Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
41 measurements spanning 72 days, net +717. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 44,447–46,292 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 41
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Oct 2026, 09:16
45,446
-10
17 Oct 2026, 06:26
45,456
-37
16 Oct 2026, 03:06
45,493
-29
15 Oct 2026, 06:37
45,522
-21
14 Oct 2026, 03:37
45,543
-7
11 Oct 2026, 21:02
45,550
-95
7 Oct 2026, 09:56
45,645
-75
2 Oct 2026, 13:19
45,720
-174
18 Sept 2026, 12:38
45,894
-19
16 Sept 2026, 04:56
45,913
-26
14 Sept 2026, 14:41
45,939
-34
13 Sept 2026, 00:17
45,973
-53
11 Sept 2026, 00:59
46,026
-29
8 Sept 2026, 01:42
46,055
-24
4 Sept 2026, 22:21
46,079
+109
3 Sept 2026, 06:14
45,970
-4
2 Sept 2026, 03:03
45,974
-13
1 Sept 2026, 03:08
45,987
-13
31 Aug 2026, 04:37
46,000
-13
30 Aug 2026, 05:07
46,013
first reading
Engagement
457 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 145 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.50%
avg views ÷ 45,446 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,500
129 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.50%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
136
of 457 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 122 of 129 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 October 2026
Posts held
457 (4 August 2026 – 17 October 2026)
Views total
322,290
Reactions total
4,606
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
17 Oct 2026, 23:49 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4h 09m
Average length
3m 17s
Measured directly from 76 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
18,816 reactions across 412 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
12,379
65.8%
🔥
2,812
14.9%
👍
1,626
8.64%
🙏
553
2.94%
💯
360
1.91%
😁
214
1.14%
👏
193
1.03%
🎉
161
0.856%
custom 5352887298000173587
141
0.749%
👌
103
0.547%
🥰
58
0.308%
😱
51
0.271%
🤩
45
0.239%
🦄
32
0.17%
🤔
26
0.138%
😍
20
0.106%
🤗
18
0.096%
🕊
9
0.048%
😐
9
0.048%
🆒
3
0.016%
2 further kinds
3
0.016%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 417 of the 457 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18,816 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 457 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 17 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
36
across the posts below
Posts paid on
30
of 442 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @omline. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 457 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 17 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
ДЕЛЮСЬ СЕКРЕТНОЙ ПРАКТИКОЙ НА ИСПОЛНЕНИЕ ЖЕЛАНИЙ 🤫🔥
У каждого из нас есть желания, которые годами никак не исполняются. Вроде очень хочется, постоянно об этом думаешь, что-то предпринимаешь, но результата нет🫠.
А теперь давайте посмотрим, что происходит у нас внутри, когда мы думаем об этом желании:
👉У кого-то появляется обида, что другим всё достаётся легко, а ему нет.
👉Кто-то злится, завидует, чувствует вину ил…
👉Почему мы вообще отходим от своей изначальной психоэнергетической структуры?
👉Что происходит, когда начинаем к ней возвращаться? 🤔
В аудио объясняю, почему мы так часто ищем опору во внешних обстоятельствах и как это влияет на нашу жизнь.
Вчера на эфире я подробно разбирала эту тему и показывала всё на живых примерах участников.
Кто пропустил — запись уже ждёт вас в закрытом канале!
СМОТРЕТЬ ЗАПИСЬ ЭФИРА 👇
http…
Осень 2026 года. Начинается период серьёзных перемен…
И я не просто так постоянно говорю, что нам с вами пора срочно приводить себя в порядок‼️
У каждого человека есть своя базовая энергетическая структура. И те качества, которые могли бы давать вам огромные возможности, могут, наоборот, создавать проблемы, если проявляются с негативной стороны.
Сейчас особенно важно разобраться в себе, понять свои возможности и н…
Кто уже проходил тест на определение психотипа? Выкладывала его сюда на днях.
Пишите в комментариях, какой тип у вас получился. Очень интересно посмотреть, какие энергетические структуры у нас здесь преобладают!
А кто ещё не прошёл — проходите прямо сейчас и тоже делитесь результатом в комментариях 👇
«А ВДРУГ У МЕНЯ ОТБЕРУТ ДОМ?» 😳
Споры из-за наследства, конфликты между родственниками, страх потерять имущество, в которое вложено столько сил и денег…
Но что, если реальной угрозы пока нет, а человек уже живёт так, будто самое страшное обязательно произойдёт?
Как мы сами втягиваем себя в чужие проблемы и начинаем бояться того, чего ещё не случилось?
🔥 Прямо сейчас разбираем эту ситуацию на эфире в закрытом кана…
А у нас уже начались живые разборы! 🔥
Прямо сейчас Надежда разбирает качества участников и объясняет, как энергия влияния проявляется в отношениях с другими людьми.
Эфир продолжается в закрытом канале.
ПРИСОЕДИНИТЬСЯ К ЭФИРУ 👇
https://t.me/omline_diagnostika_bot/kanal?utm_source=tg
Прямо сейчас на эфире разбираем, что такое наша Точка А! 🔥
Надежда объясняет, как связаны физическое, эмоциональное и ментальное тела и почему, согласно методу, изменения нужно начинать с внутреннего состояния человека.
Эфир уже идёт в закрытом канале
ПРИСОЕДИНИТЬСЯ К ЭФИРУ 👇
https://t.me/omline_diagnostika_bot/kanal?utm_source=tg
Надежда уже в эфире!
Присоединяйтесь👇
https://t.me/omline_diagnostika_bot/kanal?utm_source=tg
❤9
Showing the 12 most recent of 457 posts we hold for @omline. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@omline edited 10 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
13 August 2026
Most recent edit
16 October 2026
Polls
The 6 most recent of 23 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Как вы обычно поступаете, когда дел становится слишком много?
Мне проще всё сделать самой, чем просить48%
Прошу о помощи, но потом всё контролирую28%
Умею делегировать, но иногда чувствую свою вину9%
Спокойно доверяю дела другим22%
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
А вы как считаете: карма — это уже прописанный сценарий или её всё-таки можно изменить?
Всё предопределено — что должно случиться, то случится7%
Есть точки выбора, где можно изменить сценарий68%
Свою судьбу можно полностью переписать16%
Не знаю, хочу услышать ответ от вас13%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Когда вы думаете о будущем, чего боитесь больше всего?
Остаться без денег /привычного дохода26%
Потерять близкого человека или отношения14%
Остаться одной/одному и без поддержки12%
Не реализоваться и упустить время24%
Потерять здоровье и силы36%
Что привычная жизнь просто перестанет работать6%
Я будущего почти не боюсь19%
The shares total 137%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Если через год вам придётся отказаться от части привычной жизни — работы, окружения, места, роли — сможете отпустить?
Да, если понимаю, что пора87%
Буду держаться до последнего5%
Меня пугает даже сама мысль5%
Не знаю, кто я вообще без привычной жизни3%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 457 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 17 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 27 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Новые люди @NewpeopleMakro · 18,792 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 5 October 2026
Дарья Миронова @dariamironova_official · 23,454 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 17 September 2026
Тайное Сообщество @secrsociety · 30,406 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 7 September 2026
Светлана Драган @svetlanadragan · 113,993 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 August 2026
Sasha Vidit @f_sasha_vidit · 20,828 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 25 September 2026
ПОРА ПРОСНУТЬСЯ | Прогрессивная макро психология @vselenamaster_ps · 74,005 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 August 2026
Лига Свободных Душ @novostizhizn · 24,426 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 September 2026
Екатерина Прохорцева| психология роста сознания @kate_proh · 37,146 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 1 September 2026
Полина Сухова. Переход в 5 D Измерение. @Transitiontothe5D · 38,150 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 28 August 2026
Елена Фаист @elenafaist · 19,767 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 29 September 2026
BRAIN PROGRAMMING @lanaedelshtein · 47,792 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 26 August 2026
Мара Боронина | IZI ПРОСТРАНСТВО 22 УРОВНЯ @svflamen · 41,658 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 29 August 2026
Владимир Туров | Бизнес и рост @turov · 49,043 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
Лазарев Сергей Николаевич @S_N_Lazarev · 62,946 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 22 August 2026
Переход в ТАК. ДОМ @prostovtak · 25,321 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 September 2026
Таро Юлия Петрова Official @taroyuliapetrova · 29,248 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 9 September 2026
Переход в ТАК. Мудрость @perexodvtak · 97,040 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 August 2026
Никита Метелица @nikitametelitsa · 19,762 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 30 September 2026
Angela Pearl Astrology Tarot @angelapearl_astrology · 53,020 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 27 August 2026
ИМРАМ КРИЙЯ @imram_kriya · 71,484 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 August 2026
Антон Мажирин - духовный терапевт @AntonPrednaznachenie · 39,123 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 30 August 2026
NEOHOROSCOPE @neohoroscope · 28,161 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 September 2026
Мастерская Сергея Финько @sverhcheloveksf · 28,746 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 September 2026
Астролог Дмитрий Питченко @astrolog_dmitry_pitchenko · 35,561 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 34 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“OMLINE” (@omline), 45,446 subscribers as measured 18 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/omline.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.