Channel
@hasanabbasi_students
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,665subscribers
+11 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001009485243 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hasanabbasi_students |
| Created | 29 September 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hasanabbasi_students |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 11:15 | 8,665 | +8 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 10:17 | 8,657 | +12 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 12:01 | 8,645 | -2 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 13:00 | 8,647 | +1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:44 | 8,646 | -8 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 16:14 | 8,654 | -7 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 12:17 | 8,661 | +4 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 10:08 | 8,657 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 8,656 | -2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 10:07 | 8,658 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:50 | 8,659 | +5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:01 | 8,654 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:23 | 8,654 | first reading |
167 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 21 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 167 (5 August 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,660 |
| Reactions total | 122 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 16:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 61 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,039 reactions across 135 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 301 | 29.0% | |
| ❤ | 280 | 26.9% | |
| 🤬 | 136 | 13.1% | |
| 👌 | 53 | 5.10% | |
| 💔 | 46 | 4.43% | |
| 😱 | 46 | 4.43% | |
| 😁 | 45 | 4.33% | |
| 👏 | 30 | 2.89% | |
| 😢 | 28 | 2.69% | |
| 😭 | 24 | 2.31% | |
| 🔥 | 17 | 1.64% | |
| 👎 | 12 | 1.15% | |
| 🤣 | 10 | 0.962% | |
| 🙏 | 5 | 0.481% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 0.289% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.192% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.096% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 144 of the 167 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,068 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 167 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hasanabbasi_students. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 167 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🔰 وزیر خزانهداری آمریکا، اسکات بسنت، که شوهر و بچهش رو تو عکس مشاهده میکنید، جنگ اقتصادی علیه ایران رو اعلام کرد. 🔹 تاریخ فراموش نخواهد کرد که دشمنان مردم ایران مشتی همجنس باز، پدوفیل، جنایتکار، دروغگو، فاسد و احمق بودند. @Hasanabbasi_students
👍6❤2
🌹 خصوصیات شهید سیده بشری حسینی خامنهای از منظر همسرشون حدود الهی را رعایت می کرد. اهل حلال و حرام بود. هرگز دروغ نمی گفت. اهل غیبت نبود. بدگویی نمی کرد. اگر درددلی می کرد اسم شخص رو نمی گفت. در موازین شرعی حساسیت داشت. به اسراف حساس بود. ما دور ریز نداشتیم از غذا و خوراکی. اهل عوض کردن تند تند وسایل نبود. چند مدل غذا برای مهمان درست نمی کرد. میوه های نوبرانه ی گران نمی خرید. صبر می کرد وقتی همه توانستند بخرند می خر…
👍5❤3
🔰 ماجرای دروغ جنجالی که بهانه تاختن به ایران و اسلام در داخل و خارج بود! ❓پرونده سکینه محمدی آشتیانی رو یادتون هست؟ 🔹️ امیرعباس ربیعی کارگردان و نویسنده در چند استوری به گزارش دروغ خبرنگار گاردین و ماجرای مستند ندا آقاسلطان پرداخته است. متن کامل استوریها👇 https://roubesh.ir/post/8950 @Hasanabbasi_students
🤬4
🔰 یادتونه تا چند سال پیش سر سنگسار سکینه محمدی در مجامع حقوق بشری و شبکه های اجتماعی چه هجمهی سنگینی به ایران و نظام آوردند؟ کار بجایی رسید که غربیها حتی فیلم سنگسار ثریا رو ساختند که تبعات زیادی هم داشت... 🔹 حالا نویسنده اون مقاله در گاردین، بعد از ۱۶ سال دیروز اعلام کرده مطلب از اساس کذب بوده و صفر تا صدشو از خودش در آورده و داستان سرایی کرده. @Hasanabbasi_students
🤬4
🔰 دکتر سید یاسر جبرائیلی: الیگارشی، از هر دو جناح، ارز را بازنمیگرداند؛ آقایان ارز را بر مردم گران میکنند. الیگارشی، از هر دو جناح، سوخت را قاچاق میکند؛ آقایان سوخت را بر مردم گران میکنند. 🔹 قصه اقتصاد ایران پیچیده نیست، اما گشودن گرهاش هم آسان نیست؛ مستلزم یک جنگ تمامعیار با الیگارشی حاکم بر اقتصاد است. 🔹 تا دست الیگارشی از سفره ملت کوتاه نشود، بار فساد آنان بر دوش مردم خواهد ماند. 🔹 راه اصلاح، از گرانکردن…
👌7👍1
🔰 پیش بینی بسیار دقیق حمید رسایی 😱 🔹 رأی به مدنی زاده، برای وزارت اقتصاد، رأی به بنزین ۳۰ هزار تومان، دلار ۲۰۰ هزار تومان، و ... است 😔 #بورژوازی_اصلاحاتچیها #سرطان_اصلاح_طلبها #امویان_امت_خمینی_کبیر @Hasanabbasi_students
❤7
🔰 فرشاد مومنی: حرف پزشکیان که «اگر ارز ترجیحی حذف نمیشد، قحطی میآمد»؛ شرمآورترین حرف مقام کلیدی کشور در یک قرن اخیر است. @Hasanabbasi_students
ما اگر در نبرد نظامی با جبهه کفر آمریکا و اسراییل و استکبار پیروز شدیم علاوه بر توکل بر حضرت باری تعالی نامتقارن عمل کردیم یعنی در زمینی که دشمن تعریف کرده بود با قواعد خودمون بازی کردیم در جنگ اقتصادی هم اگر با قواعد دشمن بازی کنیم همین بانک ، بورس و ساختار باشه،شکست خواهیم خورد ✍ محمد وارسته لینک توییت 📡 @I_M_Doctrine
❤4
۶. آیات؛ نشانههای قابل مشاهدهی حقیقت غیب برای شناخت خدا، انسان تنها به وحی و پیامبران نیاز ندارد؛ بلکه خداوند در جهان بیرون و در وجود خود انسان نیز نشانههایی قرار داده است. قرآن میفرماید: سَنُرِیهِمْ آیَاتِنَا فِی الْآفَاقِ وَفِی أَنْفُسِهِمْ بهزودی نشانههای خود را در افقهای جهان و در وجود خودشان به آنان نشان خواهیم داد. (فصلت، ۵۳) آیات، غیب را بهطور کامل به شهود تبدیل نمیکنند، اما نشانههایی از آن حقیقت …
❤6
بسم الله الرحمن الرحیم ارتباط غیب با متعلقات هفتگانه ایمان ۱. غیب؛ آغاز گشودن افق ایمان ایمان از جایی آغاز میشود که انسان بپذیرد همهی حقیقت، در آنچه با چشم میبیند و با حواس خود درک میکند خلاصه نمیشود. قرآن میفرماید: الَّذِینَ یُؤْمِنُونَ بِالْغَیْبِ آنان که به غیب ایمان میآورند. (بقره، ۳) غیب، عرصهی حقیقتهای نادیدنی است؛ حقیقتهایی که انسان بهتنهایی و با ابزار حس و تجربه نمیتواند به همهی ابعاد آن د…
❤6
✅ مقصر مشکلات اقتصادی کیست؟ 🗓 ۹ دی ۱۳۹۶ - مدرسه عالی شهید مطهری 💬 استاد حسن عباسی @Hasanabbasi_ir
👍1
🔰 نقشه راه جریان کودتا ✍ منصور کاظمی سخنان مسعود نیلی در مرداد ۱۴۰۳ درباره اینکه «اقتصاد ایران دیگر راهحل اقتصادی ندارد» و حل بحرانها را مستلزم تغییرات سیاسی، اجتماعی و سپس عادیسازی روابط خارجی میداند، از نگاه منتقدان میتواند تصویری از یک زنجیره تغییر مرحلهای ارائه دهد. 🔹 از بحران اقتصادی تا تغییر ساختار منطق این دیدگاه را میتوان در یک زنجیره خلاصه کرد: بحران اقتصادی ← تغییر ساختار سیاسی ← آزادیهای اجتماعی…
Showing the 12 most recent of 167 posts we hold for @hasanabbasi_students. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 35 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اندیشهجویان استاد حسن عباسی” (@hasanabbasi_students), 8,665 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hasanabbasi_students.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.