Авторский канал про экономику и финансы. Новости о нейросетях, крипте и NFT.
Второй канал: @deta1echka
Мой YouTube канал: https://youtube.com/@detalka_
По всем вопросам: @msm031
*Информация на канале не является финансовой рекомендацией.
Created
Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
66 measurements spanning 42 days, net -5,464. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 106,490–113,594 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 66
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 23:19
107,310
-24
18 Sept 2026, 11:21
107,334
-166
16 Sept 2026, 17:41
107,500
-49
16 Sept 2026, 07:40
107,549
-261
14 Sept 2026, 19:55
107,810
-20
14 Sept 2026, 13:37
107,830
-152
13 Sept 2026, 05:19
107,982
-10
13 Sept 2026, 02:18
107,992
-295
11 Sept 2026, 05:41
108,287
-8
11 Sept 2026, 04:20
108,295
-368
8 Sept 2026, 09:36
108,663
-4
8 Sept 2026, 09:00
108,667
-575
5 Sept 2026, 05:38
109,242
-13
5 Sept 2026, 00:58
109,255
-289
3 Sept 2026, 09:53
109,544
-7
3 Sept 2026, 08:48
109,551
-154
2 Sept 2026, 02:44
109,705
-1
2 Sept 2026, 02:22
109,706
-136
1 Sept 2026, 05:38
109,842
-56
31 Aug 2026, 23:37
109,898
first reading
Engagement
173 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 95 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.64%
avg views ÷ 107,310 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,980
105 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.913%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
105
of 173 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 September 2026
Posts held
173 (2 August 2026 – 20 September 2026)
Views total
522,960
Reactions total
4,775
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
20 Sept 2026, 21:13 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,110
Videos
≈533
Links
≈3,910
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
5m 43s
Average length
26s
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
7,816 reactions across 172 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,467
31.6%
😁
1,014
13.0%
🔥
807
10.3%
😱
596
7.63%
🤯
416
5.32%
🤔
386
4.94%
👍
382
4.89%
👏
244
3.12%
💘
212
2.71%
🗿
212
2.71%
😢
207
2.65%
😍
134
1.71%
😎
120
1.54%
🤣
100
1.28%
😐
83
1.06%
🤩
80
1.02%
👀
77
0.985%
🤬
76
0.972%
🤨
67
0.857%
🏆
28
0.358%
8 further kinds
108
1.38%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 172 of the 173 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,816 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 173 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 20 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
428
across the posts below
Posts paid on
119
of 172 we hold a reading for · 69%
Most on one post
23
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @deta1ka. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 173 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 20 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
0.578%
1 of 173 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
5,110
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
5,060
over 171 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VSb5z5tjZ4
1
23 August 2026
23 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 173 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 20 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
😢 Бедность в молодости разрушает мозг уже к 50 годам
Учёные 30 лет подряд наблюдали за несколькими тысячами людьми. Вывод: постоянная нехватка денег связана с ухудшением работы мозга к середине жизни.
Эффект оставался даже с учётом детских травм, образования и исходного интеллекта.
Исследователи связывают это с хроническим стрессом из-за счетов и долгов: он постепенно истощает мозг и повышает риск возрастных наруш…
💀 Искусственный интеллект начал придумывать собственный язык
Исследователи заметили: автономные ИИ агенты в экспериментах сами стали создавать новые слова, метафоры и правила общения. Люди их об этом не просили.
В разговорах смешивались технические термины, жаргон и образы. Привычные слова иногда получали уже другой смысл.
Учёные предупреждают: такой язык может затруднить контроль и понимание того, что системы дел…
☠️ Илон Маск: «у вас осталось не больше 10 лет, чтобы зарабатывать деньги, продавая свою работу»
Самый богатый человек на земле считает, что искусственный интеллект скоро возьмёт на себя большую часть работы. А платить человеку за работу, рабочие часы – перестанет иметь смысл.
Модель «отдал время и силы – получил зарплату», по которой мир жил веками, подходит к концу. Маск считает, что этот сдвиг поменяет отношение…
😢 Каждый второй готов простить долг
Исходя из опросов, почти половина людей в России готовы забыть про невозвращённые деньги.
Большинство предпочитают просто напоминать другу про долг. А вот в суд или к коллекторам идут лишь 2%.
Забавно, что чаще всего не отдают небольшие суммы – до 5000 рублей.
Из-за этого почти у 60% людей портятся отношения. И многие уже не готовы снова давать в долг.
А вы даете в долг?
👍 – д…
🤔 Россияне пока не просят деньги просто так от государства...
Идея платить каждому человеку фиксированную сумму без работы – безусловный базовый доход – всё чаще обсуждается в мире. Особенно на фоне роста искуственного интеллекта и роботов.
"Думаю, до нас оно тоже дойдет, и довольно скоро. Но пока этого нет" – глава ВЦИОМ
Хотели бы такое?
👍 – да
🗿 – нет
🫢 Важнее видимость работы, чем результат?
Исследование на тысячи сотрудников показало, что умение выглядеть занятым и удобным для руководителя – нравится больше. Даже если это почти не эффективно с точки зрения самой работы.
Проблема в том что система крупных компаний часто принимает красивую картинку за настоящую пользу.
⚙️ Деталька
Сегодня раздам немного подарков среди активных подписчиков
⚙️ Деталька
❤25🔥21💘7🤯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 173 posts we hold for @deta1ka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@deta1ka edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 September 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 173 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 20 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
⚙️ Деталька о крипте @deta1echka · 26,239 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 12 September 2026
SAID RAGIMOV CRYPTO @saidragimov · 39,823 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 30 August 2026
Владиславский 🌌 @vladiiiiken · 205,763 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 12 September 2026
TON Всезнайка @ton_vseznayka · 172,382 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
2 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“⚙️ Деталька” (@deta1ka), 107,310 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/deta1ka.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
