https://t.me/osokinamarina

Channel
Осокина Марина
@osokinamarina
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,434subscribers
+41 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001510662745 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @osokinamarina |
| Created | Between 1 July 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/osokinamarina |
Topic
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 18:59 | 4,434 | +5 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 18:02 | 4,429 | +8 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 13:58 | 4,421 | +8 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:59 | 4,413 | +1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 01:47 | 4,412 | +5 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:43 | 4,407 | +1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:32 | 4,406 | +4 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:25 | 4,402 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:17 | 4,401 | +1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:45 | 4,400 | +7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:21 | 4,393 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:35 | 4,393 | first reading |
Engagement
5 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2m 30s
- Average length
- 2m 30s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
214 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 111 | 51.9% | |
| 🔥 | 73 | 34.1% | |
| 👍 | 15 | 7.01% | |
| 🥰 | 15 | 7.01% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 214 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Цистит - не один диагноз, а несколько разных состояний ⠀ За диагнозом "цистит" стоят состояния с разной этиологией, разным патогенезом и разной тактикой. Специалисту, который работает с тазовым регионом, важно понимать, с какой формой имеет дело пациент, и где проходит граница его компетенции. ⠀ Острый неосложненный. Самая частая форма: половина женщин переносит инфекцию мочевых путей хотя бы раз в жизни, ведущий воз…
🔥12❤6👍2
Укрепляем тазовое дно: 4 книги с проверенными методиками 🧘♀️ Здоровье и комфорт женщины во многом зависят от состояния мышц тазового дна, но об этом часто говорят вполголоса, а знания остаются разрозненными. А ведь грамотная работа с этой зоной помогает быстрее восстанавливаться после родов, избегать дискомфорта и поддерживать общий тонус тела. 💪 Мышцы тазового дна 💪 Книга упражнений для прокачки мышц тазового дна…
❤22🔥22
В конце мая на свет появилась моя вторая книга «Послеродовое восстановление: почему каждой маме надо знать, как меняется тело во время беременности и после родов и что с этим делать». Спасибо тем, кто уже прочитал за теплые отзывы 🥰 На мой взгляд, именно после родов женщина максимально уязвима… Центром вселенной становится ребенок, гормональный шторм, усталость, недовольство своим телом, да и много чего ещё. И кругом…
❤41🔥28👍4
Делюсь двумя упражнениями для разминки грудного отдела позвоночника. Полезно всем 💯
❤42🥰15🔥11👍9
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @osokinamarina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@marina_kostrova · 86,346
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 August 2026
@Lena_Pyatibrat · 36,970
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 1 September 2026
@trenersemenov · 22,844
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 September 2026
@anastasiyalunegova · 73,918
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 August 2026
@newyorkfitspo · 109,354
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026
@fssru · 21,734
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 22 September 2026
@kanalsvoboden · 21,841
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 September 2026
@lelyasavosina · 32,845
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 4 September 2026
@mashablinovafit · 280,537
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026
@sensfitness · 25,102
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 September 2026
@baykinaolga · 51,120
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Осокина Марина” (@osokinamarina), 4,434 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/osokinamarina.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.