Доброе мрачное утро 🌸🌸 🌸🌸 Песню запевай 🎶 Я календарь…..переверну….
custom 51999548684831661566custom 53034274467569124493

Channel
@pushkinanatalie
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
69,120subscribers
-524 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001290321380 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pushkinanatalie |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 27 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pushkinanatalie |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:03 | 69,120 | -301 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:22 | 69,421 | -100 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 07:15 | 69,521 | -128 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 06:55 | 69,649 | -203 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 09:28 | 69,852 | -102 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 10:17 | 69,954 | -181 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 06:43 | 70,135 | -126 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:07 | 70,261 | -141 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:22 | 70,402 | -79 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:36 | 70,481 | -180 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 21:17 | 70,661 | -68 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 08:58 | 70,729 | -105 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:32 | 70,834 | -92 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 21:41 | 70,926 | -144 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 20:15 | 71,070 | -70 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 23:28 | 71,140 | -69 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:18 | 71,209 | -91 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 13:08 | 71,300 | -143 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:34 | 71,443 | -44 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:34 | 71,487 | first reading |
131 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 131 (5 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 676,069 |
| Reactions total | 29,257 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 04:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 70 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
28,763 reactions across 126 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 8,903 | 31.0% | |
| custom 5303427446756912449 | 6,254 | 21.7% | |
| custom 5397761730489123657 | 4,519 | 15.7% | |
| 🤣 | 2,936 | 10.2% | |
| 🥰 | 2,087 | 7.26% | |
| 👍 | 1,500 | 5.22% | |
| custom 5303441345271077544 | 1,079 | 3.75% | |
| 🤩 | 758 | 2.64% | |
| 🙏 | 353 | 1.23% | |
| custom 5199954868483166156 | 325 | 1.13% | |
| custom 5303082840055914005 | 31 | 0.108% | |
| custom 5303214231695433102 | 18 | 0.063% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 131 of the 131 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29,257 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 131 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2SDnjbsrrr7 | 1 | 29 August 2026 | 29 August 2026 |
| 2SDnjc1EQq9 | 1 | 5 August 2026 | 5 August 2026 |
| 2SDnjc9Cw71 | 1 | 8 August 2026 | 8 August 2026 |
| 2SDnjcD8fcF | 1 | 7 August 2026 | 7 August 2026 |
| 2SDnjcEYKXq | 1 | 29 August 2026 | 29 August 2026 |
| 2SDnjcvUFjh | 1 | 16 August 2026 | 16 August 2026 |
| 2SDnjd5UaR1 | 1 | 26 August 2026 | 26 August 2026 |
| 2SDnjdVnH3H | 1 | 9 August 2026 | 9 August 2026 |
| 2SDnje7MyoZ | 1 | 10 August 2026 | 10 August 2026 |
| 2SDnjeHAL99 | 1 | 25 August 2026 | 25 August 2026 |
| 2SDnjeYa9HM | 1 | 2 September 2026 | 2 September 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 131 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Доброе мрачное утро 🌸🌸 🌸🌸 Песню запевай 🎶 Я календарь…..переверну….
custom 51999548684831661566custom 53034274467569124493
Мы сегодня сгоняли к ортодонту) Тк в июне Симе сняли пластинку и брекеты, то решено было посмотреть насколько сильный откат будет к сентябрю! В итоге все ттт норм, с учетом 2 новых зубов) Не будем мы делать детские элайнеры, дождемся 13 лет и поставим уже полноценные элайнеры или брекеты. Потом ездили за цветами, тк завтра др у учителя хора, маме взяла 2 орхидеи - она их любит) ну и себе взяли😅
custom 539776173048912365775custom 530344134527107754419
#wowнаходки 🤩 Кто просил повторить ссылки на эти сумки: Это малышка balenciaga - ссылка скрытая, приходит в коробке и с брелком/со всеми лого 📌https://ali.click/ot1tk1c?erid=2SDnjeYa9HM Скорее всего двумя посылками как с уггами было, помните? Сначала приходит какая-то фигня, а следом вторая посылка с сумкой! 📌И вторая большая https://ali.click/m02tk1i?erid=2SDnjdNP3oR Все аналогично👌🏼 А эти две без лого, но в о…
custom 539776173048912365723👍4
Вам еще не хвасталась своей новой находкой! Вот все не просто так и моя любовь к цветам и посуде нашли точку пересечения в шкафу квартире Портофино🤩 Я ее тут же срисовала себе в wish list и начала поиски! На авито она дешевле, но там можно нарваться на подделку😅 В комментах продолжу фотки, а тут вам немного истории: Бренд посуды Portmeirion был основан в 1960 году, когда дизайнер Сьюзен Уильямс-Эллис вместе с супруг…
custom 530344134527107754475🔥33custom 53034274467569124497
Я и сама не знала😅
👍93🔥30🤩12custom 53977617304891236578🤣2custom 53034274467569124491
Осеннее настроение🍂
custom 5303427446756912449111custom 539776173048912365739🔥20🥰3custom 53034413452710775443
Доброе Утро 🤩 Вчера эта штука устроила мне утро с огоньком😅 Кто не понял - это гейзерная кофеварка, которой я пользуюсь не первый раз, но 1 сентября могло стать последним🤭 В 6:30 вкл плиту - поставила кофе и начала разбирать посудомойку….и тут баааах! Верх кофеварки отлетает вверх, ударяется об металл вытяжки (хорошо не о стеклянный купол) отскакивает к столу и весь кофе разлетается брызгами по всей кухне! Сима приб…
custom 5397761730489123657180custom 519995486848316615646🔥34🙏25🤣15
Сама серьезность) сегодня музыкалка началась 🎶
🥰151custom 530344134527107754438custom 539776173048912365729custom 530342744675691244910custom 53030828400559140051
С началом учебного года🍂 Мы в 4-й класс👩🏼🏫
custom 5303427446756912449265custom 530344134527107754455custom 539776173048912365735🤩16🔥13👍3🥰3
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥162custom 539776173048912365765👍27custom 530342744675691244911🥰2
Мой август запомнился таким💔 Сейчас уже все больше похоже на сон и если бы не фото, то я бы так и решила))) А теперь вы! Кидайте в комментариях свои фото Августа🫶🏼
🔥204custom 539776173048912365781custom 530342744675691244922🥰5🤩3
Photo, posted without a caption
🤣147custom 530342744675691244941🔥28👍14🥰4
Showing the 12 most recent of 131 posts we hold for @pushkinanatalie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 25 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Пушкина Натали” (@pushkinanatalie), 69,120 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pushkinanatalie.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.