Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 📈💰Павлова Наташа | Про сетевой маркетинг, продажи и рекрутинг

Channel

📈💰Павлова Наташа | Про сетевой маркетинг, продажи и рекрутинг

@Well_Kom

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,898subscribers

-132 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001136826557
TypeChannel
Username@Well_Kom
CreatedBetween 1 June 2017 and 30 September 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Well_Kom

Growth

9,89810,0309,9647 August 2026 — 10,030 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,027 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,023 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,018 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,013 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,005 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,995 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,968 subscribers19 August 2026 — 9,957 subscribers22 August 2026 — 9,945 subscribers25 August 2026 — 9,930 subscribers28 August 2026 — 9,921 subscribers31 August 2026 — 9,911 subscribers4 September 2026 — 9,898 subscribers7 August 20264 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 28 days, net -132. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,878–10,050 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 11:009,898-13
31 Aug 2026, 18:569,911-10
28 Aug 2026, 14:179,921-9
25 Aug 2026, 16:489,930-15
22 Aug 2026, 18:179,945-12
19 Aug 2026, 02:579,957-11
16 Aug 2026, 01:469,968-27
12 Aug 2026, 16:249,995-10
11 Aug 2026, 19:0210,005-8
10 Aug 2026, 16:5610,013-5
9 Aug 2026, 17:4210,018-5
8 Aug 2026, 17:4110,023-4
7 Aug 2026, 18:1010,027-3
7 Aug 2026, 08:4510,030first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.54%
avg views ÷ 9,898 subscribers
Avg views / post
548
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.41%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held24 (24 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total5,483
Reactions total187
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 04:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
27m 34s
Average length
6m 54s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

484 reactions across 23 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥17135.3%
15632.2%
👍7315.1%
💯316.40%
❤‍🔥214.34%
👏153.10%
🥰81.65%
🙏61.24%
👌20.413%
🤗10.207%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 484 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 24 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Well_Kom. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 24 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 10:25 UTC199 views10 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Одна из самых больших ошибок в сетевом бизнесе — искать человека, который уже умеет продавать, вести сторис, выступать и легко знакомиться. Кажется: «Вот он! Активный — значит, перспективный». Но на практике опыт ≠ потенциал. Иногда самый сильный партнёр — это человек, который сегодня вообще ничего не умеет, зато обладает качествами, которые невозможно быстро «натренировать». Я смотрю прежде всего на это ⬇️ 1.

🔥7👍21

27 Aug 2026, 07:11 UTC321 views17 reactionsread 29 August 2026

#МысльДня Главная причина , почему у 90% новичков в сетевом так ничего и не получается - это неспособность выдерживать отсутствие быстрых результатов. ➡️ @Well_Kom

💯12👍3👏2

26 Aug 2026, 18:53 UTC399 views22 reactionsread 29 August 2026

#МысльДня Не ищите «готовых» партнеров в свою команду, но ищите настоящих. Не ищите тех, кто уже всё умеет. Ищите тех, кто готов учиться, работать и расти. Навыки можно передать. Опыт можно получить. Знания можно приобрести. А вот характер, ответственность и внутренний стержень — не выдашь человеку вместе с обучением. Поэтому, когда в следующий раз будете искать партнёра, спросите себя не: «Насколько он активный

12👍6🔥3👏1

25 Aug 2026, 13:53 UTC445 views21 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

😎 Самое странное возражение, которое я когда-либо слышала: «Это развод!» И знаете, что самое интересное? Человек говорит это не после покупки продукта и даже не после презентации маркетинг-плана. Он говорит это… до того, как я вообще успеваю объяснить, чем именно занимаюсь и что предлагаю. Сначала я растерялась. А потом поняла: это вообще не про мой бизнес. Когда человек говорит «это развод» или «слишком хорош

👍135🔥3

25 Aug 2026, 10:33 UTC387 views15 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @pavlova_obzorPhoto

#ИзЛичного 🤗 Для меня отдых у моря — это давно не просто отдых и не просто «полежать» Для меня это: Перезагрузка. Источник ресурса. Пространство, в котором мысли становятся тише, а идеи — яснее. Я заметила одну удивительную вещь: уезжая к морю, хотя бы всего на 5 дней, как в этот раз, я не только лучше отдыхаю — я лучше работаю. Диалоги идут легче. Решения приходят быстрее. Новые идеи возникают будто сами собой.

11👍4

16 Aug 2026, 20:07 UTC819 views20 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

«Я ХОЧУ В КОМАНДУ СИЛЬНЫХ ПАРТНЕРОВ, КОТОРЫХ НЕ НУЖНО МОТИВИРОВАТЬ И ОБУЧАТЬ» Да! Конечно, это очень понятное желание. Но если ты строишь сетевой бизнес именно с такой установкой, стоит задать себе один неудобный вопрос: А откуда вообще возьмутся эти сильные партнеры? Давай разберемся 🤗 1. Сильный партнер не всегда приходит сильным. Человек может быть амбициозным, умным и очень перспективным, но ничего не понимать

🔥137

14 Aug 2026, 11:04 UTC740 views30 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

☑️ Чем сетевик отличается от обычного продавца? Знаете, какую ошибку я чаще всего вижу у новичков? Они приходят в сетевой бизнес и думают, что теперь им нужно научиться продавать. Научиться красиво рассказывать о продукте. Правильно отвечать на возражения. Уметь закрывать человека на покупку. И тогда когда-нибудь можно будет выйти на шести-семизначный доход , как написано в маркетинг-плане Но со временем понимаешь

🔥107👍5👏4💯4

13 Aug 2026, 10:15 UTC691 views30 reactionsread 29 August 2026

#МысльДня Главный продукт сетевого бизнеса — не только тот, который лежит в коробке. Главный продукт — это тот человек, которым ты становишься в процессе. - Потому что построить команду невозможно, если ты сам не растёшь. - Нельзя научить уверенности, постоянно сомневаясь в себе. - Нельзя научить дисциплине, если сам работаешь только тогда, когда есть настроение. 💬 @Well_Kom

🔥12👍117

12 Aug 2026, 15:44 UTC727 views10 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

☑️ Что такое Личный Товарооборот в сетевом? И зачем он нужен? @Well_Kom

🔥72💯1

11 Aug 2026, 16:11 UTC755 views12 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

💙 Запись эфира в ВКонтакте

❤‍🔥6🔥4👏2

8 Aug 2026, 06:29 UTC808 viewsread 26 August 2026

С нетерпением ждем следующего LeaderBoost Siberian Wellness ❤️‍🔥

8 Aug 2026, 06:29 UTC887 views21 reactions1 Starread 27 August 2026
Forwarded from @siberianwellnessnewsVideo

ТОП-Лидер Наталья Павлова о LeaderBoost 🌟 Чтобы расти в бизнесе, важно менять мышление. На LeaderBoost Diamond Business Leader Наталья Павлова поделилась личными фишками, которые когда-то помогли ей сфокусироваться и привели к результату. А еще рассказала, почему сегодня важно быть в синергии офлайн- и онлайн-технологий.💫 Смотрите видео ~ и вы узнаете, какие идеи рождаются в закрытом кругу ТОП-Лидеров и как одна и

🔥144❤‍🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @Well_Kom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Татьяна Другова.Полезности в моменте
@tatyanadrugova · 42,156
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 August 2026
Наталья Грэйс
@nataliagrace · 33,357
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 4 September 2026
Для женщин про здоровье
@volkovaforwomen · 280,042
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 10 August 2026
Санаторий Волковой. Осенняя смена
@evolkova_for_women · 83,817
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 August 2026
Барсукова Елена, интегративный врач-терапевт👩🏻‍⚕️
@drbarsukova · 29,061
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 9 September 2026
Девочки, про кремики хотите?
@devochkamprokremiki · 29,838
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 8 September 2026
Siberian Wellness. PRO БАД
@rusiberianwellness · 81,963
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 19 August 2026
Оазис Здоровья
@pr_dadali · 87,525
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 17 August 2026
⚕️ Дмитрий Семирядов️️ / Превентивный врач, нутрициолог / dsemiryadov
@dsemiryadov_official · 76,547
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
Катя Гуру
@Katya_guru · 46,461
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 27 August 2026
Гастроэнтеролог Ольга Помойнецкая
@olga_pomoynetskaya · 253,327
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 August 2026
Ксения Машкина
@dr_mashkina · 75,453
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 August 2026
Про здоровье | Наталья Кондакова врач функциональной медицины
@nataliakondakova_naturopat · 68,892
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 August 2026
Дадали В.А. Школа здоровья
@putkzdoroviyu · 31,472
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 6 September 2026

This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“📈💰Павлова Наташа | Про сетевой маркетинг, продажи и рекрутинг” (@Well_Kom), 9,898 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Well_Kom.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.