💎 لینک ثبت نام وبینار MONEY GAME💎 ظرفیت به شدت محدود ✅ کاملا رایگان بزن رو لینک زیر 👇🏼 https://raminyadollazadeh.com/forms/bazi_pol

Channel
رامین یداله زاده | رشد مالی 🏅
@raminyadollazadeh
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
28,747subscribers
+7,092 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001458460075 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @raminyadollazadeh |
| Description | مدیر عامل شرکت دانش بنیان پیشگامان مسیر رشد بنیانگذار دستیار هوشمند اتو ادمین دکتری مدیریت - Marketing ❌ بهت یاد میدم چجوری تو همین شرایط بتونی از کسب و کارت پول بسازی و با سرمایه گذاری درست چند برابرش کنی 💵🌟 بیزنس + فرصت سرمایه گذاری ✅ |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 29 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/raminyadollazadeh |
Topic
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 03:57 | 28,747 | +254 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 21:02 | 28,493 | +311 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 05:22 | 28,182 | +849 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 11:38 | 27,333 | +1,262 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 06:59 | 26,071 | +499 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 21:35 | 25,572 | +476 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 11:17 | 25,096 | +124 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 23:58 | 24,972 | +177 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 21:14 | 24,795 | +178 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:44 | 24,617 | -54 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:13 | 24,671 | -41 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 20:26 | 24,712 | +28 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:24 | 24,684 | +40 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:24 | 24,644 | +211 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:03 | 24,433 | +208 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:32 | 24,225 | +195 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:23 | 24,030 | +254 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 16:36 | 23,776 | +353 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 23:59 | 23,423 | +205 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:58 | 23,218 | first reading |
Engagement
212 posts held, back to 10 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 52 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.16%
- avg views ÷ 28,747 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 908
- 119 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.927%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 120
- of 212 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 84 of 119 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 212 (10 August 2026 – 24 September 2026) |
| Views total | 108,105 |
| Reactions total | 745 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 24 Sept 2026, 15:39 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 154
- Videos
- 41
- Links
- 38
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 10m 40s
- Average length
- 36s
Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,259 reactions across 151 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 632 | 50.2% | |
| 👍 | 289 | 23.0% | |
| 🔥 | 169 | 13.4% | |
| 👏 | 43 | 3.42% | |
| 💯 | 39 | 3.10% | |
| ❤🔥 | 22 | 1.75% | |
| 👎 | 22 | 1.75% | |
| 😁 | 11 | 0.874% | |
| 🕊 | 7 | 0.556% | |
| 🤷♀ | 6 | 0.477% | |
| 🎉 | 5 | 0.397% | |
| 💔 | 5 | 0.397% | |
| 🤷 | 5 | 0.397% | |
| 🤩 | 4 | 0.318% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 155 of the 212 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,259 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 212 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
👋 رفیق من قراره تو وبینار کاملـا رایـگان بهت همه اینهارو بگم😍: ❌اگر نمیخوای شش ماه دیگه دوباره بگی: «کاش همون موقع شروع میکردم!» همین الان بزن رو لینک زیر تو وبینار ثبت نام کن ✨کمکت کنم با پول کم شروعکنی اگر : خانه داری به فکر شغل دوم هستی درآمد ماهانت کمه یا حتی میخوای تخصصی این بازار یاد بگیری ✅
بهترین بازار برای شروع با سرمایه کم حتی ۵ میلیون 💎 بازار معامله گری با طلاست 💎 اما قبلش باید بدونی ❌ چه طلایی بخری ؟ کی فیزیکی بخری کی فقط معامله کنی؟ چطور اربیتراژ کنی ؟ چطور پله ای وارد بشی ؟ و چطور مدیریت ریسک کنی ؟
✅حالا بذار بهت بگم چه موقعیت های مالی هست که با پول کم میشه شروع کرد : ۱.صندوق های بورس ۲.معامله گری طلا ۳.شناسایی ایده های پولساز دوست داری بدونی راجبش؟ 👋
❌گاهی چیزی که باعث میشه جا بمونی ، کم بودن پول نیست …! ندونستن موقعیت ها دیر اقدام کردن و موانع ذهنـیته ❌
👍3❤1
✅رفیق همین الان من کلی دانشجو دارم که با ۱۰میلیون شروع کرده و خرد خرد سرمایش رو بیشتر کرده 🏆 دقیقا همین تایمی که تو داری سعی میکنی پولت رو به یه عدد گنده برسونی بعد سرمایه گذاری کنی اونم با این تورم لحظه ای تو کشور ❌
👍2
❌حالا فکر کن ۲۰میلیون پول داشته باشی اگر فقط ماهی ۲میلیون هم بهش اضافه میکردی، بعد از ۶ ماه ، بدون در نظر گرفتن هیچ سودی ، سرمایهات میشد : ۳۲میـلیـون تومان ✨💸 💭حالا تصور کن این پول به جای راکد موندن ، متناسب با ریسک پذیریت وارد یه سری موقعیت های سرمایه گذاری بشه …
❤2
🚫 اشتباه کردن تو هر بخشی از زندگی خودش یک فرآیند یادگیری است 👈 مشکل اینجاست که خیلیها میخوان بدون اشتباه موفق بشن. 👈 درحالیکه رشد دقیقاً پشت همان اشتباهاته یا ازش یاد میگیری یا دوباره پرداختش میکنی!
❤5
تا اینجا چه قدر با حرفــ هام موافقی ؟ ❌ واقعا فرصت های مالی نسبت به قبل بیشتر و گسترده تر شده💎
👍8
👋رفیق اینو در نظر بگیر که با این همه موقعیت برای سرمایه گذاری، دیگه نیازی نیست از روز صفر پول درشت داشته باشی ، میتونی با مبلغ کم شروع کنی✅ یاد بگیری .. کم کم سرمایهات رو رشد بدی و بعد روی موقعیت های بزرگ و فرصت های خوب ادامه بدی ✌🏻
👍6
❌ حالا مشکل اینجاست که خیلی ها برای سرمایه گذاری منتظر یه پول درشت و زیاد هستن !! ولی به این فکر نمیکنی که : با همین ۲۰میـلیون یا ۳۰ میـلیون میشه چیکار کرد ؟!؟ 💸
👇🏼 جالبه خیلی از جواب ها با وجود متفاوت بودن اخرش به یه نقطه میرسن … ✨پــول✨ ✅یعنی اینکه: درامدمون کافیه ؟ پس اندازمون چی میشه؟ با پولی که داریم چیکار کنیم ؟ و..
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 212 posts we hold for @raminyadollazadeh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
❌بیشترین دغدغهات برای ۶ماه دوم سال ۱۴۰۵ چیه ؟؟
- بیشتر شدن درآمد 💸75%
- حفظ ارزش پول✨14%
- شروع سرمایه گذاری💎23%
- جبران عقب افتادگی مالی😕25%
The shares total 137%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 212 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2026 to 24 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@social_kia · 2,002#1
@dore_mohadese · 22,874#2
@mehdidoosti_com · 1,667#3
@academymardani · 3,151#4
@zangedanesh · 59,398#5
@saman_abbaspour · 15,641#6
@khanemohtavaa · 21,724#7
@hivadacademy1 · 4,069#8
@academysafari · 29,065#9
@Tivan_mobile · 5,775#10
@instapeyman · 25,996#11
@ketabdooni · 148,714#12
@abolfazl_nouriii · 95,761#13
@SaharCast · 34,402#14
@karentteam · 89,726#15
@coffeenamiasr · 12,059#16
@iOSF1 · 56,476#17
@youtubershocourse · 14,805#18
@editorfarzad · 52,803#19
@soundofmybooks · 887#20
@danial_gelardi_music · 3,129#21
@REDPLUS_IR · 42,946#22
@tapswap_tasks · 5,931#23
@potography_ideaa · 9,808#24
@farzzadsoleimani · 17,173#25
@rahavfx · 39,944#26
@mona_admin75 · 32,599#27
@YasamanIELTS · 14,128#28
@mozik_mazeni · 24,677#29
@ladyboss_etemad · 101,233#30
@varzesh3 · 1,294,925#31
@zdiarz · 15,065#32
@paidarmehdi · 7,874#33
@story_motion2 · 24,030#34
@Robolandio · 175,029#35
@aircrp · 27,078#36
@PXTicker · 25,767#37
@adelkhaan · 53,461#38
@amirhoseinvalian · 33,927#39
@khabarforui · 171,115#40
@RegaPlus · 1,474,377#41
@nobitexmarket · 319,385#42
@payam_nsi · 147,497#43
@toncoin_fa · 409,894#44
@roidbest · 1,644,807#45
@ieltsben1 · 1,888#46
@nafiscons · 44,404#47
@notcoin · 8,643,687#48
@hamster_kombat · 20,982,519#49
@aibetradecom · 12,128#50
@hedgehoginthefogen · 263,179#51
@toranji · 128,929#52
@Kripto_Azbuk · 293,747#53
@cultofnot · 1,027,411#54
@crypto_vestnic · 209,230#55
@stukach_trading · 311,096#56
@beercoinchannel · 706,892#57
@finansist_busines · 624,235#58
@dogs · 7,065,215#59
@builders · 3,431,951#60
@Anton_cryptoo · 144,788#61
@watersolmeme · 1,140,826#62
@wuffi_announcements · 1,129,137#63
@blumcrypto · 14,360,001#64
@trendingapps · 3,812,897#65
@roxman · 7,057,063#66
@i_font · 120,243#67
@tomo_cat · 2,145,214#68
@VenomFoundationOfficial · 884,520#69
@unicorn_crypt · 511,608#70
@CRYPTO_insider_deutscher · 1,144,637#71
@INSIDER_Nachrichten · 1,116,706#72
@INSIDER_UK_NEWS · 1,185,207#73
@CRYPTO_insidderr · 1,533,865#74
@babydogecoin · 1,019,704#75
@CRYPTO_jokker · 2,027,438#76
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@dore_mohadese · 22,874
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 19 September 2026
@ladyboss_etemad · 101,233
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 15 August 2026
@nafiscons · 44,404
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 12 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“رامین یداله زاده | رشد مالی 🏅” (@raminyadollazadeh), 28,747 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/raminyadollazadeh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.