Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Такер Карлсон на русском и другие

Channel

Такер Карлсон на русском и другие

@tuckerrus

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

35,176subscribers

-19 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001647300216
TypeChannel
Username@tuckerrus
DescriptionТакер Карлсон на русском и другие. Этот канал посвящен - Такеру Карлсону, Скотту Риттеру и другим медийным личностям Запада, а также цитировании западных СМИ. Для связи @Tuckerrus_bot По рекламе: @louistgg Скамерам возврат не делаем!
Created8 April 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/tuckerrus

Growth

35,12035,29335,206.56 August 2026 — 35,195 subscribers6 August 2026 — 35,188 subscribers8 August 2026 — 35,179 subscribers9 August 2026 — 35,168 subscribers10 August 2026 — 35,149 subscribers11 August 2026 — 35,136 subscribers12 August 2026 — 35,134 subscribers12 August 2026 — 35,120 subscribers14 August 2026 — 35,184 subscribers15 August 2026 — 35,285 subscribers16 August 2026 — 35,293 subscribers17 August 2026 — 35,283 subscribers18 August 2026 — 35,272 subscribers19 August 2026 — 35,270 subscribers20 August 2026 — 35,260 subscribers21 August 2026 — 35,271 subscribers23 August 2026 — 35,285 subscribers24 August 2026 — 35,262 subscribers26 August 2026 — 35,253 subscribers27 August 2026 — 35,249 subscribers28 August 2026 — 35,239 subscribers29 August 2026 — 35,254 subscribers30 August 2026 — 35,242 subscribers31 August 2026 — 35,237 subscribers1 September 2026 — 35,225 subscribers2 September 2026 — 35,224 subscribers3 September 2026 — 35,211 subscribers5 September 2026 — 35,186 subscribers8 September 2026 — 35,176 subscribers35,1766 August 20268 September 2026
29 measurements spanning 33 days, net -19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 35,094–35,319 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 11:1635,176-10
5 Sept 2026, 07:5935,186-25
3 Sept 2026, 10:2335,211-13
2 Sept 2026, 06:5335,224-1
1 Sept 2026, 04:2435,225-12
31 Aug 2026, 01:1735,237-5
30 Aug 2026, 02:4835,242-12
29 Aug 2026, 02:1335,254+15
28 Aug 2026, 03:0335,239-10
27 Aug 2026, 04:1835,249-4
26 Aug 2026, 02:1735,253-9
24 Aug 2026, 22:4235,262-23
23 Aug 2026, 07:3535,285+14
21 Aug 2026, 18:5835,271+11
20 Aug 2026, 18:5835,260-10
19 Aug 2026, 20:5335,270-2
18 Aug 2026, 19:3635,272-11
17 Aug 2026, 20:5835,283-10
16 Aug 2026, 22:2335,293+8
15 Aug 2026, 17:2835,285first reading

Engagement

344 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 71 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.5%
avg views ÷ 35,176 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,430
266 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
266
of 344 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 September 2026
Posts held344 (5 August 20269 September 2026)
Views total1,445,680
Reactions total36,500
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Sept 2026, 13:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
13,600
Videos
12,100
Links
2,500

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 37m
Average length
42s

Measured directly from 138 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

43,770 reactions across 328 posts, in 49 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5,95113.6%
🤣5,77813.2%
🤬5,53512.6%
🤡3,9449.01%
🔥2,3565.38%
😁2,1784.98%
2,1714.96%
🖕1,9784.52%
💩1,7684.04%
💊1,6373.74%
💯1,5633.57%
🤮1,4503.31%
🤔9632.20%
🤯9502.17%
👏9302.12%
😱8982.05%
👀7151.63%
👎4611.05%
🤷‍♂4060.928%
🙏3890.889%
29 further kinds1,7494.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 344 of the 344 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45,009 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 344 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 9 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 344 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tuckerrus. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 344 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 9 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Sept 2026, 12:23 UTC≈1,080 views25 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Photo

В трёх районах Москвы капитально ремонтируют бомбоубежища. Работы затронут несколько защитных сооружений на Азовской, Болотниковской, Ленинском проспекте и Нагорной улице. На ремонт выделили 39 млн рублей, завершить его планируют до 30 ноября.

👏13🤯6👍3🙏2👌1

9 Sept 2026, 07:21 UTC≈2,850 views51 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Video

США уничтожили пять иранских нефтяных танкеров после того, как КСИР дважды за последние два дня нацелился на военный корабль ВМС США баллистическими ракетами, — Центральное командование американскими ВС.

🤬39👀7🤔41

9 Sept 2026, 05:34 UTC≈3,420 views84 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Photo

Мы посчитали важным присутствие российской делегации на G20, — министр финансов США Бессент. Потому что, если вы не собираетесь разговаривать, как вы собираетесь закончить этот ужасный конфликт?

👍63🤡13🤔43🔥1

9 Sept 2026, 04:31 UTC≈3,700 views119 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Photo

Такер Карлсон утверждает, что алгебра — это фейк, а люди, которые «подмешивают буквы в числа», находятся в матрице Карлсон удивляется, зачем алгебра вставляет буквы в числа. Собеседник Джесс Элофсон объясняет: «Думаю, просто чтобы тебя зае**ть». Они рассуждают о том, что никогда в жизни не встречали никого, кто использует алгебру, — это «фейковая математика» для людей «в матрице». И приходят к выводу, что забота

👀44💊31🤔14🤡12🤣951👍1

9 Sept 2026, 03:18 UTC≈3,980 views125 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Photo

Трамп – объяснил победу АдГ на выборах в Германии: Вау! Популистская партия в Германии только что провела действительно очень успешную ночь. Им наконец надоели совершенно ужасные иммиграционные правила и нормы, которые так сильно навредили Германии. Они на подъеме и больше не собираются это терпеть! Сделайте Германию снова великой!

👍86😁32👏3🤔3🔥1

9 Sept 2026, 02:38 UTC≈4,070 views115 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Photo

Россия предложит провести российско-германо-американский бизнес-форум в 2027 году для возобновления делового диалога. Об этом заявил глава РФПИ Кирилл Дмитриев.

🤪59🤡27👍11👎85🤔5

8 Sept 2026, 15:09 UTC≈4,980 views156 reactionsread 9 September 2026

КСИР только что заявил, что этим утром в Ормузском проливе был захвачен американский подводный беспилотник. В Тегеране утверждают, что речь идет об одном из самых современных аппаратов ВМС США, который удалось захватить в результате сложной разведывательной операции. "Пруфы" обещают в самое ближайшее время.

👍12814🔥9👀4👎1

8 Sept 2026, 15:08 UTC≈5,230 views119 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Photo

Так и було

🤣96💯15😁3🤬21🤝1🤡1

8 Sept 2026, 12:54 UTC≈5,180 views206 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Photo

На этой стадии уже не очень понятно, кто перед нами – Ангела Меркель или Борис Джонсон.

🤣183😁18👍3👎1👏1

8 Sept 2026, 12:41 UTC≈4,950 views157 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Photo

Финляндия наконец закончила строить забор на границе с Россией. Стройка шла четыре года и влетела в копеечку — 356 млн евро.Но на этом траты не заканчиваются: по данным Yle, каждый год на обслуживание этой конструкции будут уходить еще 1,5 млн евро.

🤡101😁28💊23🤮4👎1

8 Sept 2026, 12:03 UTC≈4,940 views95 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Photo

Британия продолжает активно помогать Украине с самого начала войны. Стало известно, что они выделяют еще 116 миллионов евро (100 млн фунтов) на защиту украинского неба. Эти деньги пойдут на усиление ПВО к зиме, в том числе на закупку ракет для Patriot.

🤬903🤯1😈1

8 Sept 2026, 11:19 UTC≈4,970 views76 reactions2 Starsread 9 September 2026
Photo

С 8 сентября Канада перешла к политике протекционизма в ответ на действия США, установив тарифные барьеры до 50%. Принцип "доллар за доллар" стал основой стратегии Оттавы, направленной на компенсацию ущерба от американских торговых ограничений.

👀35😁18👍134🤡4👎1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 344 posts we hold for @tuckerrus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Такер Карлсон на русском и другие” (@tuckerrus), 35,176 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tuckerrus.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.