Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for FitStars💪 домашние тренировки

Channel

FitStars💪 домашние тренировки

@FitStarsClub

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

104,410subscribers

+7,591 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001191631510
TypeChannel
Username@FitStarsClub
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/FitStarsClub

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

96,819104,410100,614.55 August 2026 — 96,819 subscribers6 August 2026 — 96,819 subscribers6 August 2026 — 96,826 subscribers7 August 2026 — 96,933 subscribers8 August 2026 — 97,138 subscribers9 August 2026 — 97,080 subscribers10 August 2026 — 97,188 subscribers11 August 2026 — 97,310 subscribers12 August 2026 — 97,349 subscribers13 August 2026 — 97,366 subscribers14 August 2026 — 97,456 subscribers16 August 2026 — 97,506 subscribers17 August 2026 — 97,546 subscribers18 August 2026 — 97,607 subscribers19 August 2026 — 97,743 subscribers20 August 2026 — 97,805 subscribers21 August 2026 — 97,841 subscribers23 August 2026 — 97,911 subscribers24 August 2026 — 97,914 subscribers25 August 2026 — 97,891 subscribers26 August 2026 — 99,474 subscribers27 August 2026 — 100,417 subscribers28 August 2026 — 101,125 subscribers29 August 2026 — 101,646 subscribers30 August 2026 — 104,007 subscribers31 August 2026 — 104,410 subscribers5 August 202631 August 2026
26 measurements spanning 26 days, net +7,591. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 95,680–105,549 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 18:02104,410+403
30 Aug 2026, 14:57104,007+2,361
29 Aug 2026, 16:44101,646+521
28 Aug 2026, 19:14101,125+708
27 Aug 2026, 18:17100,417+943
26 Aug 2026, 19:3499,474+1,583
25 Aug 2026, 20:0697,891-23
24 Aug 2026, 17:3397,914+3
23 Aug 2026, 04:4397,911+70
21 Aug 2026, 16:4697,841+36
20 Aug 2026, 15:5397,805+62
19 Aug 2026, 15:4297,743+136
18 Aug 2026, 14:4397,607+61
17 Aug 2026, 17:4497,546+40
16 Aug 2026, 15:2297,506+50
14 Aug 2026, 23:4397,456+90
13 Aug 2026, 14:1797,366+17
12 Aug 2026, 15:5397,349+39
11 Aug 2026, 13:1797,310+122
10 Aug 2026, 12:1897,188first reading

Engagement

101 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.97%
avg views ÷ 104,410 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,150
94 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.88%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
94
of 101 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held101 (31 July 202631 August 2026)
Views total389,755
Reactions total7,331
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken31 Aug 2026, 13:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7m 46s
Average length
27s

Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

7,954 reactions across 97 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3,91049.2%
🔥1,35217.0%
🥰7078.89%
custom 53101303187479266266207.79%
👍5006.29%
🎉2613.28%
😱1792.25%
😁1592.00%
😍871.09%
❤‍🔥680.855%
🤔340.427%
💯250.314%
🕊230.289%
👏110.138%
😢80.101%
🤩70.088%
🤣30.038%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 101 of the 101 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,135 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 101 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 101 we hold a reading for · 1.0%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @FitStarsClub. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 101 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 31 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
0.99%
1 of 101 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
3,830
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
4,260
over 100 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VSb5z4NPpn117 August 202617 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 101 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 31 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

31 Aug 2026, 13:27 UTC308 views7 reactionsread 31 August 2026

По мотивам видео выше: а что если правда сохранила уже 100 тренировок, а хочется только лежать? Сил нет, чтобы тренироваться. Че ж делать то? Куда деть лень и откуда взять мотивацию? Аудио-заметка от меня на эту тему печется и летит к вам ❤️

7

31 Aug 2026, 13:15 UTC607 views30 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Video

Отсняли 3 тренировки марафона и парочку рилсов. Марафон будет 🔥 14 дней: силовые, кардио, мобилити, растяжка и МФР. Конечно, будут мои любимые носочки (пробуй программу «худеем после праздников») и гантели, и гирька и резинки. Гарантирую нескучную осеннюю пору и серость только за окном 😁 Вырезанное с рекламных роликов вам несу, не вошедшее 😂 Вы когда-нибудь пробовали озвучивать рекламу? По суфлеру бежит текст, а ты

😁208🤣2

31 Aug 2026, 10:18 UTC≈1,560 views28 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

25🔥3

31 Aug 2026, 10:15 UTC≈1,580 views27 reactionsread 31 August 2026

Полезно? Продолжаем?) 🥹☺️

27

31 Aug 2026, 10:14 UTC≈1,690 views34 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

26🔥8

31 Aug 2026, 08:52 UTC≈2,170 views67 reactionsread 31 August 2026

Не пойду на йогу, потому что не гибкая и не могу как тренер. Обсудим что такое йога, зачем нужна, что рождает в теле и уме и почему нога за головой - не суть практики? ☺️ Голосовое печется, ждем ❤️

67

31 Aug 2026, 08:47 UTC≈1,920 views87 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

Очень ценно и приятно, когда йога незаметно входит в вашу жизнь ❤️ Я, кстати, впервые попав на йогу, думала это скучная фигня для бабуль и очень странных ребят, на грани с сектой 😁 Переобулась довольно быстро!

63💯14😁10

31 Aug 2026, 06:58 UTC≈2,120 views138 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

Ну что, таки вновь знакомимся!) Я Лера Буры, мне 33 года, 10 из которых я с головой и по уши в йоге, а теперь пытаюсь и вас в нее влюбить 🤍 У меня есть муж Виталик, сын Саша и две черные бестии породы цвергпинчер (рыжая на видео - подкидыш 😂 у мамы тоже пинчеры, 3 шутки, одна на время отпуска у меня). Случайные факты обо мне: 1. У меня несколько высших образований и 5 красных дипломов 😁 Коллекционер, получается!!)

122🔥16

31 Aug 2026, 06:43 UTC≈1,960 views46 reactions1 Starread 31 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🥰3212custom 53101303187479266262

31 Aug 2026, 06:38 UTC≈2,120 views49 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

37❤‍🔥9🥰3

31 Aug 2026, 06:33 UTC≈2,160 views21 reactionsread 31 August 2026

Про мотивацию начать делать зарядки, куда их вставить, есть или не есть до зарядок 👇

21

31 Aug 2026, 06:16 UTC≈2,400 views34 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Poll

Видели ли уже день тренера со мной?

  1. Да, все про вас знаю, откуда третья собака? 🧐38%
  2. Нет, только тренировки делала на платформе40%
  3. Не видела и тренировки еще не делала23%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24😁4😍3custom 53101303187479266262🤣1

Showing the 12 most recent of 101 posts we hold for @FitStarsClub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@FitStarsClub edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
16 August 2026
Most recent edit
16 August 2026

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

31 Aug 2026, 06:16 UTCAnonymous Poll229 voters

Видели ли уже день тренера со мной?

  1. Да, все про вас знаю, откуда третья собака? 🧐38%
  2. Нет, только тренировки делала на платформе40%
  3. Не видела и тренировки еще не делала23%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTCAnonymous Poll693 voters

Если бы старт был уже завтра, куда бы ты записалась первой?

  1. Продольный шпагат!15%
  2. Силовые на всё тело!61%
  3. А можно оба? Я всё вывезу19%
  4. Ни то ни другое — напишу свой вариант в комментариях5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Aug 2026, 09:40 UTCAnonymous Poll205 voters

Как сейчас открываются ссылки?

  1. 🟢 Всё работает, перехожу без проблем72%
  2. 🟡 Открываются, но не всегда / через раз19%
  3. 🔴 Всё ещё не могу перейти по ссылкам8%
  4. 👀 Раньше были проблемы, сейчас всё работает0%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 101 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 31 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 211,485 of 1,629,452 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

FitStars: Фитнес по науке
@FitStars_Media · 18,672
#1
Dietology.live🍏
@dietologylive · 3,105
#2
PRO.BEAUTY CLUB
@vsebudet4fresh · 10,997
#3
ИЛЬ ДЕ БОТЭ
@iledebeaute_ru · 47,962
#4
VitaMeal. Время для жизни
@vitameal_brand · 93,057
#5
FitStars_Q/A
@fitstars · 1,502
#6
Третьякова, дневник!
@tretyakova_stories · 771
#7
ТМ ТРАДИЦИЯ Готовить с любовью!
@tradiciya_posuda · 6,521
#8
SKINJESTIQUE
@skinjestique · 10,299
#9
Катана Капитана
@captainskatana · 11,948
#10
BABOR | Профессиональная косметика
@baborru · 10,254
#11
MIXIT.RU
@mixit_mood · 557,475
#12
NewBeautyBox | Праздник красоты
@new_beautyboxru · 14,663
#13
LiveLib | Лайвлиб
@livelib_official · 30,544
#14
Astra Make-Up Russia
@astramakeup_russia · 2,877
#15
GamersHub
@gamershubrus · 32,709
#16
БОМБОРА 🌊 Книги, акции и океан интересного
@bombora · 55,488
#17
Blue Sleep: сообщество про сон и качество жизни
@bluesleep_ru · 11,459
#18
Только то, что нужно твоей коже
@librederm · 11,463
#19
LEBO Coffee
@LEBOcoffee · 12,777
#20
На лицо | Pharmacosmetica.ru
@pharmacosmetica_ru · 23,837
#21
Косметика ARAVIA Laboratories🤍
@aravialaboratories · 18,057
#22
Литрес
@LitRes_ebooks · 53,979
#23
LUDING
@luding_official · 15,936
#24
Кантата | Чай, кофе, десерты
@cantata_ru · 22,603
#25
Divage
@divagerussia · 25,942
#26
lamoda на связи
@lamoda_na_svyazi · 44,921
#27

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

FitКатики
@FitKatiki · 55,347
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 23 August 2026
Food.ru | Рецепты и советы
@foodrumedia · 152,654
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 28 here — alongside 27 others — read 12 August 2026
СЕКЦИЯ
@sportmaster_style · 67,423
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 24 August 2026
MIXIT.RU
@mixit_mood · 557,475
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 22 here — alongside 21 others — read 12 August 2026
Елена Mixit
@ElenaMixit · 529,968
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 23 here — alongside 22 others — read 25 August 2026
Поладим с LADA
@lada_rf · 56,457
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 23 August 2026
Катя | Дом соломинки 💚
@spottykit · 158,485
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 18 August 2026
Магеря Чистка
@mageryachistka · 156,876
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“FitStars💪 домашние тренировки” (@FitStarsClub), 104,410 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FitStarsClub.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.