Прoстo oтправь боту фoтoграфию любoй девyшки и oн сдeлаeт oфигeннoе видео с ней! Ccылкa: 👩❤️💋👩👉 https://t.me/photo1razd Вoплoти в реальнoсть любую свoю фaнтазию!

Channel
Шаблоны Cap Cut | Кап Кут
@capcutemplates1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
123,424subscribers
-4,554 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001842652825 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @capcutemplates1 |
| Description | Самые трендовые шаблоны CapCut! Совет: включайте уведомления, чтобы не пропускать новинки💘 Большинство шаблонов работает без VPN РЕКЛАМА: @Kustik16 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/capcutemplates1 |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 37% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 19:36 | 123,424 | -307 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 14:56 | 123,731 | -370 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 13:19 | 124,101 | -281 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 06:34 | 124,382 | -82 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:08 | 124,464 | -98 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:15 | 124,562 | -94 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 124,656 | -222 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 124,878 | -166 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:55 | 125,044 | -180 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:43 | 125,224 | -169 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:05 | 125,393 | -112 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:53 | 125,505 | -137 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 08:05 | 125,642 | -300 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:38 | 125,942 | -79 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 07:06 | 126,021 | -166 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 06:35 | 126,187 | -160 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 05:38 | 126,347 | -142 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 08:22 | 126,489 | -150 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:27 | 126,639 | -176 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:06 | 126,815 | first reading |
Engagement
324 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 106 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.50%
- avg views ÷ 123,424 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,860
- 279 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.088%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 279
- of 324 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 82 of 279 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 324 (5 August 2026 – 9 September 2026) |
| Views total | 518,095 |
| Reactions total | 138 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Sept 2026, 18:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈273
- Videos
- ≈5,550
- Links
- ≈5,070
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1h 05m
- Average length
- 14s
Measured directly from 275 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
168 reactions across 75 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 78 | 46.4% | |
| 💘 | 46 | 27.4% | |
| 👍 | 22 | 13.1% | |
| 😍 | 11 | 6.55% | |
| 🤩 | 6 | 3.57% | |
| 🏆 | 5 | 2.98% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 94 of the 324 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 168 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 324 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 9 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
💘💘💘💘💘💘 Sugar On My Tongue ⬇️ Использовать шаблон
💂♀️💂♀️💂♀️💂♀️💂♀️ 😢 Игрок сорвал куш с множителем x1000 и поднял огромный баланс на LuckyBear! Здесь самые большие выигрыши, ведь каждый новый игрок получает БОНУС 👉 🪙 200 000₽ + 250 FS 🪙 Вводи промокод ⭐️ LKK820 ⭐️ и забирай бонус прямо сейчас: ➡️ https://gamejack777.xyz/7Nmzer ➡️ https://gamejack777.xyz/7Nmzer 🔼 Шанс на выигрыш от 97% ☄️ 🐼 Один бренд — одна платформа — LuckyBear 🐾 ☄️ ✈️ Телеграм: @luckybear…
💘💘💘💘💘💘 COMING SOON🔜 ⬇️ Использовать шаблон
Бесплатный впн 🙏 👉ВПН 👈 Берите кому надо 🤗
💘💘💘💘💘💘 Fyp ⬇️ Использовать шаблон
🔴В 2025 году Россияне заработали 5,3 млрд рублей на арбитраже криптовалют По данным Минфин 32% граждан покинули своё место работы, поскольку в среднем уже в первый месяц тут можно зарабатывать от 140 000 рублей, а через 2-3 месяца с легкостью выйти на семизначные числа. Самое смешное, что лишь 8% россиян что-то слышали об этой профессии, хотя все инструкции бесплатно лежат на канале «Арбитраж Криптовалют» Там объя…
💘💘💘💘💘💘 Recharge my energy ⬇️ Использовать шаблон
💘💘💘💘💘💘 OOTD ⬇️ Использовать шаблон
🫐Владелица WILDBERRIES Татьяна Ким, объявила о тестировании новой акции связанной с заработком, теперь вы можете зарабатывать от нескольких тысяч рублей в день, уделяя буквально 30 минут свободного времени участвуя в программе по продвижению продавцов, требуется только телефон, никаких обучений, во всем помогают кураторы. Тестирование будет длится 30 дней, принять участие можно вступив в чат👇🏻
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥2
💘💘💘💘💘💘 Life in September ✨ ⬇️ Использовать шаблон
Showing the 12 most recent of 324 posts we hold for @capcutemplates1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@capcutemplates1 edited 10 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 7 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 9 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@Luckybear_rn · 1709 postsSkip VPN 🐬 Быстрый интернет
@SkippNetBot · 133,3656 postsTonPlay
@tonplay · 673,4475 postsJetTon Official
@jetton · 6654 postsLuna AI (18+)
@luna_playbot · 644,5272 postsGreen VPN 🌿
@greenvpn_rbot · 85,3521 postLumix VPN
@Lumix_vpn_bot · 66,9231 postНорм VPN | Happ | v2RayTun
@normwpn_bot · 76,8891 poststudy point place
@studypointtttplace · 5351 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@capcutemplates1 named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 26 August 2026 – 26 August 2026 · confirmed gone 27 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 5 posts, 8 August 2026 – 6 September 2026
named in 3 posts, 2 September 2026 – 6 September 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@futazhii · 105,753#1
@zaborpinkreels · 15,587#2
@capcut_asst · 34,200#3
@maslennikovliga · 2,155,300#4
@arinareels · 2,401#5
@capcuttemplate2024 · 15,520#6
@exilemusic13 · 1,423,910#7
@thegerberslive · 652,118#8
@br1anm7ps · 1,086,821#9
@top_capcut · 53,367#10
@capcuutsss · 7,150#11
@templatess_CapCut · 6,070#12
@valentinablor · 133,557#13
@creative_blogging · 36,192#14
@reels_memes · 134,824#15
@leoday · 5,514,505#16
@plsbetenderly · 226,528#17
@test_dot · 521,697#18
@smm_reels1 · 9,742#19
@memy_bez_nadpisei · 20,430#20
@kuulesh · 38,082#21
@bigpencil · 1,202,381#22
@aslanshukasha · 297,102#23
@s_golovoj · 83,715#24
@creativity_ch · 32,276#25
@instasamkacore · 439,500#26
@anettafim · 13,102#27
@pravdadirty · 1,367,110#28
@TgEmojis · 1,668,966#29
@etoznakmag · 638,645#30
@milashkina_nekrasova · 253,452#31
@anyaischukkkk · 601,356#32
@love_thxs · 454,615#33
@egorkreed · 751,253#34
@paradeevich · 1,051,664#35
@ekaterina_mizulina · 929,348#36
@officialannaperesild · 184,278#37
@koreshzy · 830,504#38
@formemas · 195,927#39
@iminlovewleo · 143,645#40
@moscowach · 4,146,469#41
@reelstutor · 51,499#42
@msk_live · 1,806,067#43
@danila_gorilla · 643,468#44
@evodays · 387,009#45
@mskint · 3,297,785#46
@kosti · 565,629#47
@moscowmap · 2,687,588#48
@emoji1 · 1,085,977#49
@egorikvtg · 708,521#50
@stikery4 · 1,078,503#51
@cafe_citaty · 266,362#52
@official_romanceclub · 739,832#53
@avtrusovaofficial · 234,192#54
@budaog · 359,129#55
@okbnews · 190,339#56
@astro_juliaa · 217,298#57
@GOSPOSHA_EVELIN · 103,065#58
@real_ruzil · 159,144#59
@strochki_tg · 55,250#60
@Gavril1nna · 142,287#61
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@futazhii · 105,753
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 27 here — alongside 26 others — read 14 August 2026
@capcut_asst · 34,200
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 3 September 2026
@capcut · 168,204
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 16 August 2026
@top_capcut · 53,367
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 24 August 2026
@membeztexta · 193,228
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
@reels_memes · 134,824
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 13 August 2026
@no_reels_pls · 31,558
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 6 September 2026
@memreels · 84,596
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 18 August 2026
@presety · 309,335
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 August 2026
@presetyu · 42,983
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 28 August 2026
@reelstutor · 51,499
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Шаблоны Cap Cut | Кап Кут” (@capcutemplates1), 123,424 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/capcutemplates1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.