Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for bullmarketmarker

Channel

bullmarketmarker

@BullMarketMarker

On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1subscribers

-24,540 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001871175726
TypeChannel
Username@BullMarketMarker
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live20 August 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 20 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/BullMarketMarker

Previous handles

@BullMarketMarker was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.

@BullMarketMarker
held 7 August 20267 August 2026

Growth

124,54112,2717 August 2026 — 24,541 subscribers7 August 2026 — 24,529 subscribers8 August 2026 — 24,522 subscribers9 August 2026 — 24,506 subscribers10 August 2026 — 24,491 subscribers11 August 2026 — 24,461 subscribers12 August 2026 — 24,439 subscribers13 August 2026 — 24,424 subscribers14 August 2026 — 24,406 subscribers16 August 2026 — 24,383 subscribers17 August 2026 — 24,357 subscribers18 August 2026 — 24,331 subscribers19 August 2026 — 24,319 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1 subscribers7 August 202620 August 2026
14 measurements spanning 14 days, net -24,540. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
20 Aug 2026, 17:031-24,318
19 Aug 2026, 19:4624,319-12
18 Aug 2026, 19:0824,331-26
17 Aug 2026, 15:4924,357-26
16 Aug 2026, 07:0624,383-23
14 Aug 2026, 20:2824,406-18
13 Aug 2026, 11:1624,424-15
12 Aug 2026, 09:4424,439-22
11 Aug 2026, 09:5224,461-30
10 Aug 2026, 07:0324,491-15
9 Aug 2026, 07:5324,506-16
8 Aug 2026, 04:5124,522-7
7 Aug 2026, 07:4824,529-12
7 Aug 2026, 00:1724,541first reading

Engagement

121 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
74701.4%
avg views ÷ 1 subscribers
Avg views / post
747
73 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.55%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
73
of 121 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 51 of 73 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held121 (2 August 202619 August 2026)
Views total54,532
Reactions total210
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 04:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

336 reactions across 88 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
18755.7%
🔥7221.4%
👍308.93%
🤩144.17%
🆒133.87%
🎉123.57%
82.38%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 91 of the 121 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 336 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 121 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 121 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @BullMarketMarker. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 121 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 19 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 17:54 UTC525 views3 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

$2Z update OBV never lies . The next move is happening when the chart is breaking out 👍

3

19 Aug 2026, 17:34 UTC421 views3 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @BCUSARealPhoto

$BMT has more potential than $Mubarak. With ~ $11M Marketcap + 90% top holders in 10 wallets. Almost everything is unlocked. I think it will be pumped x2 - x3 soon 🔥 What do you think ?👀

3

19 Aug 2026, 08:08 UTC826 views5 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Long $MUBARAK 1D BULLISH 📈 Detailed explanation 👇 ✉️Telegram | 🐣Twitter

🔥5

18 Aug 2026, 05:41 UTC≈1,030 views6 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

$BTC 1W CVD ETF inflows have turned positive in just 3 days. The stock price closed with a bullish candle in a single day. Here's the CVD data. Based on the average (blue line), the data is very positive, but the largest "whale" (brown) is still showing a defensive pattern. The resistance level at 62k remains, and significant resistance levels are still difficult to find. This is the liquidation map. Currently, t

6

18 Aug 2026, 05:36 UTC927 views3 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

EVAAUSDT – LONG 📈📈📈 Entry 2: 0.785 - 0.795 Targets: 🎯 **0.92 0.97 1 1.06** Stop-loss: 0.7

🔥3

17 Aug 2026, 15:29 UTC793 views3 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @BCUSAReal

Feeling bullish 📈📊📈

3

Showing the 12 most recent of 121 posts we hold for @BullMarketMarker. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Aug 2026, 18:37 UTCAnonymous Poll769 voters

New signal tormorrow ? 🤔

  1. Yes86%
  2. No16%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

11 Aug 2026, 09:21 UTCAnonymous Poll115 voters

Market today ?

  1. Long52%
  2. Short52%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

2 Aug 2026, 18:05 UTCAnonymous Poll744 voters

What’s your primary trading style….. ?🔫

  1. Scalping ⚡️52%
  2. Swing trading ⌛️42%
  3. Another 💀17%

The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 121 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 19 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Blockchain Usa Official ( Binance ) 🐋
@BCUSAReal · 148,051
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 August 2026
GG-Shøt. Indicator & Signals
@ggshot · 93,391
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 17 August 2026
Crypto Insiders Talk
@crypto_insiders · 201,862
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 August 2026
Rose Premium Signals 🌹
@RosePremiumm · 146,347
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
Trading Coach
@tradingcoach · 70,724
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 August 2026
CRYPTO CLASSICS
@CryptoClassics · 127,355
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
Rose Paid Crypto Free ™🔒
@PAIDROSE · 143,453
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
Trading Crypto Guide ™
@TCGFORYOU · 75,607
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 19 August 2026
Crypto VIP ЯR ™
@CryptoRROFFICAIL · 181,983
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
Binance 360
@binance_360 · 101,829
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 15 August 2026
Only Trades
@OnlyTradesX · 75,891
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 19 August 2026
Crypto Musk
@crypto_musk1 · 81,529
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 18 August 2026
Crypto VIP Signal
@CryptoVIPsignalTA · 319,039
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
Wall Street Crypto Trading
@Wallstreetcryptotrader · 104,006
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
A.R.S. CRYPTO | FOREX™
@arscryptocalls7 · 131,590
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 August 2026
The Bull
@thebull_crypto · 176,069
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
Binance Spot & FutuRes Signals 🐋
@next10xgem1 · 333,179
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
Rose 🌹
@rose · 85,750
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026
Crypto Safe Calls™
@Crypto_Safe_Calls · 134,703
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 13 August 2026
Gorilla Crypto
@gorilla_crypto · 198,569
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 August 2026
The Crypto Express
@thecryptoexpress · 261,006
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
Crypto Signals ©
@whalescryptovip · 209,022
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 August 2026
Crypto Planet Calls™
@CryptoPlanetCalls · 104,426
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 15 August 2026
Whales Crypto Guide
@Whalesguide · 202,470
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 27 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“bullmarketmarker” (@BullMarketMarker), 1 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BullMarketMarker.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.