Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Клуб директоров: патриотические предприниматели России

Channel

Клуб директоров: патриотические предприниматели России

@Dirclub

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

17,617subscribers

+37 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001394855460
TypeChannel
Username@Dirclub
Created3 November 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Dirclub

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 3 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (5 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@Dirclub/13857 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 10:10 UTC@businesslogy/51443 Aug 2026, 10:13 UTC1.003 minutes
@Dirclub/13861 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 07:48 UTC@businesslogy/51484 Aug 2026, 07:48 UTC1.00under a minute
@Dirclub/13873 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC@businesslogy/51525 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC1.0072 seconds
@Dirclub/13885 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 10:10 UTC@businesslogy/51546 Aug 2026, 10:40 UTC1.0030 minutes
@businesslogy/51567 Aug 2026, 12:54 UTC@Dirclub/13891 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 13:43 UTC1.0049 minutes
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@businesslogy5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.003 minutesthis entry (41)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 29 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @Podslushano_bisnes. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

17,51917,62417,571.56 August 2026 — 17,580 subscribers6 August 2026 — 17,580 subscribers6 August 2026 — 17,577 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,574 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,571 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,577 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,570 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,561 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,555 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,551 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,536 subscribers16 August 2026 — 17,539 subscribers17 August 2026 — 17,527 subscribers18 August 2026 — 17,519 subscribers19 August 2026 — 17,541 subscribers20 August 2026 — 17,540 subscribers21 August 2026 — 17,543 subscribers23 August 2026 — 17,565 subscribers25 August 2026 — 17,592 subscribers25 August 2026 — 17,596 subscribers26 August 2026 — 17,613 subscribers27 August 2026 — 17,615 subscribers29 August 2026 — 17,621 subscribers29 August 2026 — 17,618 subscribers30 August 2026 — 17,624 subscribers1 September 2026 — 17,617 subscribers1 September 2026 — 17,623 subscribers3 September 2026 — 17,621 subscribers4 September 2026 — 17,622 subscribers7 September 2026 — 17,615 subscribers10 September 2026 — 17,608 subscribers12 September 2026 — 17,617 subscribers14 September 2026 — 17,622 subscribers15 September 2026 — 17,618 subscribers17 September 2026 — 17,617 subscribers17,6176 August 202617 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 43 days, net +37. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,503–17,640 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 23:5817,617-1
15 Sept 2026, 17:1817,618-4
14 Sept 2026, 03:3817,622+5
12 Sept 2026, 12:5617,617+9
10 Sept 2026, 11:2117,608-7
7 Sept 2026, 07:1817,615-7
4 Sept 2026, 15:2017,622+1
3 Sept 2026, 00:1517,621-2
1 Sept 2026, 23:5417,623+6
1 Sept 2026, 00:4517,617-7
30 Aug 2026, 23:1717,624+6
29 Aug 2026, 21:1217,618-3
29 Aug 2026, 00:4417,621+6
27 Aug 2026, 23:3417,615+2
26 Aug 2026, 21:2417,613+17
25 Aug 2026, 21:1517,596+4
25 Aug 2026, 00:4517,592+27
23 Aug 2026, 09:1617,565+22
21 Aug 2026, 18:2817,543+3
20 Aug 2026, 14:2217,540first reading

Engagement

170 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.95%
avg views ÷ 17,617 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,050
50 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.394%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
50
of 170 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 40 of 50 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held170 (3 August 20263 September 2026)
Views total52,450
Reactions total165
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 09:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 51s
Average length
36s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

654 reactions across 123 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
20731.7%
👍14722.5%
😁10215.6%
custom 53391712211561532998212.5%
🔥548.26%
🤬294.43%
👎233.52%
😱101.53%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 136 of the 170 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 697 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 170 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
3.53%
6 of 170 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
6
posts carrying an erid · 6 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
1,090
over 6 measured posts
Median views · rest
1,090
over 164 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2Vtzqv73Au9124 August 202624 August 2026
2VtzqwMtxAf114 August 202614 August 2026
2Vtzqwp2psV121 August 202621 August 2026
2VtzqxTS2ps124 August 202624 August 2026
2VtzqxV2LNo113 August 202613 August 2026
2W5zFGRcQBj121 August 202621 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 170 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 05:57 UTC545 views0 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

В пятницу в РФ умер обнал. Вместе с бумажным НДС Это не кликбейтный заголовок. Это новая реальность, которая дойдет до рынка чуть позже, с задержкой в месяц - рассказывает Михаил Жуховицкий. Я ранее писал, что ФНС с прокуратурой начали удалять отчетность техничек бумажного НДС. В июне я дал бумНДС срок жизни ещё в шесть месяцев, пока ФНС допиливает алгоритмы. Прошло всего два месяца. В пятницу ФНС разом убили 20+

2 Sept 2026, 15:20 UTC923 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Клуб директоров собрал каналы участников Изучайте 😎👇 ✅Сильнейший российский экономист вышел в публичное поле и канал "Экономизм" заиграл новыми красками. Он уже помог снизить порог НДС, подарил лопаты для снега депутатам, а теперь рассказывает, что будет после выборов. 10-15 минут - и вы знаете, как будет дальше и что делать. Присоединяйтесь! 🔵@businesslogy - Как образ мира предпринимателя отличается от остальных,

1

2 Sept 2026, 13:16 UTC896 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Признавайтесь. Как там ваш бизнес на самом деле Клуб продолжает проводить опросы бизнесменов. Скоро выложим результаты. Пройти сразу или читать зачем мы стараемся - С 1 сентября в России вступила в силу куча новых законов, которые про бизнес. Ну или против бизнеса. Смотря как посмотреть 🤣 Росфинмониторинг теперь видит все переводы через СБП, карты Мир и QR-коды. Банки могут замораживать переводы на 48 часов, если

2

2 Sept 2026, 12:34 UTC889 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Большинство людей так и проживут жизнь, думая, что им просто не везло На самом деле они просто не умели включать вторую систему. Книга «Думай медленно… решай быстро» от Даниэля Канемана поможем это изменить. Нобелевского лауреат Канеман разобрал мозг на винтики и доказал: мы не такие уж рациональные, как любим думать. Всё гениально просто: в голове живут две системы. Система 1 — быстрая. Внутренний спринтер на ав

🔥2

2 Sept 2026, 09:45 UTC≈1,000 views5 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Билл Гейтс написал длинное эссе по внедрению ИИ В чём-то соглашаясь с алармистскими прогнозами Дарио и указывая на риски непонимания политиками социальных последствий внедрения ИИ. Билл также признал, что заранее распознал перспективы ИИ-компаний и скупал их акции, сейчас его фонд за счёт этого вырос до $200 миллиардов долларов. Он собирается их потратить на применение ИИ в доступной медицине, включая разработку сре

😁3🔥2

2 Sept 2026, 06:47 UTC≈1,080 views3 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

📥ФНС начинает работать по новым правилам 1️⃣ Жалобы. Решение инспекции теперь может обжаловаться не только в своём управлении - жалобу передадут любому органу, уполномоченному ФНС, вплоть до другого региона. Плюс: смотрят со стороны, а не те, кто заинтересован в показателях подведомственной инспекции. Минус: вы не знаете заранее, кто рассматривает, и местная специфика больше не работает. Суд остаётся по месту вашего

3

2 Sept 2026, 05:17 UTC≈1,020 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026

31 августа: часы на складе стали деньгами Андрей Богер классный разбор делает по ситуации для бизнеса. Я так не умею, поэтому беру у него - Вчерашняя повестка сложилась вокруг одного изменения: бизнесу становится дороже просто «успевать как-нибудь». Деньги (выручка, прибыль, маржа, EBITDA) теперь зависят от скорости операции, качества данных и способности быстро переключить маршрут. 1. ЦБ ожидает плавного, а не быс

2

1 Sept 2026, 14:06 UTC≈1,050 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026

💳 С 1 сентября начинаются расчеты в цифровых рублях Вот я нашел подробности, как это будет устроено, у Регберри, спасибо им. 📅 С 1 сентября стартует повсеместное внедрение цифрового рубля как средства расчётов для бизнеса и граждан. На кассах уже появились соответствующие логотипы с универсальным QR-кодом от НСПК. Через него же доступны платежи по СБП и выбор банковских платежных сервисов во всех регионах. Бизнесу,

1👍1

1 Sept 2026, 13:40 UTC≈1,000 views3 reactionsread 3 September 2026

💸 С 1 сентября банки и крупные торговые сети обязали подключиться к платформе цифрового рубля — россияне смогут открывать кошельки, переводить деньги и оплачивать покупки. Один цифровой рубль равен обычному, переводы бесплатны, но процентов на остаток и кэшбэка не будет. Получать зарплату или пенсию в цифровых рублях пока можно только добровольно. Цифровой рубль - это деньги, которые можно потратить только на разреш

1👎1😱1

1 Sept 2026, 12:38 UTC≈1,010 views8 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

В России с 1 сентября ввели обязательную регистрацию кур Я нашел аналогии на Западе. И...расскажу,кому это надо - С сегодняшнего дня каждая курица в личном хозяйстве должна быть на учёте. Не шутка. Требования касаются уток, гусей, индеек, перепелов и даже страусов. Если у вас больше 10 голов, надо маркировать птичник. Вешать табличку с уникальным номером. Видную с полутора метров. Потом идти в ветеринарную службу

🤬6👍2

1 Sept 2026, 10:14 UTC973 views3 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Привезла с форума по деловому этикету не только удостоверение, но и озарения На форуме я ещё раз убедилась в одной простой вещи: самые сильные переговорщики — это не те, кто умеет говорить дольше всех. Это те, кто умеет слушать лучше всех. Кажется парадоксом? Ведь бизнес привык восхищаться ораторами: яркая презентация, уверенная речь, сильная аргументация. И сейчас так много видов обучения по данной теме! Но насто

3

Showing the 12 most recent of 170 posts we hold for @Dirclub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Dirclub edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
26 August 2026

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Aug 2026, 12:26 UTCAnonymous Poll55 voters

По случаю очередного финансового кризиса вы

  1. Заморозили косты и рекламу (не развиваетесь, пытаетесь выжить)24%
  2. Активно развиваемся, чтобы выжить с помощью новых тем (клиентов и тп)42%
  3. Ведём себя как в обычный год, не дёргаемся36%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

6 Aug 2026, 08:49 UTCAnonymous Poll41 voters

Надо на роботов помощников

  1. За налог, деньги людям пойдут, меньше людей уволят с работы39%
  2. Против налога, никакой экономии тогда61%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 170 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 37 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Управленцы в России
@businesslogy · 10,213
25 posts
Юрист | Право Политен
@pravopoliten · 14,202
16 posts
Афиша Клуба директоров
@eventdir · 131
11 posts
Новости Недвижимости Рф
@novostinedvijki · 11,133
9 posts
Медведев о проверках недвижимости
@MedvedevForRealty · 6,828
7 posts
НЕДВИЖКА🔑
@nedvizhkaaa2 · 16,921
7 posts
Мир Недвижимости
@theworldnedvij · 8,452
6 posts
СтройПлюс l Москва
@stroyplusmsk · 6,490
5 posts
English Law Report
@enlawreport · 7,478
4 posts
Небрехня
@nebrexnya · 106,520
4 posts
Рынок Недвижимости и дизайна России
@rinoknedvijrf · 9,812
4 posts
Юридическая практика
@upsvk · 7,152
4 posts
Всё о недвижке Рф
@Vse_oNedvijke · 10,388
4 posts
Ирина Бобко Про Недвижимость
@irinabobkomsk · 1,103
3 posts
Недвижимость в Городах Рф
@nedvijvgorodax · 9,712
3 posts
Патентные дела | Судебный юрист Вера Стукалова
@PatentDela · 2,670
3 posts
Строительство.Недвижимость.RU
@stroyRUnedvij · 12,224
3 posts
Метр² в квадрате | Недвижимость
@MetrKvad · 20,635
2 posts
ПОС ППР Профи
@pospprprofi · 5,070
2 posts
TREETON PARK
@treetonpark · 859
2 posts
НДС • УСН • Налоги | Бухгалтериат
@buhgalteriat · 6,337
1 post
Подслушано Клуб директоров
@Podslushano_bisnes · 1,983
1 post
3-НДФЛ. Налоги под контролем
@tvoi13procentov · 3,039
1 post
Валерий Казанцев | Все о #115ФЗ, #161ФЗ и взыскание долгов, о инвестициях и торгах
@valeriykazantsev · 3,877
1 post

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

Управленцы в России
@businesslogy · 10,213
9 posts
Медведев о проверках недвижимости
@MedvedevForRealty · 6,828
7 posts
V.ART | Подборки ВП
@v_art_tg · 74
7 posts
Агенство.GreenПапка
@Greenpapka · 339
5 posts
Мохов Н.В. Стратегия и тактика решения бизнес-конфликтов. Мифы и реальность
@mokhovnv · 1,729
5 posts
Юридическая практика
@upsvk · 7,152
5 posts
БОДРУМ . ДОМ У МОРЯ
@domusea · 3,365
4 posts
Адвокат ИЛЬИНА в сети
@ilyina_law_mediation · 561
4 posts
Патентные дела | Судебный юрист Вера Стукалова
@PatentDela · 2,670
4 posts
Юрист | Право Политен
@pravopoliten · 14,202
4 posts
НДС • УСН • Налоги | Бухгалтериат
@buhgalteriat · 6,337
3 posts
Ирина Бобко Про Недвижимость
@irinabobkomsk · 1,103
3 posts
Телеграм Петроченкова
@petrochenkow · 47,331
3 posts
Рынок Недвижимости и дизайна России
@rinoknedvijrf · 9,812
3 posts
Дьяков Константин | Юрист по банкротству
@bankrotstvo_dyakov · 294
2 posts
Денис Ермолов|Системный ПДСМ
@demer_llc · 7,108
2 posts
English Law Report
@enlawreport · 7,478
2 posts
Камила про предпринимателей
@kamila_tech · 5,319
2 posts
Константин Двинский
@Kdvinsky · 29,915
2 posts
Метр² в квадрате | Недвижимость
@MetrKvad · 20,635
2 posts
Рантьетолог • Андрей Никифоров
@rentietolog · 3,389
2 posts
РИА Недвижимость
@ria_realty · 63,396
2 posts
Валерий Казанцев | Все о #115ФЗ, #161ФЗ и взыскание долгов, о инвестициях и торгах
@valeriykazantsev · 3,877
2 posts
Точка Перехода: Продажи, Команда, Карьера
@you_and_career · 569
2 posts

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Business Father
@Business_father · 49,705
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 24 August 2026
Регулярный менеджмент для руководителей (Евгений Севастьянов)
@regularmanagement · 22,896
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 September 2026
Я — РУКОВОДИТЕЛЬ
@iRukovoditel · 31,246
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 6 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Клуб директоров: патриотические предприниматели России” (@Dirclub), 17,617 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Dirclub.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.