Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 44 days, net +4,600. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,920–16,907 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 04:18
16,216
+454
16 Sept 2026, 17:40
15,762
+277
14 Sept 2026, 18:56
15,485
+71
13 Sept 2026, 03:16
15,414
+171
11 Sept 2026, 03:42
15,243
+275
8 Sept 2026, 03:19
14,968
+330
5 Sept 2026, 03:02
14,638
+176
3 Sept 2026, 06:17
14,462
+107
2 Sept 2026, 04:24
14,355
+92
1 Sept 2026, 04:14
14,263
+85
31 Aug 2026, 05:28
14,178
+141
30 Aug 2026, 03:23
14,037
+134
29 Aug 2026, 04:28
13,903
+130
28 Aug 2026, 05:24
13,773
+247
27 Aug 2026, 03:04
13,526
+72
26 Aug 2026, 00:22
13,454
+111
24 Aug 2026, 23:34
13,343
+486
23 Aug 2026, 06:57
12,857
+148
21 Aug 2026, 17:46
12,709
+19
20 Aug 2026, 12:16
12,690
first reading
Engagement
143 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.83%
avg views ÷ 16,216 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,430
50 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.658%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
50
of 143 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
143 (3 August 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
71,617
Reactions total
471
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 18:38 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
31m 51s
Average length
1m 02s
Measured directly from 31 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,032 reactions across 135 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
201
19.5%
❤
185
17.9%
🔥
156
15.1%
👀
125
12.1%
❤🔥
93
9.01%
👍
84
8.14%
🎉
50
4.84%
😍
34
3.29%
💯
32
3.10%
🤡
17
1.65%
😢
9
0.872%
🥰
8
0.775%
🌚
7
0.678%
😱
7
0.678%
🤝
7
0.678%
🍾
4
0.388%
👎
4
0.388%
💔
4
0.388%
😈
2
0.194%
🤔
2
0.194%
1 further kind
1
0.097%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 143 of the 143 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,081 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 143 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
0.699%
1 of 143 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
1,920
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
544
over 142 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFGUnoVT
1
24 August 2026
24 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 143 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
До НРФ Регионы осталось 16 дней. Рассказываем, что ждет участников
18 сентября на форуме обсудим, что меняется на рынке и как это влияет на работу специалистов.
В Новом корпусе спикеры поговорят о трендах и изменениях на рынке, а в Историческом участники смогут разобрать реальные кейсы и попробовать инструменты на практике.
➡️ Что будет в Новом корпусе
Спикеры обсудят выход брендов на новые цифровые платформы, изме…
Рекламисты России и Кыргызстана договорились сотрудничать
Ассоциация коммуникационных агентств России (АКАР) и Кыргызская маркетинговая ассоциация (КМА) заключили соглашение о сотрудничестве на заседании Координационного совета по рекламе при межгосударственном совете по антимонопольной политике в Нижнем Новгороде. Документ подписали президент АКАР Сергей Пискарев и председатель координационного совета КМА Айдай Мок…
Что русскому медведь с матрешкой, то американцу белоголовый орлан и Белый дом
Больше половины россиян (59%), опрошенных ВЦИОМ, считают символом современной России классиков литературы — Пушкина, Толстого, Достоевского. Второе и третье место у архитектурных символов — Собора Василия Блаженного (41%) и Большого театра (40%). За медведя проголосовали 37% опрошенных, за автомат Калашникова — 35%, за атомный ледокол — 34…
Александр Жаров предложил аналог Российского авторского общества для медиакомпаний
Урегулирование вопроса использования контента для обучения нейросетей, по оценке гендиректора «Газпром-Медиа Холдинга» Александра Жарова, займет до двух лет.
На ВЭФ-2026 он заявил, что проблема баланса между авторскими правами медиа и интересами разработчиков ИИ очень сложная: технически проверить, какой именно контент повлиял на обу…
Александр Иванов перешел из Easy Media в NMi Group
Бывший топ-менеджер медиаагентства Easy Media (группа OMD) вышел на работу в NMi Group, рассказали ADPASS два собеседника в рекламных агентствах. В пресс-службе NMi Group подтвердили эту информацию: с 17 августа Александр Иванов занял должность заместителя генерального директора по цифровым технологиям и рекламе вне дома (ООН).
В агентство Easy Media Александр Иван…
Чатботам предложили сникерснуть
«Сникерсу» мало людей, которым он уже 16 лет внушает, что «Ты — это не ты, когда голоден», теперь он убеждает чатботы, что вредным батончиком можно утолять голод.
Оказывается, глюки искусственного интеллекта вызваны тем, что он голоден. Чтобы заморить искусственного червячка Snickers вывел Hungr.AI, цифровой батончик, приводящий поехавший ИИ в себя. Пользователи могут скопировать его…
Live-контент на Rutube становится популярнее
Авторские стримы и трансляции на Rutube значительно выросли к прошлому году, рассказал на ВЭФ глава цифровых активов «Газпром-Медиа Холдинга» Сергей Косинский.
Стримы
Во II квартале среднее число одновременных зрителей стримов увеличилось на 84% год к году. Средняя продолжительность одной трансляции составила 110 минут. Больше всего времени зрители провели за спортивными…
🎁 Разыгрываем 3 приглашения на встречу Экспертного клуба НРФ × НТВ
На индустриальной встрече «ТВ + Digital: конкуренция закончилась. Что дальше?» обсудят, как меняются медиапотребление, измерения и рекламные продукты на стыке ТВ и Digital и какие возможности это открывает для рынка.
В дискуссии примут участие представители телеканалов, digital-платформ, рекламного рынка и брендов, в том числе Тимур Вайнштейн, генер…
Rutube запустит монетизацию коротких вертикальных видео в этом году
Короткие видео на Rutube станут приоритетным направлением видеосервиса во второй половине года, сообщил представитель компании в рамках Восточного экономического форума.
Главное: авторы вертикалок смогут монетизировать свой контент. Это должно расширить ряды коротокоформатников, сейчас их около 40 тыс. на платформе. Их доход будет напрямую зависеть…
Цифровая медиаинфляция притормозила
Во втором квартале 2026 года рост стоимости цифровой рекламы в России заметно замедлился: цена клика (CPC) выросла всего на 0,8% год к году, а стоимость целевого действия (CPA) увеличилась на 6,4%. В квартальном сравнении CPC прибавил 4,9%, а CPA, напротив, снизился на 3,6%.
Такие данные приводит E-Promo Group в исследовании медиаинфляции в performance-каналах. Аналитики изучили …
НРФ’10 становится компактнее и при этом сохраняет главное🔥
Юбилейный НРФ пройдет с 10 по 12 ноября. Мы пересобрали программу так, чтобы за три дня собрать максимум актуальных тем, экспертизы и практических решений для участников.
Каждый день программы отвечает на свой вопрос:
📅 ноября — Тренды и инновации.
Что происходит с медиасредой, потребителем и брендами и какие изменения будут определять рынок завтра?
📅 ноябр…
❤6❤🔥4🔥4
Showing the 12 most recent of 143 posts we hold for @adpass_media. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@adpass_media edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
20 August 2026
Most recent edit
24 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 36 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Постмаркетинг @pstmarketing · 66,351 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 21 August 2026
Sostav @sostav · 56,006 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 23 August 2026
AdIndex @adindex · 30,241 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 7 September 2026
Маркировка и налог на рекламу: главные новости (ЕРИР) @adv_system · 30,080 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 7 September 2026
Полезный Парфун @ParfunA · 21,948 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 22 September 2026
ХОТ ДИДЖИТАЛ от Влада Ситникова @HotDigital · 23,545 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 18 September 2026
СберМаркетинг @sbermarketing · 199,027 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
гура́ @creativeee · 61,473 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 21 August 2026
Нильсен @nielsenrussia · 33,665 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 4 September 2026
ФАС России | FAS Russia @fasrussia · 33,808 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 4 September 2026
Больше джобсов @morejobs · 83,804 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 18 August 2026
Бонни и Слайд @bonnieandslide · 24,676 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 15 September 2026
WOW Реклама | Маркетинг @wowadvertise · 28,421 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ADPASS” (@adpass_media), 16,216 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/adpass_media.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.