Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Опросы и замеры

Channel

Опросы и замеры

@oizmedia

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

21,754subscribers

+99 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001776215610
TypeChannel
Username@oizmedia
DescriptionРезультаты опросов и исследований общественного мнения в России и в мире – оперативно, точно, только главное. Канал Алексея Шаравского @alsharav РКН № 4801886589 Если что, будем здесь https://max.ru/oizmedia
Created31 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/oizmedia

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

21,64421,79221,7186 August 2026 — 21,655 subscribers6 August 2026 — 21,655 subscribers6 August 2026 — 21,654 subscribers7 August 2026 — 21,646 subscribers9 August 2026 — 21,647 subscribers10 August 2026 — 21,664 subscribers12 August 2026 — 21,654 subscribers12 August 2026 — 21,651 subscribers14 August 2026 — 21,650 subscribers15 August 2026 — 21,644 subscribers16 August 2026 — 21,679 subscribers17 August 2026 — 21,682 subscribers18 August 2026 — 21,672 subscribers20 August 2026 — 21,665 subscribers21 August 2026 — 21,662 subscribers23 August 2026 — 21,657 subscribers24 August 2026 — 21,650 subscribers26 August 2026 — 21,645 subscribers27 August 2026 — 21,651 subscribers28 August 2026 — 21,664 subscribers29 August 2026 — 21,665 subscribers30 August 2026 — 21,659 subscribers31 August 2026 — 21,652 subscribers2 September 2026 — 21,657 subscribers3 September 2026 — 21,673 subscribers5 September 2026 — 21,717 subscribers8 September 2026 — 21,738 subscribers11 September 2026 — 21,751 subscribers13 September 2026 — 21,766 subscribers14 September 2026 — 21,777 subscribers16 September 2026 — 21,780 subscribers18 September 2026 — 21,792 subscribers24 September 2026 — 21,779 subscribers3 October 2026 — 21,775 subscribers8 October 2026 — 21,763 subscribers12 October 2026 — 21,767 subscribers14 October 2026 — 21,776 subscribers15 October 2026 — 21,779 subscribers16 October 2026 — 21,778 subscribers17 October 2026 — 21,776 subscribers18 October 2026 — 21,773 subscribers19 October 2026 — 21,770 subscribers20 October 2026 — 21,764 subscribers21 October 2026 — 21,766 subscribers22 October 2026 — 21,771 subscribers23 October 2026 — 21,773 subscribers24 October 2026 — 21,790 subscribers25 October 2026 — 21,785 subscribers26 October 2026 — 21,787 subscribers27 October 2026 — 21,782 subscribers28 October 2026 — 21,781 subscribers29 October 2026 — 21,784 subscribers30 October 2026 — 21,782 subscribers31 October 2026 — 21,775 subscribers1 November 2026 — 21,770 subscribers2 November 2026 — 21,774 subscribers3 November 2026 — 21,777 subscribers4 November 2026 — 21,773 subscribers5 November 2026 — 21,770 subscribers6 November 2026 — 21,754 subscribers21,7546 August 20266 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 92 days, net +99. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,622–21,814 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 13:3521,754-16
5 Nov 2026, 12:5021,770-3
4 Nov 2026, 09:4921,773-4
3 Nov 2026, 08:3721,777+3
2 Nov 2026, 09:0621,774+4
1 Nov 2026, 10:4021,770-5
31 Oct 2026, 08:5821,775-7
30 Oct 2026, 11:1621,782-2
29 Oct 2026, 12:1021,784+3
28 Oct 2026, 13:4621,781-1
27 Oct 2026, 15:5821,782-5
26 Oct 2026, 13:4821,787+2
25 Oct 2026, 12:4021,785-5
24 Oct 2026, 10:3021,790+17
23 Oct 2026, 12:5621,773+2
22 Oct 2026, 16:0621,771+5
21 Oct 2026, 12:1621,766+2
20 Oct 2026, 07:2721,764-6
19 Oct 2026, 07:1021,770-3
18 Oct 2026, 10:2821,773first reading

Engagement

96 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 78 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.6%
avg views ÷ 21,754 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,350
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.31%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 96 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held96 (10 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total155,160
Reactions total3,578
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 02:52 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,820
Videos
≈12
Links
≈5,160

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

13,804 reactions across 94 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤡1,86313.5%
😁1,75212.7%
👍1,74212.6%
👎1,3479.76%
😢1,1748.50%
🤣1,1718.48%
🕊7785.64%
💯5113.70%
👌5013.63%
💊4793.47%
❤3062.22%
🤷‍♂2751.99%
✍2591.88%
🤓2271.64%
👀2141.55%
🤷‍♀1761.27%
💅1320.956%
🦄1270.92%
🤯1200.869%
🙈1090.79%
14 further kinds5413.92%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 96 of the 96 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14,030 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 96 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 29 posts held from the last 30 days (3.45%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 18:05 UTC≈5,430 views100 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Россияне стали больше опасаться объявления всеобщей мобилизации. При этом доля считающих, что надо начинать вторую волну, снизилась 🔹 58% россиян опасаются, что будет объявлена всеобщая мобилизация (год назад был 51%). 38% не опасаются (было 43%). 🔹 9% считают, что есть необходимость начать вторую волну мобилизации. 72% сказали, что такой необходимости нет. Год назад расклад был 11% против 67%. 📊 Опросы и заме…

🕊56😁16🤷‍♂15😢8👍5

5 Nov 2026, 09:20 UTC≈2,660 views49 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Россиян спросили: какая цель накопления лично вам сейчас кажется более привлекательной – первоначальный взнос на покупку квартиры или возможность не работать 6-12 месяцев? 52% – за квартиру, 26% – за возможность не работать полгода-год, Остальные затруднились с выбором. ✔️ Мужчины чаще женщин выбирают второй вариант. ✔️ Чем выше доход, тем чаще возможность какое-то время не работать кажется более привлекательной ц…

👌22👍14😁6✍4🤷‍♀3

5 Nov 2026, 07:47 UTC≈3,330 views104 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Российское кино года ФИЛЬМЫ 1️⃣ «Чебурашка 2» (29%) 2️⃣ «На деревню дедушке 2» (17%) 3️⃣ «Холоп 3» (17%) 4️⃣ «Последний богатырь. Колобок» (15%) 5️⃣ «Ангелы Ладоги» (14%) 6️⃣ «Сказка о царе Салтане» (12%) 7️⃣ «Буратино» (10%) По 9% набрали «Король и Шут. Навсегда», «Простоквашино», «Невероятные приключения Шурика» По 8% набрали «Домовенок Кузя 2», «Коммерсант» По 7% набрали «Новая теща» и «Елки 12» По 6% набрали…

🥱72🤷‍♂14😢8👀5😐5

3 Nov 2026, 08:29 UTC≈3,120 views110 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Национальные вопросы 🔹 Отношение россиян к представителям других национальностей (отличающихся от их национальности): С опаской, настороженностью – 17% Без опаски и настороженности – 78% 🔹 Наличие у россиян друзей другой национальности: Есть – 78% Нет – 21% 🔹 Если близкий родственник вступит в брак с человеком другой национальности: Одобрение – 31% Неодобрение – 12% Нейтрально – 51% ✔️ По сравнению с аналогичным …

👍58🤡32🤔12❤6✍2

2 Nov 2026, 10:40 UTC≈4,080 views117 reactionsread 7 November 2026

В прошлом году, когда певца года выбирали по другой методике (не выбор из списка, а открытый вопрос), с большим отрывом лидировал SHAMAN (Ярослав Дронов), на втором месте был Олег Газманов, и только на третьем Сергей Лазарев. При этом Полина Гагарина свою первую строчку в этом году сохранила, зато занимавшие год назад вторую и третью строчку Валерия и Лариса Долина на этот раз в список не попали.

🤡71👌23💊13🤣6💯4

2 Nov 2026, 10:27 UTC≈9,630 views239 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Певец и певица года, по мнению россиян* Певец: 1️⃣ Сергей Лазарев (20%) 2️⃣ Баста (Василий Вакуленко) (17%) 3️⃣ Григорий Лепс (16%) 4️⃣ Ваня Дмитриенко (12%) 5️⃣ Денис Майданов (12%) 6️⃣ Дима Билан (11%) 7️⃣ Стас Пьеха (9%) 8️⃣ Akmal’ (Акмаль Ходжаниязов) (9%) 9️⃣ XOLIDAYBOY (Иван Минаев) (7%) По 5% набрали Хабиб (Хабиб-Рахман Шарипов), Филипп Киркоров, Стас Михайлов и Алексей Чумаков. По 4% набрали Егор Крид и JON…

🤡154😁33🙈31👎14👍7

30 Oct 2026, 08:00 UTC≈5,150 views379 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Шестую неделю настроение россиян балансирует на отметке «50/50»: половина считает, что у окружающих преобладает тревожное настроение, другая половина – что преобладает спокойное. ❓Куда в итоге качнется маятник? 😢 – в тревожность 😎 – в спокойствие 📊 Опросы и замеры, мониторинг ФОМ

😢298😎59😁9🤡8🤷‍♂5

29 Oct 2026, 08:28 UTC≈14,900 views98 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Российское авиастроение 🔹 Сравнение российских гражданских самолетов по уровню технологий с зарубежными аналогами, по мнению россиян: 17% – российские превосходят 31% – находятся на таком же уровне 22% – российские уступают 30% – затруднились с ответом 🔹 Как изменится российское гражданское авиастроение в ближайшие 10 лет, по мнению россиян: 36% – Будет активно развиваться, Россия сможет успешно конкурировать на …

🤣67🤡12👍11🤔5💊3

28 Oct 2026, 13:50 UTC≈4,250 views107 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Украинский опрос: прислушиваться ли к требованию США прекратить удары по российским НПЗ, рискуя прекращением помощи по разведданным, старлинкам и т.д.? Все равно наносить удары – 80% Перестать наносить удары – 11% 9% затруднились с ответом 📊 Опросы и замеры, опрос КМИС

😢48👍24😡16⚡14❤5

23 Oct 2026, 06:01 UTC≈6,350 views261 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Прививочки и антипрививочники как зеркало русской демократии На примере опроса по поводу прививок можно сделать вывод, что примерно у каждого десятого россиянина вызывают неприязнь и антипатию люди, которые не разделяют их точку зрения (на картинке⬆️). Зато девять из десяти россиян антипатию и неприязнь к тем, кто считает иначе, не испытывают. ❓ У вас вызывают антипатию и неприязнь люди, которые испытывают антипат…

👎137👍76😁35🙈7🤯6

21 Oct 2026, 05:51 UTC≈10,100 views207 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Доверие институтам По мнению россиян, больше всего доверия заслуживают президент (73% ответов «вполне заслуживает доверия»), армия (69%), церковь (62%) и органы госбезопасности (61%). Меньше всего россияне доверяют таким институтам как политические партии (38%), профсоюзы (37%) и крупный бизнес (36%). Уровень доверия практически ко всем политическим институтам за год снизился (хотя и остается высоким): например, д…

🤡105😁43💊36❤13🤯10

20 Oct 2026, 16:03 UTC≈4,890 views87 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Топ-10 мемов третьего квартала 1️⃣ Вот такие дела, собачка (113,4 тысячи упоминаний) На фотографии тигр лежит в маленьком бассейне, положив лапы на бортик, а рядом стоит овчарка. Мем известен с прошлых лет, но в августе 2026-го пережил мощное возвращение. Пользователи меняли героев местами, придумывали ответ собачки, создавали нейросетевые продолжения и озвучивали сцену. Картинка стала способом подвести итог любой н…

👀43🙈22🤡13🔥5👎4

Showing the 12 most recent of 96 posts we hold for @oizmedia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@oizmedia edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
7 October 2026
Most recent edit
7 October 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

18 Jul 2026, 08:18 UTCAnonymous Poll1,370 voters approx.

Представьте, что выяснилось, будто ваш партнер в тайне от вас ведет с ИИ романтические беседы. Это измена?

  1. Да, я мужчина14%
  2. Да, я женщина7%
  3. Нет, я мужчина60%
  4. Нет, я женщина19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 96 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 42 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Аналитический центр ВЦИОМ
@WCIOMofficial · 17,273
#1
MEDIA RESEARCHES
@mediaresearchesanalytics · 17,991
#2
Опросы показывают обратное
@levada_center · 6,406
#3
Russian Field | Социология
@russian_field_soc · 13,508
#4
Валерий Фёдоров. Механизмы власти
@fedorovwciom · 7,927
#5
ФОМ
@fom_ru · 3,133
#6
PORNSTAT / статистика
@pornstat · 33,062
#7
Социо
@socio_news · 23,813
#8
РОМИР
@romir_real · 7,255
#9
Если быть точным
@tochno_st · 19,591
#10
ВЦИОМ-Прометей
@wciom_prometey · 2,497
#11
Демография упала
@populationdemography · 11,267
#12
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,975,816
#13
ЕЖ
@ejdailyru · 665,083
#14
Mash
@mash · 3,142,546
#15
Baza
@bazabazon · 1,557,779
#16
МИГ России
@mig41 · 477,348
#17
Кровавая барыня
@bloodysx · 1,173,373
#18
Толкователь
@tolk_tolk · 126,363
#19
РБК. Новости. Главное
@rbc_news · 914,536
#20
Медуза — LIVE
@meduzalive · 1,117,673
#21
Осторожно, новости
@ostorozhno_novosti · 1,620,397
#22
Коммерсантъ
@kommersant · 295,215
#23
Readovka
@readovkanews · 2,013,643
#24
ТАСС
@tass_agency · 569,224
#25
Банкста
@banksta · 439,674
#26
КОНТЕКСТ
@kontext_channel · 865,494
#27
Пул N3
@dimsmirnov175 · 331,274
#28
Colonelcassad
@boris_rozhin · 751,554
#29
BRIEFLY RU
@brieflyru · 99,249
#30
Банки, деньги, два офшора
@bankrollo · 461,756
#31
SVTV NEWS — Либертарианское СМИ
@svtvnews · 112,450
#32
НЕЗЫГАРЬ
@russicaru · 418,537
#33
КАШИН
@kashinguru · 75,113
#34
BBC News | Русская служба
@bbcrussian · 388,830
#35
Димитриев
@russ_orientalist · 129,246
#36
Милитарист
@infantmilitario · 276,039
#37
БП онлайн
@bponline · 111,499
#38
Жизнь насекомых
@insect_life · 192,670
#39
НАФИ: аналитика, исследования, прогнозы
@nafi_research · 5,865
#40
кабачковая икра по акции
@sale_caviar · 192,531
#41
Потребительское поведение; факты и тренды
@c_behavior · 8,928
#42
aavst2022
@aavst2022 · 175,279
#43
ЗеРада
@zerada1 · 423,393
#44
SOTA
@sotaproject · 103,477
#45
Антиглянец
@sncmag · 299,955
#46
Беспощадный пиарщик
@prbezposhady · 151,307
#47
Старше Эдды
@vysokygovorit · 486,171
#48
лидер мнений среди удобрений
@lider · 175,907
#49
Political Animals
@politicanimalis · 17,899
#50
Инсайт Комкон
@insight_comcon · 7,361
#51
Пездуза
@pezduzalive · 369,175
#52
The Moscow Times | Independent news from Russia since 1992
@moscowtimes_ru · 126,713
#53
ASTRA
@astrapress · 350,066
#54
Proeconomics
@proeconomics · 68,730
#55
Образ будущего
@obrazbuduschego2 · 163,954
#56
ЕЖ LAB
@ejlabru · 50,247
#57
Тибурон
@tiburon_research · 5,701
#58
Вакансии для рисёчеров. 6800 подписчиков.
@vakansii_researchers · 6,872 (as read 22 September 2026)
#59
Минута в минуту
@minutavminutu · 167,195
#60
Русский маркетинг
@smmrus · 124,993
#61
RIA_Kremlinpool
@RIAKremlinpool · 68,534
#62
Mediascope
@mediascopedata · 11,264
#63
Планёрка
@planerka_org · 48,564
#64
Агентство. Новости
@agentstvonews · 103,827
#65
ВЕДОМОСТИ
@vedomosti · 86,929
#66
низгораев
@nizgoraev2 · 3,948
#67
Екатерина Шульман
@eschulmann · 299,917
#68
Политтехнологи
@polittehnologi · 12,727
#69
Калачев-пост
@kalachevpost · 11,822
#70
Forbes Russia
@forbesrussia · 235,524
#71
СВЕЖЕСТИ
@svezhesti · 141,159
#72
The Bell
@thebell_io · 105,138
#73
Как бы Mikhail Vinogradov
@Vinogradov74 · 28,102
#74
Kotsnews
@sashakots · 469,872
#75
Kynev
@alexander_kynev · 19,567
#76
Sostav
@sostav · 56,443
#77
Александр Штефанов
@alexandrshtefanov · 204,925
#78
Минобороны России
@mod_russia · 650,358
#79
САЕАС ФОКУС
@faeasfokus · 5,225
#80
Новая газета Европа
@novaya_europe · 117,090
#81
Олег Царёв
@olegtsarov · 401,620
#82
Новая газета
@novaya_pishet · 210,961
#83
На видео видно
@navideovidno · 108,929
#84
Можем объяснить
@mozhemobyasnit · 461,557
#85
Китайская угроза
@daokedao · 98,808
#86
Политджойстик / Politjoystic ™
@politjoystic · 250,524
#87
Политика Страны
@stranaua · 334,749
#88
Fighterbomber
@bomber_fighter · 525,743
#89
Логика Маркова
@logikamarkova · 52,805
#90
Кремль. Новости
@news_kremlin · 280,233
#91
Креатив со звездочкой
@creative · 133,549
#92

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Социо
@socio_news · 23,813
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 17 September 2026
PORNSTAT / статистика
@pornstat · 33,062
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 5 September 2026
Если быть точным
@tochno_st · 19,591
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 2 October 2026
ИНФОГРАФ : Экономика и финансы
@infografo · 21,353
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Опросы и замеры” (@oizmedia), 21,754 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oizmedia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.