Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for UpScale

Channel

UpScale

@UpScale_club

On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,729subscribers

-23 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001872775109
TypeChannel
Username@UpScale_club
DescriptionПространство владельцев бизнеса, CEO, топов и практиков из разных индустрий, кому интересна тема будущего управления и команд. Создаем и интегрируем будущее через людей, концепции и системы. Связь: @AP_UpScale, @AK_UpScale, @morozetc
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held23
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/UpScale_club

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

7,6817,7537,7176 August 2026 — 7,752 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,753 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,749 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,732 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,727 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,734 subscribers22 August 2026 — 7,724 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,718 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,708 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,704 subscribers5 September 2026 — 7,700 subscribers10 September 2026 — 7,696 subscribers18 September 2026 — 7,685 subscribers27 September 2026 — 7,681 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,695 subscribers15 October 2026 — 7,694 subscribers18 October 2026 — 7,692 subscribers21 October 2026 — 7,691 subscribers24 October 2026 — 7,692 subscribers27 October 2026 — 7,693 subscribers29 October 2026 — 7,708 subscribers2 November 2026 — 7,717 subscribers5 November 2026 — 7,729 subscribers7,7296 August 20265 November 2026
23 measurements spanning 91 days, net -23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,670–7,764 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 05:397,729+12
2 Nov 2026, 00:287,717+9
29 Oct 2026, 18:287,708+15
27 Oct 2026, 04:077,693+1
24 Oct 2026, 10:457,692+1
21 Oct 2026, 20:597,691-1
18 Oct 2026, 21:407,692-2
15 Oct 2026, 17:217,694-1
5 Oct 2026, 17:567,695+14
27 Sept 2026, 23:547,681-4
18 Sept 2026, 16:587,685-11
10 Sept 2026, 20:587,696-4
5 Sept 2026, 09:387,700-4
1 Sept 2026, 04:037,704-4
29 Aug 2026, 07:047,708-10
26 Aug 2026, 04:157,718-6
22 Aug 2026, 22:587,724-10
19 Aug 2026, 14:187,734+7
16 Aug 2026, 16:457,727-5
13 Aug 2026, 04:247,732first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 20 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.2%
avg views ÷ 7,729 subscribers
Avg views / post
789
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.20%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 40 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held40 (20 June 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total9,469
Reactions total108
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 12:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
485
Videos
5
Links
496

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

326 reactions across 38 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤15146.3%
🔥7924.2%
👍5516.9%
❤‍🔥133.99%
💯82.45%
🫡41.23%
⚡30.92%
✍30.92%
👏20.613%
🙏20.613%
🤔20.613%
🤩20.613%
🐳10.307%
🤓10.307%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 326 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 40 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @UpScale_club. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 40 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 June 2026 to 3 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 12 posts held from the last 30 days (8.33%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

3 Nov 2026, 04:32 UTC610 views2 reactionsread 6 November 2026
File

Что стоит проверить, прежде чем заменять людей ИИ? Мы собрали 16 историй о том, как компании внедряют ИИ и меняют команды. Ford привлек опытных инженеров, чтобы улучшать качество и дорабатывать ИИ-системы. Klarna возобновила найм людей в поддержку, сохранив автоматизацию. Commonwealth Bank of Australia отменил сокращение 45 должностей и признал ошибку в оценке потребности в сотрудниках. В России и Казахстане тоже е…

👍2

Signed Кожемякина (Мороз) Катерина

2 Nov 2026, 04:10 UTC706 views14 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Зачем платить консультантам, если создатели ИИ сами приходят его внедрять? В Кремниевой долине есть выражение kill zone, «зона поражения». Так говорят о компании, чей продукт крупный игрок решил превратить в функцию собственного. Chegg, сервис помощи с домашними заданиями, уже испытал это на себе: студенты ушли к чат-ботам, и бизнес почти обрушился. Акции Gartner за 2025 год упали на 47,9% на фоне замедления роста и…

❤8👍4🔥2

Signed Анна Паршина

30 Oct 2026, 06:59 UTC377 views3 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @futureadies

Offline Future Talks #16 Будущее работы: кем, как и зачем мы будем работать? 17 декабря 10:00 Если ИИ повышает производительность, означает ли это, что человеку придётся работать меньше? Или просто иначе? Еще недавно мы обсуждали будущее работы через удалёнку, гибкие графики, новые профессии и навыки. Сегодня вопрос ставится гораздо шире: что вообще будет считаться работой, когда всё больше интеллектуальных задач…

❤1🔥1🙏1

Signed Анна Паршина

26 Oct 2026, 04:25 UTC≈2,060 views33 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Что будет, если убрать из компании всех людей? Мечта последних двух лет - организация без сотрудников. Ни больничных, ни проблем с наймом, ни совещаний, ни растущего ФОТ. Только ИИ-агенты, которые просто работают. General Reasoning построили такую компанию. Модель Avalon-M1: CEO-агент сам нанимает до 8 специалистов, все общаются через мессенджер с каналами и личками, а вознаграждение команда получает одно на всех.…

🔥20❤12👍1

Signed Анна Паршина

23 Oct 2026, 04:41 UTC590 views8 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Потому что что такое обучение, если не перемены? Удивительные разговоры за день случились вокруг темы лидерского развития - сначала с Катей Тышковской, потом с Алексом Гидиримом. И по закону резонанса, прямо сразу после Future Talks про Будущее образования, HoBB выпускает интервью с Тевис Троуэр, консультантом по вопросам лидерства и соруководителем The Beautiful Business School. Далее цитаты. «Обучение требует см…

💯6❤2

Signed Анна Паршина

22 Oct 2026, 07:19 UTC537 views10 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Как устроены рабочие коммуникации в вашей компании и чего в них не хватает? Наши коллеги из TripleA Advisory и Headwork Analytics проводят исследование о том, как средние и крупные компании в России используют сервисы для рабочих коммуникаций: что удобно, что мешает и каких возможностей недостаёт. Ищем HR-директоров, директоров по маркетингу и коммуникациям, готовых поделиться своим опытом. Это исследовательская бе…

❤7👍3

Signed Анна Паршина

20 Oct 2026, 11:12 UTC498 views8 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @futureadiesFile

Сначала ещё немного поучусь У обучения есть возможность, которую не продают как УТП: с его помощью можно отложить перемены и при этом совершенно искренне считать, что ими занимаешься. Причём учиться можно всерьёз и с пользой. Просто решение о том, что делать со своей работой или жизнью, на время получает уважительную отсрочку. «Я пока ничего не решила» - тревожное заявление. «Я сейчас учусь» - уже вполне прилично, …

❤8

Signed Анна Паршина

20 Oct 2026, 09:29 UTC479 viewsread 6 November 2026

Обновили календарь мероприятий по управлению, hr, оргразвитию, лидерству и работе с командами. КАЛЕНДАРЬ Апскейл

19 Oct 2026, 14:29 UTC≈1,010 views9 reactions1 Starread 6 November 2026
Photo

«Мы уже используем ИИ» - пока довольно неполный ответ на вопрос о готовности компании к нему. Можно внедрить технологию в рабочие процессы и продолжать разбираться, что она меняет в стратегии, управлении и отношениях между людьми. Об этом 2026 Global Leadership Study, четвёртое ежегодное исследование Harvard Business Impact о лидерстве и развитии руководителей (в комментарии прицепила целый отчет). В основе опрос …

👍5❤3👏1

Signed Анна Паршина

17 Oct 2026, 11:29 UTC925 views6 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Темп CEO на «кончиках пальцев». В новом номере HBR вышла прекрасная статья Нитина Нории, бывшего декана Harvard Business School, How CEOs Set the Tempo, об одной из самых недооценённых управленческих компетенций - способности задавать и менять темп организации. CEO нередко терпят неудачу не потому, что выбрали неправильную стратегию, а потому, что реализовывали её в неправильном темпе. Причём темп здесь это не просто…

❤5👏1

Signed Анна Паршина

15 Oct 2026, 11:58 UTC637 views10 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

В обучении взрослых мне все больше нравятся форматы, где можно посмотреть на себя в действии. Мы приходим учиться со своим опытом, знаниями и способами справляться с трудностями, которые складывались годами. И иногда привычка срабатывает быстрее, чем мы успеваем вспомнить все, что знаем про делегирование, обратную связь или работу с командой. При этом заметить такую привычку самому бывает сложно, особенно когда вокр…

❤‍🔥9🔥1

Signed Кожемякина (Мороз) Катерина

14 Oct 2026, 05:15 UTC≈1,040 views5 reactions1 Starread 6 November 2026
Photo

Когда анализировать умеют все В HBR вышла статья о том, что отличает сильных стратегов в эпоху ИИ, которая очень точно называет проблему, которая у нас фигурирует во многих разговорах: как создавать стратегическое отличие, когда у конкурентов всё больше возможностей одинаково с вами хорошо разобраться в рынке? Данные, инструменты анализа, моделирование сценариев, тренд-репорты становятся доступнее и доступнее. Комп…

❤5

Signed Анна Паршина

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @UpScale_club. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

18 Aug 2026, 07:12 UTCAnonymous Poll134 voters

Всем привет! Как ваш август?

  1. Активно планируем деловой сезон23%
  2. Только начался отпуск7%
  3. Вовсю стратегируем уже14%
  4. Как июль, июнь и все предыдущие - не поднимая головы38%
  5. Неспешно, но работаем20%
  6. Другое10%

The shares total 112%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 3 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

WTF_HR
@WTF_HR · 19,221
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 2 October 2026
The Future Of Work
@thefutureofwork · 21,113
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 26 September 2026
Пригодится! 🍎 Библиотека для HR
@savetoreadlater · 22,093
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 21 September 2026
Лидерская позиция | Андрей Шапенко
@leadership_position · 27,449
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 11 September 2026
REFORUM
@reforum · 18,743
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 5 October 2026
Филипп Гузенюк I Счастье в деятельности
@guzenuk · 22,037
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 21 September 2026
HR[хаб]вакансии
@hrhubvacancy · 22,847
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 20 September 2026
СберУниверситет
@sber_university · 24,305
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 17 September 2026
HR-аналитика
@hranalitycs · 34,236
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 3 September 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“UpScale” (@UpScale_club), 7,729 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UpScale_club.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.