ltaaif · 5,270#50
@MuaazalDaweek · 2,401#51
@Alrahmn · 81,542#52
@Read_and_ascend · 5,378#53
@ghawaly57r · 26,756#54
@Rui7b · 1,501#55
@alqawareir · 15,230#56
@GANTK3 · 22,779#57
@Lajon_K_q · 1,821#58
@hareth_Al_shamri1 · 13,322#59
@n_e57 · 5,264#60
@ifus8yv · 4,867#61
@basuoni · 6,519#62
@Roses7flowersR · 32,002#63
@umasekonbelketabahsanalqasas · 6,890#64
@khlesa21 · 2,438#65
@alamalonsa · 11,962#66
@tilawatchannel · 5,675#67
@quran_haseen2 · 3,579#68
@qutof_atharya · 5,165#69
@quran20022 · 1,341#70
@ahmad15000 · 4,073#71
@selm40 · 539#72
@quranmotashabehat · 3,896#73
@mobtaga17 · 5,411#74
@CryptosPNG · 533#75
@audiohatMaWaraalTabia · 3,683#76
@Elmalphones · 960#77
@PhdEnglishAlgeria · 7,821#78
@albayan_tadabor · 6,251#79
@SheikhMoHaMmEdHaSn2021 · 3,883#80
@Library_of_lslamic_Economics1446 · 3,369#81
@n7lhh · 6,694#82
@Salafi_s · 2,143#83
@fawaiedwad · 15,047#84
@D_aymansweid_quran · 5,715#85
@ktamjonkok · 204 (as read 28 August 2026)#86
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 28 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Tafseer2alSadi · 47,275
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 26 August 2026
@aywmy2020 · 36,730
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 1 September 2026
@abag25 · 25,974
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
@Quran_tst · 60,275
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 22 August 2026
@Academyzainaletqaan04 · 37,460
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 1 September 2026
@acdemyzainaletqaan · 40,824
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 30 August 2026
@Albayanquran · 73,332
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🍂🍃 وَرَتِّلِ الْقُرْآنَ (أيمن سويد) 🍃” (@Ratelelquran), 44,148 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ratelelquran.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.