Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
59 measurements spanning 90 days, net +134. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 41,713–42,292 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 21:29
41,914
-24
4 Nov 2026, 23:50
41,938
-37
3 Nov 2026, 21:49
41,975
-36
2 Nov 2026, 19:20
42,011
-18
1 Nov 2026, 21:26
42,029
-8
31 Oct 2026, 18:57
42,037
+11
30 Oct 2026, 18:38
42,026
-14
29 Oct 2026, 16:44
42,040
-15
28 Oct 2026, 17:59
42,055
-30
27 Oct 2026, 14:31
42,085
-17
26 Oct 2026, 14:15
42,102
-10
25 Oct 2026, 16:38
42,112
+11
24 Oct 2026, 13:48
42,101
+33
23 Oct 2026, 12:46
42,068
+20
22 Oct 2026, 11:20
42,048
-6
21 Oct 2026, 06:36
42,054
+3
20 Oct 2026, 07:10
42,051
+11
19 Oct 2026, 04:48
42,040
-25
18 Oct 2026, 02:10
42,065
+2
17 Oct 2026, 00:04
42,063
first reading
Engagement
206 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 181 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.34%
avg views ÷ 41,914 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,400
67 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.81%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
67
of 206 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 63 of 67 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
206 (29 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
93,760
Reactions total
1,596
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 14:03 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,150
Videos
≈249
Links
≈557
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
34m 43s
Average length
44s
Measured directly from 47 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
6,564 reactions across 195 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
3,038
46.3%
🔥
1,806
27.5%
👍
1,175
17.9%
👏
307
4.68%
🥰
83
1.26%
🤩
63
0.96%
😁
33
0.503%
😱
23
0.35%
🤔
21
0.32%
🎉
15
0.229%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 196 of the 206 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,564 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 206 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 67 posts held from the last 30 days (7.46%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Кстати, о птичках! Я к своей кухне отношусь серьёзно, потому что вся посуда и кухонные принадлежности напрямую контактируют с едой.
Чего на ней никогда не будет:
✖️ Дешёвых сковородок с антипригарным покрытием. Особенно если покрытие царапается, отслаивается или не выдерживает перегрева. Частицы повреждённого покрытия могут попадать в пищу
✖️ Пластиковых разделочных досок. При каждом движении ножа могут отделяться…
❤️ Моей посуде >10 лет, и я до сих пор не хочу её менять!
📌 Это iCook. Я выбрала её много лет назад и до сих пор готовлю на ней самые обычные блюда.
Мне нравится нержавеющая сталь, многослойное дно, которое помогает равномерно распределять тепло, и возможность готовить некоторые продукты с небольшим количеством воды. Но главный показатель для меня то, насколько удобно пользоваться посудой спустя годы.
А теперь сюр…
Вопрос прилетел в личку, не могу не ответить ↩️
❓ Что делать, когда уже есть камни в желчном?
Начать наконец обращать внимание на свой организм ✨
Желчный любит:
◾️ Движение (сидячий образ жизни ведёт к застоям).
◾️ Жиры в рационе.
◾️ Горечи (редиска, руккола, редька и т. д.).
◾️ Воду (желчь на 80% состоит из воды).
ОЧЕНЬ ВАЖНО ЗНАТЬ РАЗМЕР КАМНЕЙ!
• Самые опасные — камни до 13 мм, так как они могут сдвинуться и…
Ко мне на «Перезагрузку» редко приходят просто похудеть. Чаще — избавиться от проблем со здоровьем, вернуть энергию и наконец-то почувствовать себя хорошо. А снижение веса становится приятным бонусом))
📌9 ноября на бесплатном марафоне «3 ключа к здоровью» я открою Чёрную пятницу и продажи ПОСЛЕДНЕГО потока «Перезагрузки».
И вы меня знаете: я не из тех, кто объявляет о закрытии программы, а потом запускает её ещё де…
Почему я начинаю разбираться со здоровьем человека с вопросов о кишечнике?
➡️Когда ко мне приходит человек с жалобами на вес, кожу, усталость или выпадение волос, один из первых вопросов, который я задаю: «А как у вас работает ЖКТ?»
Почему? Потому что пищеварительная система отвечает не только за переваривание еды, но и за усвоение многих важных питательных веществ.
📌И вот что может происходить:
Нарушается пищева…
🥑 Ловите пользу к завтрашнему завтраку! Показываю, что выбираю сама как нутрициолог
Но помним, что правильный завтрак лишь верхушка айсберга! Можно питаться полезно, но всё равно страдать от вздутия, тяжести после еды, усталости и лишнего веса. Почему так происходит и что с этим делать?
💬 Разберём на моём бесплатном марафоне «3 ключа к здоровью» 9-11 ноября!
Не забудьте занять место можно по ссылке: https://bf.nut…
Я так часто рассказываю про истории моих учеников, и вот стало интересно, как дела у тех, кто на меня подписан, но ещё не проходил обучение?
Как мои знания и посты помогли вам со здоровьем? ⬇️
Добавили клетчатку в рацион, а живот стало раздувать ещё сильнее?
Вроде бы вы питаетесь как надо: налегли на овощи, купили квашеную капусту, добавили отруби. А к вечеру живот такой, что хочется расстегнуть брюки.
И тут обидно вдвойне, потому что вы ведь стараетесь. А получается наоборот: иногда именно попытки питаться здоровее вздутие и усиливают.
✔️ Записала для вас новое видео на тему: «Живот раздувается к вечер…
Я ОТКРЫВАЮ РЕГИСТРАЦИЮ НА ГЛАВНОЕ СОБЫТИЕ ГОДА ⚡️
Друзья, такого предложения в моей школе больше не будет в этом году!
9-11 ноября в 18:00 по МСК я проведу большой БЕСПЛАТНЫЙ марафон «3 КЛЮЧА К ЗДОРОВЬЮ», а вместе с ним открою ежегодную ЧЁРНУЮ ПЯТНИЦУ!
3 вечера = 3 эфира про важнейшие составляющие вашего здоровья:
9 ноября. Пищеварение и энергия. Разберу, почему возникают вздутие, тяжесть после еды и постоянная у…
❤12👍8🔥7👏4
Showing the 12 most recent of 206 posts we hold for @resurs_online. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@resurs_online edited 6 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
21 August 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 7 posts on @resurs_online as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
10 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
3 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
27 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Polls
The 6 most recent of 9 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 122%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
В чём вы чаще всего разогреваете еду в микроволновке?
В том же пластиковом контейнере, в котором она лежала7%
В стеклянной или керамической посуде51%
В тарелке, накрытой другой тарелкой17%
Разогреваю на плите, микроволновки нет35%
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Вижу по вашим сообщениям, что осенью многие стали чувствовать себя заметно хуже. Вы как?
Сильно упала энергия и настроение41%
Постоянно не высыпаюсь28%
Стала быстрее уставать25%
Всё как обычно, чувствую себя хорошо27%
The shares total 121%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Если честно, сама не знаю, как к этому отношусь 🤷♀️9%
Можно прекрасно жить и без него 🔥16%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
А что вам интересно узнать про
Америку глазами туриста?
Быт и цены44%
Еда и продукты38%
Странные правила и местные привычки62%
Люди и сервис23%
The shares total 167%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 206 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Лилия Стародубцева | Нутрициолог @lilystarfit_blog · 23,840 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 16 September 2026
Эндокринолог Либеранская @liberanskaya · 25,628 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 14 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“«Ресурс» Марины Жигульской” (@resurs_online), 41,914 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/resurs_online.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.