MEME pinned «fomo :https://fomo.family/profile/yeonwoo1102 레퍼럴은 셀퍼럴하시고 본인돈들아끼십쇼 건승»

Channel
yndegen
@Yndegen
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
7subscribers
-10,391 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002405573737 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Yndegen |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 23 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Yndegen |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Previous handles
@Yndegen was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
held 6 August 2026 – 6 August 2026
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:57 | 7 | -10,778 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 10,785 | +25 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:17 | 10,760 | +24 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 01:27 | 10,736 | +74 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:07 | 10,662 | +9 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:34 | 10,653 | +46 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:55 | 10,607 | +12 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:26 | 10,595 | +16 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 05:34 | 10,579 | -8 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 05:35 | 10,587 | +27 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 08:22 | 10,560 | -2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 11:02 | 10,562 | +1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:05 | 10,561 | +3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 02:06 | 10,558 | +11 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:04 | 10,547 | +36 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:47 | 10,511 | +4 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:32 | 10,507 | +2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:25 | 10,505 | +16 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:52 | 10,489 | +2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:40 | 10,487 | first reading |
Engagement
141 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 55972.9%
- avg views ÷ 7 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,920
- 58 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.841%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 59
- of 141 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 55 of 58 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 141 (3 August 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 227,250 |
| Reactions total | 1,822 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 00:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 45s
- Average length
- 45s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,481 reactions across 119 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5424885441100782420 | 4,481 | 100.0% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 131 of the 141 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,864 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 141 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
believe in yourself
custom 542488544110078242032
Signed eon y
👀
custom 542488544110078242024
Signed eon y
아직 Pons에서 제대로 성공한 V2 RWA + Meme 사례를 보지 못했는데 만약 정말 자체 토큰만 성장시키는 것이 목적이 아니라면, RWA + Meme 섹터에서 시장의 주목을 끌 만한 큰 무언가가 나와줘야 한다고 생각하고있음. 그게 어떤게될지는모르겠지만 적어도 둘다 들고있으니 아무나 해줘
custom 542488544110078242022
Signed eon y
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 542488544110078242010
Signed eon y
gmgn 관련텍스문제 과거에 물어봤던거 올려드려요
custom 542488544110078242022
Signed eon y
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed eon y
Base를 믿거나 신뢰하는 편은 아니지만, 이번 건은 좀 다른 케이스처럼 느껴짐. 평소라면 Base 쪽에서 직접 어떤 걸 밀어서 러너로 만드는 그림이었을 텐데, 이번에는 웹2에서 유명한 여성 크리에이터가 바세린을 Baseline이라고 부른 게 시작이었고, 그걸 현재 Base 쪽에서 영향력이 굉장히 큰 Cobie가 직접 올리면서 Jesse까지 태그했음. 이모든상황이 엄청 불리쉬해보이고 바세린으로 인해 2차 창작물은 너무쉽게만들수있을것같음
custom 542488544110078242045
Signed eon y
https://x.com/i/status/2093287038183223340
custom 542488544110078242018
Signed eon y
저 AI 모델에 사람들이 관심을 가지게 된 이유는 단순한편인데 바이낸스는 최근 며칠 동안 지속적으로 Binance Agent OS와 AI Agent 관련 내용을 홍보해왔고, 허이 역시 관련 게시물들을 여러 차례 직접 공유했습니다. 실제로 바이낸스는 Your AI Agent, Give your AI Agent an edge Connect your AI agents to the future of finance 같은 메시지를 계속해서 사용하며 AI Agent와 Binance Agent OS를 적극적으로 밀고 있었고 그리고 허이 역시 Your rules. Your agents. Your Finance. Your Binance. 라는 문구와 함께 Agent OS를 직접 소개하고, Binance의 AI Agent 관련 게시물들을 반복적으로 공유했던상…
custom 542488544110078242026
Signed eon y
중국인들이 하도 뭐라 해서 바이낸스 측에 진짜 인물인지 직접 물어봤는데, 바이낸스 VIP 측 답변은 실존 인물이라고 답변했습니다. 그런데 또 AI 가상 모델을 만들어놨네요. 제가 우려했던 게 딱 이런 부분입니다. 바이낸스는 항상 우리가 생각하는 것 이상으로 행동할 때가 많아요. 그래서 계속 의문을 제기했던 건데... 멀쩡한 1.2%만 소각했네 ^^;;
custom 542488544110078242037
Signed eon y
keep going
custom 542488544110078242023
Signed eon y
Showing the 12 most recent of 141 posts we hold for @Yndegen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
현재 BSC + HOOD에서 수익 중이신가요, 손실 중이신가요?
- 손실49%
- 수익30%
- 참여안함21%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 141 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@cryptocurrencymage · 9,4627 posts싸이버트럭
@cybertruck666 · 10,4596 posts꿀찾는 양말이 Super N 크립토 일기장 ⚡️
@Honeyofwhitesocks_2 · 10,6352 posts한몸이된다
@bconebody · 792 postsvictory
@chit_korea · 6,4072 posts오리 이노치 리써치 (스폰서환영)
@enochmemos · 2,8992 posts꿀통연구소 Honeylab Airdrop · Perps · AI
@honeylab1 · 6232 posts인후는 외롭지 않아요.
@inhu0 · 5,7682 posts암호화폐 연구소
@ishowcrypto7 · 662 postsManbull (구, AI 버블이 온다) 공지방
@justicekingsman · 15,9402 posts눈치왕 HOYA
@metakingHoya · 312 posts사카밤바스피스 낙서장
@otakurypto · 5782 posts짜빠구리
@zza892892 · 14,6422 postsBMT 파라다이스
@BMTube · 13,3201 post나? 대장균
@EcoliResearch · 7231 post쉬었음청년 집가고싶다
@Iwanttogohome09 · 5,4581 post진토리
@Jinstori · 1,2121 post캇즈의 크립토 노트📝☕️
@Katzenote · 6,6361 post안호구의 호구 탈출기
@ahhhhhooooo · 4581 post덴티의 사부작에드작 기록(쥔장 렙업중)
@beendentii · 4091 postBokjisa_idea_share
@bokjisaideashare · 3,9381 post코인맵핵 🎈
@centurywhale · 16,4741 post국장이 되고싶은 CCT
@civilescape · 451 post코블린의 IBC 훈련대대
@cobling · 6,3551 postCRYPTO Sea
@crypt0_sea · 15,8501 post크립토파즈(Cryptopaz)
@cryptopaz0 · 11,2431 post불굴의 의지로🔥
@effort_never_betrays_U · 2,1591 post쫑이밥그릇팔아알트사기
@jjonge1219 · 1,9931 post코리의 코인리서치
@korii_research · 6871 post이도진 메타버스 공지사항 🦅
@leedogin2 · 15,0301 post레오마스터‘s 코인 공지채널
@leomasternotice · 5691 post기분좋은 마곤
@magonia_b · 26,9341 postMid-curve Research
@mid_curve · 7821 post내 부인 아르카나
@mywifeArcana · 1,5941 post쿠즈코 멘징방
@nananaa_kuzco · 1,6461 post필립 x 춘삼의 온몸 비틀기
@philip_chunsam_notice · 3611 post부의길목에서 🦅
@stay_news · 7,8251 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“yndegen” (@Yndegen), 7 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Yndegen.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.