Psycho_pharmacologist pinned «Я не понимаю, как многие специалисты успевают делать контент Эту загадку я пытаюсь разгадать уже не первый год. Захожу в телеграм или запрещеннограм и вижу, как мои коллеги психиатры и психологи все клипают посты и рилсы и думаю «как вы это делаете». Вообще…»

Channel
Psycho_pharmacologist
@psycho_pharmacologist
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,199subscribers
-58 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001787456164 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @psycho_pharmacologist |
| Description | Врач-психиатр, КБТ-терапевт, хозяйка Морти Главный врач в Справиться Проще Обо мне: http://elizavetafedorova.ru |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 24 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/psycho_pharmacologist |
Topic
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 23:54 | 6,199 | -1 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 18:06 | 6,200 | -1 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 12:46 | 6,201 | -3 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 18:31 | 6,204 | -1 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 03:57 | 6,205 | +2 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 14:37 | 6,203 | -10 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 07:25 | 6,213 | +1 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 10:15 | 6,212 | -1 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 14:42 | 6,213 | -1 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 02:20 | 6,214 | -4 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 19:18 | 6,218 | -9 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 19:38 | 6,227 | +3 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 16:15 | 6,224 | -9 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 01:42 | 6,233 | -8 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 02:55 | 6,241 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 21:04 | 6,240 | -4 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 14:58 | 6,244 | +4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 10:08 | 6,240 | -6 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 17:44 | 6,246 | -6 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:09 | 6,252 | first reading |
Engagement
27 posts held, back to 12 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 16.5%
- avg views ÷ 6,199 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,020
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- 7.45%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 2
- of 27 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 27 (12 June 2026 – 16 October 2026) |
| Views total | 1,020 |
| Reactions total | 76 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 16:38 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 205
- Videos
- 13
- Links
- 248
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
1,293 reactions across 23 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 928 | 71.8% | |
| 🔥 | 144 | 11.1% | |
| 👍 | 63 | 4.87% | |
| 🎉 | 54 | 4.18% | |
| 💯 | 25 | 1.93% | |
| 😁 | 15 | 1.16% | |
| 💔 | 14 | 1.08% | |
| 🥴 | 11 | 0.851% | |
| 😭 | 7 | 0.541% | |
| 🙏 | 5 | 0.387% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 0.309% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 0.232% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 0.232% | |
| 😘 | 3 | 0.232% | |
| 🤨 | 3 | 0.232% | |
| 💊 | 2 | 0.155% | |
| 🤗 | 2 | 0.155% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 0.155% | |
| 🤷♂ | 2 | 0.155% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.077% | |
| 2 further kinds | 2 | 0.155% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,293 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 16 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 25 we hold a reading for · 4%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @psycho_pharmacologist. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 27 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 June 2026 to 16 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 2 posts held from the last 30 days (50.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Я не понимаю, как многие специалисты успевают делать контент Эту загадку я пытаюсь разгадать уже не первый год. Захожу в телеграм или запрещеннограм и вижу, как мои коллеги психиатры и психологи все клипают посты и рилсы и думаю «как вы это делаете». Вообще, вести профессиональные соц сети - это отдельный вид работы и искусства. И в недавнем времени я себе все-таки призналась, что у меня нет сил и времени на еще од…
❤68👍7😢1
Свой кусочек мира В последнее время я достаточно много думаю о том, как контекст нашей жизни влияет на наше ментальное, да и физическое здоровье. На то, как мы чувствуем себя каждый день, сколько у нас сил, тревоги, раздражения, надежды. И главное, что мы вообще можем со всем этим сделать. То, что происходит вокруг нас на макро и микроуровне, действительно нельзя просто игнорировать. Это вполне укладывается и в био…
❤42💔8🤨3👍2🤝2🤷♂2😭1
Моя стоматологическая ачивка года Вот и пришла осень, а вместе с ней у меня почему-то включился режим подведения итогов года. 2026 год оказался довольно сложным и морально, и физически, поэтому сейчас, когда мозг начинает перебирать события последних месяцев и искать в них что-то хорошее, список достижений получается не таким уж длинным)) Но одна вещь точно попадает в него. В свои 33 года я наконец сделала всё, что…
❤15👍5🥴2
Многозадачность, которую я не ожидала Когда я соглашалась на позицию главного врача, я совсем не ожидала, что мой фокус внимания должен будет быть погружен в такое количество разных областей работы клиники 😅 Попросила ChatGPT сделать на эту тему картинку, и, так как он теперь помнит наши обсуждения из других чатов, довольно точно показал, как я себя чувствую все эти месяцы с новой ответственностью, которую на себя …
❤32💯7😭6🤗2
Общий язык психиатров и психологов Одной из своих профессиональных целей я считаю продолжать транслировать мысль о том, что работа психиатра и психолога в команде увеличивает вероятность действительно хорошо помочь клиенту. Но довольно часто, в том числе внутри своей команды, я слышу от специалистов: «А о чем нам вообще говорить?» Лично меня этот вопрос долгое время вводил в ступор. В смысле о чем? О пациенте. О …
❤24👎4😘3
Депрессия: база У нас часто в рабочих и дружеских разговорах с коллегами возникает ощущение, что все и так прекрасно знают основы тех или иных расстройств. В частности, депрессии. А потом мы сталкиваемся с реальным миром. С нашими клиентами на приемах, а еще с теми, кто до приема пока не дошел, но уже испытывает страдания и пытается разобраться, что с ним происходит. И оказывается, что базовые вопросы все еще оста…
❤37🔥7👍4
Когда кажется, что вокруг все плохо Мне кажется, в сложные периоды очень легко попасть в состояние, когда начинает казаться, что вокруг вообще ничего хорошего не осталось Люди злые, новости ужасные, все странно, будущее непонятное, а хорошего будто бы становится все меньше И на этом фоне довольно легко провалиться в ощущение безнадежности Я заметила, что в такие моменты мне помогает смотреть на людей, которые нес…
❤59🔥7
А если хотите проверить себя, насколько в пределах нормы или нет ваша дневная сонливость, то вот шкала специально для этого)
👍7❤3🕊2
Спать больше 10 часов вредно? Почему это может быть признаком опасной проблемы со здоровьем, рассказывает невролог и сомнолог Ирина Галеева. Есть популярное мнение, что чем больше сна, тем лучше. Многие даже гордятся своей способностью долго спать. Но, к сожалению, научные данные показывают, что сон более 10 часов в сутки ассоциирован с повышенным риском смертности (примерно на 34–48%). Крупные метаанализы демонст…
👍9🔥3🕊1
Пока сама сгенерировать посты не могу, делюсь классным постом нашего врача-сомнолога Ирины Галеевой на тему длительного сна)
Всегда ли нужен самый дорогой психиатр? Мне кажется, один из самых частых вопросов, который возникает у пациентов при выборе врача: «А почему один психиатр стоит 5000 рублей, а другой 15000?» И если честно, это очень правильный вопрос. Потому что со стороны действительно непонятно. Один врач лучше другого? Более умный? Или просто более известный? Я сама регулярно оказываюсь в роли пациента соматического звена и за…
❤55💯8🔥6👍3🥴1
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @psycho_pharmacologist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@handlingbettercenter · 20,161
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 28 September 2026
@doc_kras · 19,312
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 4 October 2026
@doctor_galeeva · 28,864
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 9 September 2026
@dr_sychev · 49,399
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 August 2026
@psychiatristonline · 20,777
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 September 2026
@pure_cognitions_adhd · 28,395
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 September 2026
@pribytkov_psy · 40,380
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 30 August 2026
@pure_cognitions · 38,865
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 31 August 2026
@stillvasilisa · 24,563
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 September 2026
@psy_and_neuro · 22,535
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 September 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Psycho_pharmacologist” (@psycho_pharmacologist), 6,199 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psycho_pharmacologist.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.