Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Psycho_pharmacologist

Channel

Psycho_pharmacologist

@psycho_pharmacologist

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,218subscribers

-39 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001787456164
TypeChannel
Username@psycho_pharmacologist
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/psycho_pharmacologist

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6,2186,2576,237.56 August 2026 — 6,257 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,257 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,253 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,254 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,252 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,246 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,240 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,244 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,240 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,241 subscribers7 September 2026 — 6,233 subscribers11 September 2026 — 6,224 subscribers14 September 2026 — 6,227 subscribers18 September 2026 — 6,218 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 44 days, net -39. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,212–6,263 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 19:186,218-9
14 Sept 2026, 19:386,227+3
11 Sept 2026, 16:156,224-9
7 Sept 2026, 01:426,233-8
2 Sept 2026, 02:556,241+1
29 Aug 2026, 21:046,240-4
26 Aug 2026, 14:586,244+4
23 Aug 2026, 10:086,240-6
19 Aug 2026, 17:446,246-6
16 Aug 2026, 17:096,252-2
12 Aug 2026, 21:536,254+1
9 Aug 2026, 14:166,253-4
6 Aug 2026, 03:216,257no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:186,257first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 12 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

889 reactions across 16 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
62270.0%
🔥12213.7%
🎉546.07%
👍374.16%
😁141.57%
💯131.46%
🥴91.01%
💔60.675%
🙏50.562%
👏30.337%
💊20.225%
🤣10.112%
🥰10.112%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 889 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @psycho_pharmacologist. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 June 2026 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 10:24 UTC876 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

А если хотите проверить себя, насколько в пределах нормы или нет ваша дневная сонливость, то вот шкала специально для этого)

👍51

3 Aug 2026, 10:23 UTC743 viewsread 12 August 2026

Пока сама сгенерировать посты не могу, делюсь классным постом нашего врача-сомнолога Ирины Галеевой на тему длительного сна)

3 Aug 2026, 10:23 UTC820 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @handlingbettercenterPhoto

Спать больше 10 часов вредно? Почему это может быть признаком опасной проблемы со здоровьем, рассказывает невролог и сомнолог Ирина Галеева. Есть популярное мнение, что чем больше сна, тем лучше. Многие даже гордятся своей способностью долго спать. Но, к сожалению, научные данные показывают, что сон более 10 часов в сутки ассоциирован с повышенным риском смертности (примерно на 34–48%). Крупные метаанализы демонст

👍5🔥1

31 Jul 2026, 06:31 UTC≈1,210 views60 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Всегда ли нужен самый дорогой психиатр? Мне кажется, один из самых частых вопросов, который возникает у пациентов при выборе врача: «А почему один психиатр стоит 5000 рублей, а другой 15000?» И если честно, это очень правильный вопрос. Потому что со стороны действительно непонятно. Один врач лучше другого? Более умный? Или просто более известный? Я сама регулярно оказываюсь в роли пациента соматического звена и за

47💯5🔥5👍2🥴1

29 Jul 2026, 16:05 UTC929 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Круглый стол тут организовали с коллегами на интересную и местами неоднозначную тему Предназначен в первую очередь для специалистов в области психического здоровья Так что регистрируйтесь и присоединяйтесь, подискутируем от души))

5👏3👍2

29 Jul 2026, 16:05 UTC≈1,160 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @psypedia_orgPhoto

😍Круглый стол «Почему клиенту становится хуже: закономерное обострение, неверно выбранная стратегия или границы компетенций терапевта». 4 августа, 20:00 MSK онлайн, Zoom участие бесплатное Приглашенные специалисты: Елизавета Федорова - врач-психиатр, КБТ-терапевт, главный врач психоневрологической клиники «Справиться Проще», соавтор клинических рекомендаций по биполярному расстройству Минздрава РФ от 2019 года. Д

10🔥5🙏5👍1

28 Jul 2026, 15:59 UTC≈1,180 views69 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Режим многозадачности За последний год, с появлением новых должностей и в целом довольно интенсивным карьерным треком, я утонула в многозадачности. После почти трех недель отпуска мозг успел хорошо разгрузиться. Но, как оказалось, чтобы загрузить его обратно, хватило буквально пары насыщенных рабочих дней 😅 В рамках темпа последнего года я очень много думала про оптимизацию процессов и как жить эту жизнь, когда жи

47🔥16💯6

24 Jul 2026, 16:03 UTC≈1,680 views42 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Когда тревога — это нормально, а когда уже пора лечить? Один из самых частых вопросов, который мне задают на приеме: «У меня тревожное расстройство, да? Раз я так много тревожусь?» И здесь сразу хочется написать важный дисклеймер. Тревога сама по себе не является симптомом психического расстройства. Это нормальная человеческая эмоция. Более того, если бы мы вообще не испытывали тревогу, то, скорее всего, как вид

42

24 Jul 2026, 08:21 UTC≈1,590 views64 reactionsread 12 August 2026

ИИ тут сделал мне новую аватарку для канала Очень уж захотелось увидеть Морти в белом халате 😅 Вообще, конечно, забавно, что ИИ до сих пор представляет психиатров именно в халатах. Хотя за всю мою практику халат я носила только в НИИ психиатрии. В частной психиатрии от них чаще отказываются, в том числе чтобы снижать уровень стигматизации и делать общение с врачом менее формальным. Так как из НИИ я ушла уже достат

🔥2918😁14🥴3

26 Jun 2026, 12:53 UTC≈2,550 views52 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Зачем психиатру общаться с психологом? Один из принципов работы нашей клиники заключается в том, что психиатр и психолог не должны существовать в параллельных вселенных, если работают с одним и тем же человеком. Психиатр видит одну часть картины. Психолог видит другую. Психиатр может рассказать о диагностическом поиске, динамике симптомов, назначенном лечении и реакции на препараты. Психолог, в свою очередь, часто

42💔6💊2💯2

24 Jun 2026, 06:12 UTC≈2,000 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @albatroscenter

Продолжаем делиться записями выступлений с нашего фестиваля о гиперконтроле 🐦 Сегодня публикуем лекцию врача-психиатра Елизаветы Федоровой: «Слишком много или слишком мало? Как понять, где вы на шкале контроля и выбрать подходящую терапию» В этой лекции говорим о спектре гиперконтроля и импульсивности, сходствах и различиях между разными состояниями и о том, почему для выбора эффективной помощи важно понимать не т

20🔥4👍3🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @psycho_pharmacologist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Доктор Галеева
@doctor_galeeva · 28,614
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 9 September 2026
Доктор Сычев
@dr_sychev · 49,159
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 August 2026
Где моё внимание?
@pure_cognitions_adhd · 27,444
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 September 2026
Психотерапевт Прибытков
@pribytkov_psy · 40,070
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 30 August 2026
Чистые Когниции
@pure_cognitions · 37,817
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 31 August 2026
Василиса Бутусова
@stillvasilisa · 24,637
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 September 2026
Психиатрия & Нейронауки
@psy_and_neuro · 22,280
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 September 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Psycho_pharmacologist” (@psycho_pharmacologist), 6,218 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psycho_pharmacologist.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.