Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for HR с амбициями

Channel

HR с амбициями

@hr_with_ambitions

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,290subscribers

-80 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001166151840
TypeChannel
Username@hr_with_ambitions
DescriptionРедакции журнала «Директор по персоналу» и сайта hr-director.ru делятся несерьёзными новостями и HR-фишками. Регистрация РКН: https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/69b2871a3cb73616cfeb86a6 👉🏼 Реклама: @polarightt
Created30 March 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held58
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/hr_with_ambitions

Topic

Job listings — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

12,29012,45312,371.56 August 2026 — 12,370 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,368 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,366 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,365 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,366 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,369 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,401 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,415 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,411 subscribers15 August 2026 — 12,420 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,418 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,416 subscribers22 August 2026 — 12,419 subscribers23 August 2026 — 12,415 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,410 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,416 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,415 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,417 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,419 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,421 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,420 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,418 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,415 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,409 subscribers5 September 2026 — 12,439 subscribers8 September 2026 — 12,431 subscribers11 September 2026 — 12,446 subscribers13 September 2026 — 12,453 subscribers14 September 2026 — 12,447 subscribers16 September 2026 — 12,440 subscribers19 September 2026 — 12,425 subscribers25 September 2026 — 12,405 subscribers4 October 2026 — 12,372 subscribers8 October 2026 — 12,361 subscribers13 October 2026 — 12,383 subscribers14 October 2026 — 12,376 subscribers15 October 2026 — 12,367 subscribers16 October 2026 — 12,368 subscribers17 October 2026 — 12,370 subscribers19 October 2026 — 12,365 subscribers20 October 2026 — 12,358 subscribers21 October 2026 — 12,350 subscribers23 October 2026 — 12,349 subscribers24 October 2026 — 12,346 subscribers25 October 2026 — 12,347 subscribers26 October 2026 — 12,344 subscribers27 October 2026 — 12,337 subscribers28 October 2026 — 12,333 subscribers29 October 2026 — 12,327 subscribers30 October 2026 — 12,323 subscribers31 October 2026 — 12,320 subscribers1 November 2026 — 12,316 subscribers2 November 2026 — 12,313 subscribers3 November 2026 — 12,311 subscribers4 November 2026 — 12,304 subscribers5 November 2026 — 12,299 subscribers6 November 2026 — 12,297 subscribers7 November 2026 — 12,290 subscribers6 August 20267 November 2026
58 measurements spanning 94 days, net -80. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,266–12,477 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 18:3112,290-7
6 Nov 2026, 19:1612,297-2
5 Nov 2026, 16:4612,299-5
4 Nov 2026, 15:0612,304-7
3 Nov 2026, 16:5612,311-2
2 Nov 2026, 19:0912,313-3
1 Nov 2026, 16:0512,316-4
31 Oct 2026, 16:3712,320-3
30 Oct 2026, 18:2112,323-4
29 Oct 2026, 19:5012,327-6
28 Oct 2026, 20:2112,333-4
27 Oct 2026, 18:1712,337-7
26 Oct 2026, 21:2712,344-3
25 Oct 2026, 18:0712,347+1
24 Oct 2026, 19:1712,346-3
23 Oct 2026, 16:2812,349-1
21 Oct 2026, 16:5612,350-8
20 Oct 2026, 12:4112,358-7
19 Oct 2026, 10:0412,365-5
17 Oct 2026, 13:4512,370first reading

Engagement

112 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.60%
avg views ÷ 12,290 subscribers
Avg views / post
319
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.25%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 112 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 28 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held112 (29 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total8,942
Reactions total45
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 07:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,020
Videos
≈122
Links
≈3,580

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
13m 45s
Average length
55s

Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

93 reactions across 33 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤5255.9%
👍1718.3%
🔥1111.8%
💯55.38%
🤔33.23%
🎉22.15%
❤‍🔥11.08%
👏11.08%
😱11.08%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 112 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 99 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 112 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 29 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 12:05 UTC230 viewsread 8 November 2026
Photo

«Зачем нанимать сотрудника, если скоро его работу будет выполнять ИИ?» Из-за такой логики компании рискуют потерять больше, чем сэкономить. Согласно прогнозу, основанному на опросе 2778 исследователей, к 2047 году существует 50-процентная вероятность, что искусственный интеллект превзойдет человека во всех задачах. А полную автоматизацию всех профессий исследователи прогнозируют значительно позже — к 2116 году. Но…

6 Nov 2026, 10:15 UTC218 views3 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Forwarded from @hrglavred

Наткнулся на эксперта в запрещенке. Он про менеджмент, управление людьми. Вроде говорит вещи, которые отзываются, но делает это так токсично и хамски, что фу. Подумал, что это как раз тот случай, когда тема огонь, а подача выбрана не очень. Хотя, в соцсетях токсиков любят и дают им охваты... Вообще, я давно наблюдаю за тем, как HR-ы строят личный бренд. Если коротко, то сначала эксперты просто хорошо делаешь свою ра…

❤2❤‍🔥1

6 Nov 2026, 09:02 UTC243 viewsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Сотрудник решил уволиться. А что, если руководитель сможет заранее отрепетировать разговор с ним? Вместо обычного тренинга или разбора теории можно предложить руководителю поговорить с виртуальным сотрудником. Он будет отвечать на вопросы, реагировать на реплики и менять ход диалога в зависимости от слов собеседника. 🗣️ В ноябрьском номере журнала «Директор по персоналу» Екатерина Лежнева, автор и преподаватель кур…

5 Nov 2026, 12:04 UTC260 views5 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

«Пока сотрудникам не выплатили зарплату, руководство останется без премий» ⚡ Депутаты хотят запретить компаниям выплачивать премии топ-менеджерам, если перед рядовыми сотрудниками накопились долги по зарплате. Согласно инициативе, ограничения будут действовать, если работодатель задерживает зарплату более чем на один месяц. Кого предлагают оставить без премий? ⚪️ Генерального директора. ⚪️ Заместителей руководите…

❤3👍2

5 Nov 2026, 09:00 UTC240 viewsread 8 November 2026
Photo

💬 «Самое трудное — преодолеть нежелание людей работать по-другому» Почему кадровый дефицит уже не главная проблема HR? Как преодолеть сопротивление сотрудников изменениям и перестать внедрять новые инструменты только потому, что так делают все? 🗣️ Мария Болкунова, директор по персоналу ГК «Дамате», рассказала, как за 20 лет прошла путь от рекрутера до HRD, почему считает результат бизнеса главным ориентиром HR и ка…

5 Nov 2026, 06:00 UTC273 viewsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Вложение, которое окупается первым же материалом Подписка на журнал «Директор по персоналу» со скидкой 70% — это рабочий инструмент для HR за разумные деньги. Давайте честно: 14 990 рублей за год — это не трата. Особенно в рамках бюджета компании. 💡 Один разбор сложной ситуации из журнала может сэкономить вам дни, недели, месяцы работы. Один актуальный алгоритм — уберечь от ошибки. Один инсайт — помочь принять верн…

4 Nov 2026, 09:01 UTC287 views4 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Поздравляем с Днем народного единства! 🇷🇺 Желаем согласия, добрых людей рядом, спокойствия и уверенности в будущем. Пусть нас всегда объединяет то, что действительно важно ❤️

🎉2👍2

3 Nov 2026, 12:03 UTC321 views6 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

🍂 Осенняя хандра мешает работать каждому третьему россиянину Снижение концентрации, усталость, раздражительность и нежелание браться за задачи — осенью с такими состояниями сталкиваются многие сотрудники. И это уже влияет на рабочие результаты. Более 33% россиян испытывают проблемы на работе на фоне сезонного ухудшения настроения: ➡️ 41% отмечают осеннее ухудшение настроения и упадок сил. ➡️ 65% ничего не предпри…

❤3👍2🤔1

3 Nov 2026, 09:04 UTC301 viewsread 8 November 2026

ИИ предложил уволить сотрудника из-за низких показателей. Но что, если алгоритм ошибается? Компании все чаще используют искусственный интеллект для оценки эффективности персонала. Нейросети анализируют KPI, сравнивают результаты и помогают выявлять слабые места в работе команды. Однако есть проблема: алгоритм видит только те данные, которые в него загрузили. А реальный вклад сотрудника может оказаться гораздо шире.…

3 Nov 2026, 06:03 UTC308 viewsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Цена на «Директор по персоналу» В НОЯБРЕ не кусается 🔊 Годовая ВИП-подписка на журнал «Директор по персоналу» — всего 14 990 ₽. Вместо 49 104 ₽. Скидка 70% только в ноябре. За 41 рубль в день вы получаете доступ к базе управленческих кейсов, готовым системам мотивации, алгоритмам адаптации и разборам сложных ситуаций с персоналом. И целый год не тратите свои ресурсы на исправление ошибок или разработку HR-процессов…

2 Nov 2026, 12:02 UTC296 views3 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

👥 Сотрудники перегружены, задачи копятся, сроки срываются. Пора расширять штат? Не всегда! Иногда проблема не в количестве людей, а в том, как распределена работа. Если нанять еще нескольких специалистов в команду с неэффективной структурой, можно получить те же трудности, только в большем масштабе. В ноябрьском номере журнала «Директор по персоналу» Елена Сурикова, руководитель направления Customer Success в Solar…

❤3

Showing the 12 most recent of 112 posts we hold for @hr_with_ambitions. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 6 posts on @hr_with_ambitions as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
7 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
27 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Зайдите в кадры!
@kadrovoedelojournal · 30,642
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 6 September 2026
Кадровику
@kadroviku · 44,906
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 27 August 2026
HR[хаб]вакансии
@hrhubvacancy · 22,874
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 20 September 2026
Эйчаргейт| Перезагрузка
@hrgate · 56,959
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 28 August 2026
Пригодится! 🍎 Библиотека для HR
@savetoreadlater · 22,083
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 21 September 2026
Полезное для Кадровика
@trud_krut · 23,338
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 September 2026
WTF_HR
@WTF_HR · 19,219
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 2 October 2026
HR-аналитика
@hranalitycs · 34,231
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 3 September 2026
topcareer
@topcareerschool · 23,198
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 18 September 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“HR с амбициями” (@hr_with_ambitions), 12,290 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hr_with_ambitions.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.