Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ГЮЗЕЛЬ ГАРАЕВА | ШКОЛА УП «КОМПАС»

Channel

ГЮЗЕЛЬ ГАРАЕВА | ШКОЛА УП «КОМПАС»

@schoolhrcompass

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,631subscribers

-67 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001398754384
TypeChannel
Username@schoolhrcompass
CreatedBetween 1 December 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/schoolhrcompass

Growth

9,6319,6989,664.56 August 2026 — 9,698 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,698 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,681 subscribers13 August 2026 — 9,666 subscribers17 August 2026 — 9,661 subscribers20 August 2026 — 9,665 subscribers24 August 2026 — 9,650 subscribers26 August 2026 — 9,636 subscribers30 August 2026 — 9,631 subscribers6 August 202630 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 23 days, net -67. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,621–9,708 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 02:169,631-5
26 Aug 2026, 23:439,636-14
24 Aug 2026, 01:459,650-15
20 Aug 2026, 15:119,665+4
17 Aug 2026, 12:049,661-5
13 Aug 2026, 16:499,666-15
10 Aug 2026, 10:079,681-17
7 Aug 2026, 04:269,698no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:039,698first reading

Engagement

73 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.82%
avg views ÷ 9,631 subscribers
Avg views / post
271
68 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.21%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
69
of 73 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 43 of 68 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held73 (30 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total18,447
Reactions total267
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 05:42 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 57s
Average length
37s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

307 reactions across 45 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
14145.9%
🔥13142.7%
👍175.54%
❤‍🔥41.30%
👏41.30%
😁30.977%
😍30.977%
🥰30.977%
😎10.326%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 46 of the 73 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 307reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 73 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 17:02 UTC100 viewsread 29 August 2026
Poll

А к 1 сентября готовы?

  1. Всегда готов/а8%
  2. Физически - да, морально - нет🥲46%
  3. Мне без разницы, нет школьников)46%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

28 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC100 viewsread 29 August 2026
Poll

Кто насладился летом сполна?

  1. Я17%
  2. Не успел/а понять, как оно пролетело…63%
  3. Всё лето работал/а25%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

28 Aug 2026, 10:23 UTC149 views6 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

Последняя летняя тренировка!!! Пока не вышла из ритма, надо сегодня организовать себе такие же в Москве. После каждой тренировки уважаю себя!!!

🔥3👏2👍1

Signed Гюзель Гараева

28 Aug 2026, 05:44 UTC172 views3 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

НЕМНОГО О НОВЫХ ЗАКОНАХ🧑‍💼 Недавно мы с Оксаной Сырых записали эфир, в котором поговорили и том, что делать с платформенными самозанятыми и как подготовиться к изменениям. Оксана - директором практики HR-консалтинга Unicon Outsourcing. Это лидер рынка аутсорсинга учётных функций в России. Мы подробно разобрали, в каких случаях работа с платформенным исполнителем может быть расценена как подмена трудовых отношений,

2🔥1

27 Aug 2026, 17:11 UTC181 views2 reactionsread 29 August 2026
File

СИНИЦА ИЛИ ЖУРАВЛЬ? Карьерные тупики отнимают много энергии. В «Подкасте от Гюзель» даю несколько упражнений, которые помогут в принятии решения: — какие 8 критериев стоит учитывать при выборе работы, и почему нужно выбрать 3 из них; — как понять, что для вас действительно важно, а чем можно пожертвовать; — как справиться со страхом отказов и не сдаться слишком рано; — и почему я не очень верю в карьерный дауншифти

🔥2

27 Aug 2026, 05:28 UTC195 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

СЕБЯ ПОКАЗАТЬ, НА ЛЮДЕЙ ПОСМОТРЕТЬ Рассказала полную картину - что ждет вас на бизнес-завтраке 13-го сентября. А для самых ленивых - тех, кто не хочет смотреть видео полностью - пишу краткую сводку: 1. Современные тренды ИИ 2. Конкретные кейсы 3. Уникальный генеральный директор, выросший из HR 4. Возможность расширить свой нетворк 5. Абсолютно новая площадка 6. Вкусная еда Это возможность и себя показать, и на люд

1

26 Aug 2026, 17:37 UTC221 views18 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

ИНВАЛИДЫ НАМ НЕ НУЖНЫ Последние дни наполнены обсуждениями неоднозначных увольнений: сначала питерский бренд, потом «Вкусно - и точка». На этот раз заставили уволиться сотрудницу популярной фаст-фуд сети, у которой онкологическое заболевание и инвалидность I группы. Когда я работала в ОБИ, у нас была похожая ситуация, только мы вышли из нее иначе. Наша менеджер по налогам сказала, что у нее онкология. И она попроси

18

26 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC239 views4 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

ОБРАЩЕНИЕ В «HR ВЕРУ» Если честно, я вообще не очень верю в сильного HR, который просто хорошо выполняет набор функций. В этой профессии нужно быть немного миссионером. И уметь обращать аборигенов коллег в «HR-верой». И у меня есть несколько шагов, которые помогают эту веру превратить в реальный профессиональный вес. Первое - начать завоёвывать авторитет в компании. Разберитесь, на чем компания зарабатывает деньги

4

25 Aug 2026, 17:28 UTC232 views10 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

ПРО ДУМАТЬ И ДЕЛАТЬ Про баланс работы и отдыха написано уже, кажется, всё, что только можно написать. А вот баланс между «подумать» и «сделать» мне гораздо интереснее. За свою жизнь я видела огромное количество очень умных людей. И я заметила, что иногда именно высокий интеллект и прекрасные аналитические возможности мешает человеку начать. Например, я человек дела, и Тимур пошел в меня. Он не успел даже до конца

👍8🔥2

25 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC249 viewsread 29 August 2026

Дорогие подписчики, сегодня в 16:00 Мск я проведу первый урок ОБЖ для HR. На нем мы с вами будем разбирать, как помочь компании жить и развиваться в условиях кризиса, и что при этом могут сделать HR-ы Обязательно поставьте себе напоминание в календаре, поскольку этот урок должен прослушать каждый HR Я обязательно буду

25 Aug 2026, 05:01 UTC256 views0 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

НА НАС СНОВА НАПИСАЛИ ОТЗЫВЫ Продолжаем ими делиться, потому что всегда приятно смотреть на результаты и развитие людей. ✔️У Юлии и Валентины, кажется, всё получилось ровно так, как мы и задумали. Они прокачали уверенность в себе через PR и политику, научились говорить с бизнесом на языке цифр и увидели свои точки роста. А Юлия после обучения ещё и внедрила в компании кадровый резерв. Про него я уже рассказывала в

Showing the 12 most recent of 73 posts we hold for @schoolhrcompass. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@schoolhrcompass edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
24 August 2026

Polls

The 6 most recent of 8 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Aug 2026, 17:02 UTCAnonymous Poll24 voters

А к 1 сентября готовы?

  1. Всегда готов/а8%
  2. Физически - да, морально - нет🥲46%
  3. Мне без разницы, нет школьников)46%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

28 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTCAnonymous Poll24 voters

Кто насладился летом сполна?

  1. Я17%
  2. Не успел/а понять, как оно пролетело…63%
  3. Всё лето работал/а25%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

14 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTCAnonymous Poll37 voters

Как вам шапочка?

  1. Нравится62%
  2. Вроде бы нравится, а вроде бы и нет24%
  3. Не нравится14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Aug 2026, 17:07 UTCAnonymous Poll44 voters

Нужно ли работать в студенческие годы?

  1. Нужно55%
  2. По желанию45%
  3. Не нужно0%
  4. Зумеры не хотят😂2%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

11 Aug 2026, 08:14 UTCAnonymous Poll31 voters

Почему сложно говорить «нет»

  1. Боюсь обидеть48%
  2. Начинаю мямлить и не получается16%
  3. Боюсь за последствия. Как бы хуже не стало35%
  4. Свой ответ16%

The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

11 Aug 2026, 08:11 UTCAnonymous Poll42 voters

Легко ли вам говорить нет

  1. Да, это просто слово10%
  2. Мне сложно24%
  3. Зависит от ситуации71%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 73 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 131,123 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Эйчаргейт| Перезагрузка
@hrgate · 56,190
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 28 August 2026
Кадровику
@kadroviku · 45,277
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ГЮЗЕЛЬ ГАРАЕВА | ШКОЛА УП «КОМПАС»” (@schoolhrcompass), 9,631 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/schoolhrcompass.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.