Писатель, психолог, философ.
→ 30+ лет исследований души человека
→ 10 млн читателей по всему
→ 44 книги на 18 языках
Официальный канал. Зарегистрирован в реестре РКН: https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/67a4a5f5dc130259d5aa0bf4
Created
5 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 42 days, net +734. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 61,464–62,423 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 16:38
62,312
+64
15 Sept 2026, 15:58
62,248
+78
13 Sept 2026, 21:42
62,170
+25
12 Sept 2026, 02:22
62,145
+51
9 Sept 2026, 20:19
62,094
+69
6 Sept 2026, 11:20
62,025
+22
4 Sept 2026, 04:36
62,003
+21
2 Sept 2026, 18:43
61,982
-29
1 Sept 2026, 16:23
62,011
-24
31 Aug 2026, 16:13
62,035
-17
30 Aug 2026, 15:08
62,052
-15
29 Aug 2026, 11:53
62,067
+1
28 Aug 2026, 14:27
62,066
+23
27 Aug 2026, 14:24
62,043
+10
26 Aug 2026, 11:54
62,033
-13
25 Aug 2026, 09:34
62,046
-42
24 Aug 2026, 10:24
62,088
-31
22 Aug 2026, 19:27
62,119
-8
21 Aug 2026, 08:13
62,127
+28
20 Aug 2026, 10:32
62,099
first reading
Engagement
175 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 102 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.15%
avg views ÷ 62,312 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,450
99 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.57%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
99
of 175 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026
Posts held
175 (2 August 2026 – 24 September 2026)
Views total
440,802
Reactions total
33,387
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
24 Sept 2026, 15:12 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈5,830
Videos
≈709
Links
≈4,090
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
28m 13s
Average length
1m 00s
Measured directly from 28 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
61,032 reactions across 175 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
39,382
64.5%
🙏
8,561
14.0%
custom 5449380056201697322
3,116
5.11%
👍
2,635
4.32%
🔥
2,023
3.31%
❤🔥
1,917
3.14%
💯
884
1.45%
🕊
774
1.27%
🎉
447
0.732%
🥰
361
0.591%
👏
209
0.342%
😍
128
0.21%
⚡
100
0.164%
😁
77
0.126%
💘
50
0.082%
✍
48
0.079%
🤝
48
0.079%
👌
40
0.066%
😭
35
0.057%
🤔
34
0.056%
12 further kinds
163
0.267%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 175 of the 175 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 61,032 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 175 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
651
across the posts below
Posts paid on
45
of 175 we hold a reading for · 26%
Most on one post
502
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @S_N_Lazarev. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 175 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 24 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Роды — это унижение гордыни
Почему попытка всё контролировать вредит вам и вашему ребёнку?
💬 «Когда я представляю себе, что рожаю, возникает раздражение. Я понимаю, что роды — это унижение гордыни, но не могу с этим справиться.
— Вы знаете, что такое дьяволизм? — задаю я вопрос. — Это когда вы хотите свою волю сделать стопроцентной, игнорируя при этом волю Творца. Тогда происходит отказ от любви и начинается вырож…
Возможно ли реализовать свое предназначение без потерь?
8 цитат из новой книги «Парадокс успеха»
Перед каждым новым шагом, любимым делом или масштабным проектом мы проходим испытания. И если относиться к ним с внутренним спокойствием и любовью, любые «чистки» превращаются в топливо для успеха.
📖 Книга «Парадокс успеха» — это глубокий взгляд на то, как строить бизнес, карьеру и жизнь без выгорания, страхов и потерь…
Искусство жизни заключается в диалектике: нужно иметь главную цель, стремиться к ней, и нужно уметь ставить перед собой маленькие цели, достигая их и получая удовольствие.
С.Н.Лазарев | Канал в Max
Запускаем конкурс «Ваш путь к прощению родителей»
✓ Автору лучшей истории о прощении родителей дарим бесплатный вход на новую практику «Прощение родителей»
Дорогие читатели! Тема отношений с родителями — одна из самых глубоких и, пожалуй, самых болезненных в жизни каждого человека.
Мы знаем, как это непросто. Это не просто воспоминания. Это то, что вы чувствуете всем сердцем и то, что не можете забыть до сих пор. …
✍️ Продолжите фразу: «Родители думают, что счастье для ребенка — в этом...»
Давайте попробуем ответить на следующие вопросы:
• «Счастье в представлении моих родителей — это ...»
• «Счастье в моем представлении — это ...»
Если вы родитель: позволяете ли вы детям быть счастливыми не так, как вы это представляете, а так, как считают это они?
Ждем ваши наблюдения в комментариях ↓
Если в душе неблагополучие, то, как бы прекрасно человек ни выглядел внешне, как бы разумно и логично ни рассуждал, толку не будет.
Душевная гармония складывается из правильного отношения к жизни, соблюдения заповедей, веры и любви в душе.
Что вас беспокоит прямо сейчас?
И почему признаться в этом нам страшно даже самим себе
Дорогие читатели На сайте программы «Принятие и улучшение судьбы» разместили 6 карточек — 6 ситуаций, которые вас волнуют.
1. Выберите ту фразу, что отзывается, и нажмите на нее:
2. Осознайте за ситуацией глубинную потребность вашей души.
3. Узнайте, как её проработать.
ПОЛУЧИТЬ ПОДСКАЗКИ
по своей ситуации
📣 На сайте также пр…
Мама и папа: именно их одобрения мы ищем всю жизнь...
Если мы недополучаем любви родителей, даже будучи взрослыми людьми, мы неосознанно ищем одобрения, любви и признания в глазах других — руководителей, клиентов, супругов и детей
Ждем, когда нас похвалят, заметят, полюбят. Кажется, еще чуть-чуть — и мы заслужим право на любовь и почувствуем свою ценность.
Почему этого не происходит? Когда внутри есть обиды, раздр…
Что бы они не сделали: почему родители не подлежат осуждению?
Осуждение родителей — это первый шаг отречения от Бога, потому что через родителей мы появляемся на свет. Если человек отрекается от родителей, его молитва работать не будет.
💎 Каким бы жестоким внешне не выглядело поведение родителей, оно всегда работает на спасение души ребенка.
Если у вас были проблемы с родителями, значит, наверное, было мало шансов…
Что такое обида, недовольство, возмущение? Это, на самом деле, примитивная попытка управлять ситуацией. Слабый человек обижается, сильный — действует.
С.Н.Лазарев | Канал в Max
Showing the 12 most recent of 175 posts we hold for @S_N_Lazarev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@S_N_Lazarev edited 12 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
18 September 2026
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Голосуем за лучшую обложку паспорта, которая будет представлены на Дне рождении С.Н.Лазарева 5-6 сентября
134%
222%
321%
429%
59%
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 175 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 24 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Знакомство с исследованиями С.Н. Лазарева @Lazarev_start · 7,581#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Валерий Синельников. Школа Здоровья и Радости @SinelnikovChanel · 30,208 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 7 September 2026
🌏Матрицы Гаряева @matritsagar · 25,920 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 13 September 2026
Садхгуру @SadhguruRussia · 30,570 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 7 September 2026
ИМРАМ КРИЙЯ @imram_kriya · 71,668 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 August 2026
Дмитрий Троцкий и команда @alhimik108 · 39,675 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Лазарев Сергей Николаевич” (@S_N_Lazarev), 62,312 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/S_N_Lazarev.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
