Apple тайно запретила iPhone предлагать некоторые слова и фразы В коде iOS 27 обнаружили чёрный список выражений, которые клавиатура намеренно игнорирует при автозаполнении. В основном туда попали оскорбления и мат, но есть и политические фразы. Например, «Диктатор Трамп» система не предложит, а «Президент Буш» недавно исключили из списка. При этом вручную написать можно что угодно. Купить звезды Мой ВПН

Channel
SAID RAGIMOV CRYPTO
@saidragimov
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
37,294subscribers
-4,755 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001907059605 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @saidragimov |
| Description | По рекламе: @sragimoov Резервный канал по крипте — @cryptosteron1 Личный канал автора — @saidragimoov |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 31 January 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 62 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/saidragimov |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 13:38 | 37,294 | -59 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 10:58 | 37,353 | -32 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 13:11 | 37,385 | -34 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 12:09 | 37,419 | -54 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 15:20 | 37,473 | -52 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 13:48 | 37,525 | -36 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 12:16 | 37,561 | -57 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 14:28 | 37,618 | -87 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 11:09 | 37,705 | -43 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 14:27 | 37,748 | -60 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 11:08 | 37,808 | -55 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 10:38 | 37,863 | -44 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 10:18 | 37,907 | -31 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 12:54 | 37,938 | -33 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 13:21 | 37,971 | -61 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 16:06 | 38,032 | -44 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 17:06 | 38,076 | -57 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 12:56 | 38,133 | -46 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 11:16 | 38,179 | -67 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 09:15 | 38,246 | first reading |
Engagement
206 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 177 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.433%
- avg views ÷ 37,294 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 161
- 60 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.865%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 60
- of 206 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 60 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 206 (28 July 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 9,680 |
| Reactions total | 20 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 22:56 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,420
- Videos
- ≈236
- Links
- ≈2,130
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 14m 33s
- Average length
- 35s
Measured directly from 25 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
55 reactions across 34 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 44 | 80.0% | |
| 🖕 | 5 | 9.09% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 7.27% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 1.82% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 1.82% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 43 of the 206 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 55 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 206 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 60 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
OpenAI представила GPT-6 Cyber — ИИ-модель для поиска и эксплуатации уязвимостей, которой присвоили наивысший уровень опасности Она способна самостоятельно выявлять бреши даже в системах с усиленной защитой и находить способы их использования. В ходе тестов модель создала рабочие эксплойты для 948 уязвимостей в ядре Linux, а также обнаружила 81 ранее неизвестную критическую уязвимость в Firefox. При этом она выход…
🇺🇸 Элизабет Уоррен, известная своей жёсткой позицией против криптовалют, может занять пост главы банковского комитета Сената США Это предоставит ей дополнительные полномочия для проведения расследований, вызова руководителей компаний на слушания и усиления контроля над финансовым сектором. • В зоне повышенного внимания могут оказаться криптопроекты семьи Трампа, в том числе World Liberty Financial, а также рынки пр…
🇨🇳 Китай усиливает давление на крипторынок и берет под контроль продвижение Solana Народный банк Китая совместно с правоохранительными органами и другими ведомствами пресек проведение мероприятий, посвящённых Solana, в Шанхае. Решение последовало после масштабной рекламной кампании проекта. Власти также планируют провести расследование в отношении компаний и физических лиц, причастных к организации и продвижению ме…
США накрыла волна обвала: фондовый рынок потерял более $1 трлн за первые минуты торгов — Десятки американских компаний подешевели на 10% и более. Крипторынок также просел: мемкоин Дональда Трампа $TRUMP обновил исторический минимум. Среди причин называют результаты выборов в Конгресс, опасения вокруг индустрии ИИ и слабую отчётность технологических компаний. Трамп продал биткоины на $343 млн на фоне угрозы расслед…
Артур Хейс полагает, что падение стоимости акций компаний, работающих в сфере ИИ, может замедлить рост банковского кредитования Это, в свою очередь, приведёт к сокращению долларовой ликвидности и усилит давление на BTC и другие криптовалюты. В то же время он допускает, что системный кризис в индустрии ИИ может вынудить центральные банки перейти к смягчению денежно-кредитной политики. В долгосрочной перспективе тако…
В России участились случаи кражи криптовалюты после посещения порносайтов Пользователи Trust Wallet потеряли около $5,57 млн из-за вредоносной программы DarkSword, использующей уязвимость в iOS 18. По данным специалистов, для заражения устройства может быть достаточно открыть вредоносную страницу через браузер Safari. После этого злоумышленники получают возможность похитить криптовалюту со смартфона. Один из постр…
Strategy сегодня осуществила первую ежедневную выплату дивидендов по привилегированным акциям STRC Ранее выплаты по STRC производились два раза в месяц. Теперь дивиденды начисляются ежедневно, включая выходные и праздничные дни, а фактические выплаты осуществляются в каждый предусмотренный графиком рабочий день. Текущая годовая ставка доходности STRC составляет 12% от номинальной стоимости акции в $100. При этом пе…
OpenAI протестировала секретную ИИ-модель с использованием 10,000 автономных агентов На протяжении почти четырёх суток они непрерывно работали над одной из самых сложных математических задач — проблемой Навье — Стокса. По заявлению компании, системе удалось справиться с поставленной задачей. Пока модель остаётся закрытой и недоступной для широкой публики. При этом OpenAI утверждает, что её возможности значительно…
Ethereum Foundation усиливает работу с государственным сектором Организация представила отдельную платформу, направленную на продвижение Ethereum среди государственных структур, международных организаций и НКО. Основная концепция — использовать Ethereum как универсальную цифровую инфраструктуру, независимую от контроля отдельных государств и частных компаний. На платформе уже опубликованы примеры практического при…
GTA 6 может сэкономить игрокам до $5000 на развлечениях, считает миллионер и финансовый эксперт Марк Тилбери Он предложил рассматривать покупку игры как альтернативу регулярным тратам на досуг. По его расчетам, если играть по четыре часа каждый вечер, то 200 часов прохождения растянутся на 50 дней. За это время на рестораны и развлечения можно было бы потратить $5000 из расчета $100 ежедневно. Таким образом, при у…
Акции компаний, связанных с искусственным интеллектом, за октябрь потеряли $3,46 трлн капитализации Сильнее всего упали бумаги Intel (−43,4%), CoreWeave (−37,7%), Nebius (−36,7%) и SanDisk (−33,4%). Снижение затронуло и крупнейшие технологические компании. Акции Google потеряли 18,7%, AMD — 17,2%, Meta — 15,8%, TSMC — 11%, Nvidia — 10,7%. Бумаги Broadcom снизились на 8,6%, Oracle — на 4,3%. Купить звезды Мой ВПН
Showing the 12 most recent of 206 posts we hold for @saidragimov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@telegacrypton · 98,812#1
@hmstr_kombat_bot · 24,437#2
@deta1ka · 117,868#3
@digitality · 186,081#4
@evgenahata · 95,244#5
@combathamster · 61,000#6
@eeusd · 1,064,223#7
@farmingweb · 26,495#8
@ez_money_stake · 11,369#9
@Crypto_Woolf · 2,006,059#10
@CryptoPayk · 148,660#11
@vestirussia · 909,249#12
@cryptachg · 8,853#13
@hayzonn · 2,571,060#14
@semenchuk · 1,139,578#15
@crypadvis · 90,816#16
@tons_base · 453,091#17
@investor_hamster · 41,847#18
@thecryptoff · 21,980#19
@deta1echka · 24,174#20
@DollarCryptan · 10,674#21
@Palantir_116 · 66,727#22
@crypto_games_boost_money · 7,991#23
@blesscrypt0 · 1,710#24
@Pepe_Drophanter · 48,316#25
@teamspeak00 · 331#26
@taps_to · 1,364#27
@khamsterd · 15,675#28
@blum_171 · 11,295#29
@pushvpn_proxy · 30,026#30
@incrypto_tg · 139,362#31
@rilcrypto · 69,574#32
@onerussia · 1,277,085#33
@cryptoosanya · 75,116#34
@hamster_kombat · 19,644,695#35
@blumcrypto · 12,859,271#36
@notcoin · 7,885,777#37
@saidragimoov · 523#38
@hare_hot_news · 1,321#39
@otbivnaya_iz_krypti · 3,301#40
@Anton_cryptoo · 137,964#41
@palitra97 · 4,603#42
@walt_news_cis · 1,087,288#43
@crypto_jeman · 624,325#44
@tonfo · 131,594#45
@demwinner · 185,646#46
@humsterkkombo · 13,730#47
@hamster_comboref · 14,744#48
@hamster_homyaks · 10,037#49
@keeper_cis · 437,699#50
@lostdogscoru · 209,252#51
@finansist_busines · 594,364#52
@crypto_vestnic · 201,077#53
@Gifts_Traderr · 189,356#54
@CoinUPuz · 36,048#55
@Kripto_Azbuk · 280,017#56
@dogs · 6,451,094#57
@stellartrx · 5,294#58
@uzummarket_global · 16,388#59
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@deta1ka · 117,868
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 15 August 2026
@vladiiiiken · 194,989
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 12 September 2026
@shitock · 396,632
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 14 August 2026
@deta1echka · 24,174
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 12 September 2026
@telegacrypton · 98,812
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SAID RAGIMOV CRYPTO” (@saidragimov), 37,294 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/saidragimov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.