Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for УНИВЕРСИТЕТ НУТРИЦИОЛОГИИ

Channel

УНИВЕРСИТЕТ НУТРИЦИОЛОГИИ

@munn3begining

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,459subscribers

-80 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001578384668
TypeChannel
Username@munn3begining
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/munn3begining

Growth

5,4595,5395,4997 August 2026 — 5,539 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,539 subscribers8 August 2026 — 5,535 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,524 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,516 subscribers16 August 2026 — 5,511 subscribers19 August 2026 — 5,503 subscribers22 August 2026 — 5,488 subscribers25 August 2026 — 5,481 subscribers28 August 2026 — 5,470 subscribers31 August 2026 — 5,459 subscribers7 August 202631 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 24 days, net -80. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,447–5,551 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 15:155,459-11
28 Aug 2026, 22:365,470-11
25 Aug 2026, 14:265,481-7
22 Aug 2026, 13:025,488-15
19 Aug 2026, 10:585,503-8
16 Aug 2026, 18:125,511-5
13 Aug 2026, 15:265,516-8
10 Aug 2026, 22:125,524-11
8 Aug 2026, 06:225,535-4
7 Aug 2026, 07:305,539no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:295,539first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 10 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.76%
avg views ÷ 5,459 subscribers
Avg views / post
205
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.916%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held24 (10 July 202610 August 2026)
Views total1,641
Reactions total9
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

48 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3981.3%
🔥510.4%
👍12.08%
👏12.08%
🙏12.08%
🥰12.08%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 13:11 UTC191 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Какой блок «Метода» дался бы вам тяжелее всего?

  1. Желчь и печень13%
  2. Микробиота и СИБР20%
  3. Щитовидка и гормоны47%
  4. Железо и дефициты13%
  5. Сборка протокола целиком47%

The shares total 140%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

10 Aug 2026, 13:09 UTC172 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Разбор ответов: 🔹 Желчь. Горечь во рту по утрам вместе с осветлённым стулом и тяжестью после жирного — ранний маркер застоя желчи, ещё до камней и изменений на УЗИ. 🔹 Щитовидка. ТТГ показывает сигнал гипофиза, а не работу гормона в клетках. Частый сбой — конверсия Т4 в активный Т3 (селен, цинк, железо, кортизол, кишечник). Смотрим Т3 свободный и реверсивный Т3. 🔹 Эстроген. β-глюкуронидаза кишечных микробов «раскон

3

10 Aug 2026, 12:48 UTC156 viewsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Что возвращает уже выведенный эстроген обратно в кровь?

  1. Микробная β-глюкуронидаза (эстроболом)63%
  2. Желудочная кислота5%
  3. Инсулин18%
  4. Панкреатические ферменты13%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Aug 2026, 12:46 UTC157 viewsread 12 August 2026
Poll

ТТГ 1,8, а у пациентки все симптомы гипотиреоза. Где чаще ломается?

  1. Конверсия Т4 в Т384%
  2. Гипофиз8%
  3. Нехватка йода в питании5%
  4. Нигде, это вариант нормы3%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Aug 2026, 12:44 UTC159 viewsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Что раньше всего указывает на сниженное желчеотделение?

  1. Горечь во рту по утрам73%
  2. Боль внизу живота2%
  3. Диарея сразу после еды12%
  4. Изжога натощак12%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Aug 2026, 12:41 UTC187 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Что разбирают на 6-й неделе обучения. Проверьте себя Есть момент, когда разрозненные знания складываются в систему. У участников «Метода Здоровый Кишечник» он наступает на 6-й неделе из 8 — сейчас как раз она. На этом этапе они впервые собирают протокол пациента целиком: от желчи и ЖКТ до гормонов, в правильном порядке. Проверьте, на каком вы уровне. Три вопроса из материала недели 👇

7 Aug 2026, 13:58 UTC286 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🩸 5 ошибок нутрициолога в работе с железом Ферритин 25, в бланке «норма» — и специалист назначает железо. А это назначение вслепую. Разберём 5 типичных ошибок. Ошибка 1. Смотреть на гемоглобин. Гемоглобин падает последним. Сначала пустеют запасы — ферритин. Нормальный гемоглобин при ферритине 15 — не «всё хорошо», а поздняя стадия дефицита. Ошибка 2. Считать «норму» ферритина достаточностью. Лаборатория пишет «нор

5

5 Aug 2026, 12:35 UTC333 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Микробиом «предсказал» темп старения. Что можно говорить пациенту, а что нельзя Разбор для специалистов: учимся читать первоисточник, а не заголовок. Новость: «микробиом предсказывает биологическое старение». Громкое заявление. Смотрим саму работу. Что реально сделали Университет Гавайев, 123 участника. Сопоставили состав микробиоты с DunedinPACE — маркером темпа старения по метилированию ДНК. Модель на уровне ви

1

3 Aug 2026, 14:13 UTC388 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Ось кишечник–печень–желчь: когда «гормональная» жалоба лечится желчью Классика приёма: у пациентки ПМС, отёки во второй половине цикла, раздражительность, болезненные месячные. Звучит как чистая гормональная история. А корень часто в желчи. И пока не налажен её отток, ни один эстрогеновый протокол не поедет. Как это связано Отработанные эстрогены обезвреживает печень и выводит их с желчью в кишечник. Дальше — два

4🔥3🥰1

1 Aug 2026, 18:21 UTC395 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Отличный повод потренировать главный навык специалиста — читать исследование, а не заголовок. Новость недели: креатин усиливает противоопухолевый иммунитет. Звучит как сенсация. Идём к первоисточнику — свежая работа UCLA. Что показали на самом деле Креатин повышает активность дендритных клеток — тех, что «показывают» опухоль киллерным Т-лимфоцитам и запускают иммунный ответ. Механизм изящный: креатин работает как

1👏1

30 Jul 2026, 09:50 UTC424 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Лабораторная «норма» показывает одно: серьёзной болезни нет. И всё. Хорошо ли вы себя чувствуете, она не говорит. Дело в том, как эта норма считается: берут всех, кто сдаёт анализ, и выводят средний диапазон. Но среди сдающих полно людей с неоптимальным здоровьем — и они тоже попадают в «норму». Поэтому есть второй ориентир — оптимум: значение, при котором человек полон сил и энергии, а не просто «не болен». Между «

4🙏1

29 Jul 2026, 10:15 UTC403 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Самая частая ошибка — собрать протокол «по жалобам»: тут витамин, там гормон, сверху адаптоген. Пациент пьёт горстями — результата нет. Потому что протокол это не список баночек, а последовательность. И начинается она всегда с фундамента — пищеварения. Вот как выстроена система по шагам: Шаг 1. Метабиотик — фундамент. С него начинается всё: восстанавливаем микробиом и среду в кишечнике. Это метаболиты полезных ба

3👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @munn3begining. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 8 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Aug 2026, 13:11 UTCAnonymous Poll15 voters

Какой блок «Метода» дался бы вам тяжелее всего?

  1. Желчь и печень13%
  2. Микробиота и СИБР20%
  3. Щитовидка и гормоны47%
  4. Железо и дефициты13%
  5. Сборка протокола целиком47%

The shares total 140%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

10 Aug 2026, 12:48 UTCAnonymous Quiz38 voters

Что возвращает уже выведенный эстроген обратно в кровь?

  1. Микробная β-глюкуронидаза (эстроболом)63%
  2. Желудочная кислота5%
  3. Инсулин18%
  4. Панкреатические ферменты13%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Aug 2026, 12:46 UTCAnonymous Quiz38 voters

ТТГ 1,8, а у пациентки все симптомы гипотиреоза. Где чаще ломается?

  1. Конверсия Т4 в Т384%
  2. Гипофиз8%
  3. Нехватка йода в питании5%
  4. Нигде, это вариант нормы3%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Aug 2026, 12:44 UTCAnonymous Quiz41 voters

Что раньше всего указывает на сниженное желчеотделение?

  1. Горечь во рту по утрам73%
  2. Боль внизу живота2%
  3. Диарея сразу после еды12%
  4. Изжога натощак12%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

22 Jul 2026, 14:50 UTCAnonymous Quiz73 voters

Почему при СИБР пробиотик «в лоб» может усилить симптомы?

  1. Мы добавляем бактерии и субстрат в уже перенаселённую тонкую кишку92%
  2. Пробиотик всегда вреден0%
  3. Пробиотик снижает кислотность желудка5%
  4. Пробиотик блокирует всасывание железа3%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

22 Jul 2026, 14:47 UTCAnonymous Quiz71 voters

У клиентки «идеальный» рацион — много овощей и отрубей, но стало только хуже. При подозрении на СИБР о чём это говорит?

  1. Клетчатка кормит избыточную флору не в том отделе кишечника61%
  2. Клиентка просто мало пьет воды11%
  3. Не хватает пищеварительных ферментов27%
  4. Нужно добавить ещё больше клетчатки1%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Здоровье с Екатериной Новиковой
@katerina_dietolog · 50,574
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 25 August 2026
Про здоровье | Наталья Кондакова врач функциональной медицины
@nataliakondakova_naturopat · 68,883
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 August 2026
Доктор Берг (A+) | кето диета | здоровье | похудение
@drBerg · 70,295
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
Адоньева про похудение
@adonevabody · 47,909
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 30 August 2026
Гастроэнтеролог Ольга Помойнецкая
@olga_pomoynetskaya · 253,677
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 August 2026
UNA.TUNA
@unatuna22 · 41,857
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 29 August 2026
Академия Нутрициологии
@nsa_academy · 63,785
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 21 August 2026
Эндокринолог ❤️ Ольга Павлова 💊 Диабет
@dia_dietolog_olga_pavlova · 59,439
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 22 August 2026
Доктор Анна Читанава
@annacheeta · 33,876
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 3 September 2026
Николай Панасюк | Нутрициология | GetFit
@nikolay_panasiuk · 37,342
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 1 September 2026
Клуб нутрициологов
@miin_ankz · 49,353
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 August 2026
Панасюк Николай
@getfit_nutrition · 70,429
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“УНИВЕРСИТЕТ НУТРИЦИОЛОГИИ” (@munn3begining), 5,459 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/munn3begining.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.