Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
30 measurements spanning 40 days, net +60. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,482–14,561 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 16:41
14,552
+15
14 Sept 2026, 04:15
14,537
-2
12 Sept 2026, 09:56
14,539
+3
10 Sept 2026, 05:59
14,536
+9
6 Sept 2026, 21:37
14,527
+1
4 Sept 2026, 08:01
14,526
+4
2 Sept 2026, 19:14
14,522
-6
1 Sept 2026, 21:13
14,528
+3
30 Aug 2026, 21:17
14,525
-1
29 Aug 2026, 17:57
14,526
-2
28 Aug 2026, 15:43
14,528
-3
27 Aug 2026, 16:33
14,531
+2
25 Aug 2026, 15:33
14,529
+8
24 Aug 2026, 15:36
14,521
-1
22 Aug 2026, 22:13
14,522
-2
21 Aug 2026, 08:57
14,524
+2
20 Aug 2026, 09:16
14,522
-1
19 Aug 2026, 11:56
14,523
+7
18 Aug 2026, 10:43
14,516
-3
17 Aug 2026, 10:08
14,519
first reading
Engagement
132 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.27%
avg views ÷ 14,552 subscribers
Avg views / post
476
75 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.513%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
75
of 132 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 44 of 75 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
132 (2 August 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
35,737
Reactions total
109
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 18:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
6m 08s
Average length
1m 14s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
177 reactions across 68 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
125
70.6%
🔥
21
11.9%
👍
16
9.04%
custom 5364279535544075549
15
8.47%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 74 of the 132 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 178 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 132 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
53.8%
71 of 132 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
71
posts carrying an erid · 41 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
499
over 71 measured posts
Median views · rest
509
over 61 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2Vfnxvx8qnj
4
5 August 2026
28 August 2026
2VfnxyYERLX
4
4 August 2026
18 August 2026
2VfnxvhQenf
3
6 August 2026
24 August 2026
2Vfnxw8tJhh
3
9 August 2026
24 August 2026
2Vfnxwvf9jZ
3
5 August 2026
16 August 2026
2VfnxxpGufq
3
8 August 2026
26 August 2026
2VfnxvHyir7
2
9 August 2026
28 August 2026
2VfnxvJq8AF
2
19 August 2026
27 August 2026
2VfnxvtwTQf
2
7 August 2026
31 August 2026
2VfnxwAT2Aw
2
19 August 2026
28 August 2026
2VfnxwCqh1u
2
16 August 2026
1 September 2026
2VfnxwS5b1D
2
19 August 2026
29 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it. 29 further tokens are held for this entry and not listed here.
Measured over the 132 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Как достигнуть целей клиента и отстроить от целей терапии? Узнайте на тренинге преподавателя Ассоциации когнитивно-поведенческой психотерапии, сертифицированного Институтом Бека! Старт 7 сентября 📣
Если вы хотите повысить свой профессиональный уровень в определении клиентских запросов, анализе и оценке эффективности психологического консультирования, ждём вас на ТТиН «Формулирование проблем и постановка целей терапи…
Дорогие коллеги! Приглашаем вас на нашу традиционную встречу в начале сентября, посвященную дню знаний!
В этом году мы предлагаем вам вместе с нашими преподавателями и специалистами порассуждать на тему терапевтических отношений в эпоху искусственного интеллекта.
Искусственный интеллект уже умеет объяснять когнитивные искажения, предлагать техники самопомощи, формулировать вопросы, составлять дневники мыслей и помо…
Хроническая боль: как КПТ помогает вернуть человеку активность и качество жизни
Хроническая боль влияет не только на физическое самочувствие. Она может усиливать тревогу, подавленность, катастрофические мысли, избегание активности и ощущение беспомощности. Когнитивно-поведенческая терапия не обещает устранить медицинскую причину боли, но помогает человеку уменьшить связанные с ней страдания, расширить повседневную а…
Хотите начать терапевтическую практику с парами в когнитивно-поведенческом подходе?
Приглашаем вас на уникальный курс “Когнитивно-поведенческая терапия пар”, новый поток которого стартует 26 сентября в онлайн-формате.
На курсе вы научитесь:
▫️Выстраивать терапевтические отношения с парой с учётом основных принципов семейной терапии: нейтральность, циркулярность и гипотетичность;
▫️Проводить работу со специфическими…
Вы готовы вывести свои знания и навыки в когнитивно-поведенческой терапии на новый уровень мастерства?
📣 Знакомьтесь с нашим Супервизионным курсом КПТ и не упустите уникальную возможность перейти на следующую ступень профессионального развития под руководством экспертов Ассоциации КПП!
Приглашаем к участию специалистов, освоивших Базовый и Продвинутый курсы КПТ. Супервизионный курс - это третья ступень в программе …
Уважаемые коллеги, знакомим вас с расписанием на сентябрь 2026 года:
7 сентября 2026 года стартует курс «Терапия принятия и ответственности (АСТ)»
Регистрация: https://promo.cbt.university/act?utm_source=tg
С 7 по сентября по 5 октября пройдет тренинг техник и навыков «Формулирование проблем и постановка целей терапии»
Регистрация: https://promo.cbt.university/fp_terapy/?utm_source=tg
С 9 сентября по 7 октября зап…
В рамках сотрудничества с Институтом Бека у Ассоциации есть возможность предоставлять обучение в самых разных форматах
С 14 по 22 сентября пройдет онлайн семинар Института Бека Когнитивно-поведенческая терапия хронической боли
Проведет семинар София Чернофф - доктор психологии, магистр медицинских наук, является клиническим медицинским психологом, педагогом и супервизором, курирует учебные программы и клиническую п…
С 9 сентября по 7 октября пройдет тематический тренинг развития техник и навыков КПТ (ТТиН) на тему «Построение терапевтических отношений и рабочего альянса. Общие и специфические навыки специалиста».
Общие и специфические навыки психолога имеют ключевое значение для проведения эффективного психотерапевтического процесса и каждой отдельной сессии, в том числе построения терапевтических отношений и формирования рабо…
Уважаемые коллеги!
От имени Ассоциации когнитивно-поведенческой психотерапии поздравляем вас с Днём знаний.
Этот праздник символизирует постоянное профессиональное развитие, которое лежит в основе нашей деятельности. Мы продолжаем осваивать новые подходы, углублять понимание клинических феноменов и совершенствовать терапевтические навыки, чтобы соответствовать высоким стандартам доказательной практики.
Желаем вам …
❤️ Коллеги, август подходит к концу, и мы готовимся к осеннему сезону — с новыми мыслями, новыми знакомствами и, надеемся, с ощущением, что лето прошло не зря.
Давайте вместе вспомним три последних месяца.
✒️ В этом году мы впервые провели сразу два очных обучения с профессором Уинди Драйденом — первым британцем, получившим аккредитацию Института Альберта Эллиса, учеником Эллиса, Бека и Лазаруса, почётным профессор…
Познакомьтесь с программой курса “Терапия принятия и ответственности (ACT)”
Теоретические основы ACT (теория реляционных фреймов, функциональный контекстуализм, трансдиагностическая модель психологической гибкости (шесть основных процессов ACT: принятие, выбор ценностей, присутствие в моменте, мотивированное поведение, селф-как-контекст, когнитивное распутывание);
Модель развития и поддержания психических расстройст…
Коллеги, представляем вам цикл лекций из программы профессиональной переподготовки «Клиническая психология», который пройдет в сентябре 2026 года.
Дисциплина "Основы клинико-психологической диагностики" пройдет 11-13 сентября 2026 года.
Слушатели смогут узнать о:
1) основные понятия, термины и положения психологической диагностики;
2) содержание этических принципов работы психолога;
3) теоретические основы психологи…
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 132 posts we hold for @associationcbt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@associationcbt edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
27 August 2026
Most recent edit
27 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Открытые курсы СПб ИДПО для психологов и психотерапевтов @spb_idpo · 27,598 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 September 2026
Психология | Psychologies @PsychologiesRussia · 53,728 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 24 August 2026
Инпсихо | Медиа Московского Института Психоанализа @Inpsycho · 31,386 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 6 September 2026
̶Д̶о̶к̶т̶о̶р̶ Андрей Курпатов @kurpatov_tg · 71,209 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 August 2026
Василиса Бутусова @stillvasilisa · 24,535 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 September 2026
Алексей Красиков®️️️🍀 @krasikovAlexey · 41,210 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 29 August 2026
Дубынин о мозге 🧠 @dubininvaofficial · 44,254 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 28 August 2026
Чистые Когниции @pure_cognitions · 37,799 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 31 August 2026
Психотерапевт Прибытков @pribytkov_psy · 40,045 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 30 August 2026
«СУТЬ ВЕЩЕЙ» | Центр интеллектуальных практик Андрея Курпатова @myshlenie_kurpatov · 43,341 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 28 August 2026
Институт психологии Life Practic @psypractic_ru · 33,146 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 4 September 2026
Анетта Орлова | Философия жизни @anettaorlova · 40,462 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 4 September 2026
Где моё внимание? @pure_cognitions_adhd · 27,385 Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 September 2026
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ассоциация Когнитивно-Поведенческой Психотерапии” (@associationcbt), 14,552 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/associationcbt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.