Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Психолог Елена Грабарь

Channel

Психолог Елена Грабарь

@psihologgrabar

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,685subscribers

+841 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001636304389
TypeChannel
Username@psihologgrabar
DescriptionДля вас про психологию. Для гармонии души и успеха в жизни. Реклама на канале: @grabrek Вопросы для разбора: @GrabarElen_bot
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held56
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/psihologgrabar

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

10,82011,69311,256.58 August 2026 — 10,844 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,843 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,839 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,840 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,833 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,828 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,820 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,882 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,884 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,880 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,878 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,875 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,866 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,860 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,856 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,839 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,837 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,913 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,906 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,904 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,902 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,848 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,915 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,032 subscribers5 September 2026 — 11,164 subscribers9 September 2026 — 11,146 subscribers11 September 2026 — 11,282 subscribers13 September 2026 — 11,280 subscribers15 September 2026 — 11,283 subscribers17 September 2026 — 11,235 subscribers19 September 2026 — 11,267 subscribers26 September 2026 — 11,365 subscribers4 October 2026 — 11,462 subscribers9 October 2026 — 11,493 subscribers13 October 2026 — 11,489 subscribers14 October 2026 — 11,487 subscribers15 October 2026 — 11,486 subscribers16 October 2026 — 11,545 subscribers17 October 2026 — 11,559 subscribers19 October 2026 — 11,558 subscribers19 October 2026 — 11,550 subscribers21 October 2026 — 11,557 subscribers22 October 2026 — 11,545 subscribers23 October 2026 — 11,548 subscribers25 October 2026 — 11,549 subscribers26 October 2026 — 11,546 subscribers27 October 2026 — 11,538 subscribers28 October 2026 — 11,536 subscribers29 October 2026 — 11,529 subscribers30 October 2026 — 11,588 subscribers31 October 2026 — 11,583 subscribers1 November 2026 — 11,585 subscribers3 November 2026 — 11,693 subscribers4 November 2026 — 11,688 subscribers5 November 2026 — 11,682 subscribers6 November 2026 — 11,685 subscribers11,6858 August 20266 November 2026
56 measurements spanning 89 days, net +841. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,689–11,824 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 56
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 06:1811,685+3
5 Nov 2026, 04:2111,682-6
4 Nov 2026, 04:3811,688-5
3 Nov 2026, 06:3611,693+108
1 Nov 2026, 07:4611,585+2
31 Oct 2026, 08:3611,583-5
30 Oct 2026, 07:3711,588+59
29 Oct 2026, 11:0611,529-7
28 Oct 2026, 12:1111,536-2
27 Oct 2026, 12:2811,538-8
26 Oct 2026, 13:1611,546-3
25 Oct 2026, 13:1611,549+1
23 Oct 2026, 11:4711,548+3
22 Oct 2026, 10:3411,545-12
21 Oct 2026, 01:0011,557+7
19 Oct 2026, 23:3411,550-8
19 Oct 2026, 00:5111,558-1
17 Oct 2026, 21:3511,559+14
16 Oct 2026, 23:0611,545+59
15 Oct 2026, 21:1911,486first reading

Engagement

79 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 44 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
31.6%
avg views ÷ 11,685 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,690
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.54%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 79 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held79 (11 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total81,171
Reactions total3,685
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 07:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
136
Videos
1
Links
10

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
11s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

13,590 reactions across 79 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5,44940.1%
❤3,95629.1%
🙏2,34217.2%
🔥1,74812.9%
💯950.699%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 79 of the 79 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,590 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 79 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
1.27%
1 of 79 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
3,950
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
3,970
over 78 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzqwzbokF121 August 202621 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 79 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 22 posts held from the last 30 days (13.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 07:01 UTC711 views4 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Знаете это чувство, когда вы вроде бы очень чего-то хотите, но... ничего не происходит? Умом понимаете, что пора меняться, строить новые отношения, запускать проект или просто начать жить по-другому. А внутри — как будто стоит блок. Голова говорит «надо», а тело отвечает «не могу» или «опасно». Я давно наблюдаю за тем, как работает эта связь между психикой и телом. И недавно открыла для себя канал Елены Петровской …

👍2🔥1🙏1

5 Nov 2026, 13:00 UTC≈2,510 views265 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🏃‍♀️Разрешение не бежать Посмотрите на свою жизнь. Скорее всего, это бесконечный марафон. Утром — подъем и сборы. Днем — работа, задачи, встречи, дети, родители, звонки, список покупок, оплата счетов. Вечером — доделать, проверить, приготовить, уложить. И так по кругу. А если вдруг выпадает свободная минута — мы чувствуем не облегчение, а тревогу. Нас начинается грызть чувство вины: «Я сижу без дела, а могла бы…»,…

👍104❤77🙏52🔥32

5 Nov 2026, 12:02 UTC≈2,580 views23 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

ВСЕГО 1 ДЕЙСТВИЕ ОТДЕЛЯЕТ ВАС ОТ ЖЕЛАЕМОГО ДОХОДА Почему одним деньги достаются легко, а другим приходится пахать ради каждой копейки? И дело далеко не всегда в опыте, знаниях или количестве рабочих часов. • Работаете много, а свободных денег никогда нет • Бесконечные непредвиденные расходы • Боитесь поднять цены на свои услуги, хотя стоите дороже • Прошли кучу обучений, а доход стоит на одном уровне Можно бесконе…

👍11❤6🔥4🙏2

5 Nov 2026, 10:03 UTC≈2,590 views237 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

М. Балинт о внутреннем мире пограничных пациентов: цитата, которая всё объясняет Известный психиатр и психоаналитик Михаэль Балинт однажды очень точно описал то, что происходит внутри человека с пограничной организацией личности. Вот как он сформулировал их глубинные ожидания от близких: «Все значимые люди должны меня поддерживать и безусловно любить. При этом у них самих не должно быть никаких своих интересов. Мо…

👍111❤77🙏49

5 Nov 2026, 09:04 UTC≈2,770 views34 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

💝 ОН / ОНА БУДЕТ ИСКАТЬ ВСТРЕЧИ С ТОБОЙ Если любимый человек ушёл, игнорирует тебя или сказал, что между вами всё кончено - не спеши ставить точку. 💛Я помогу подобрать ритуал именно под твою ситуацию, а не дам шаблонный ответ. 🕯Возвращаю любимых. ❤️‍🩹Убираю соперниц и соперников. 🦋Помогаю сохранить семью. 🤩Белые ритуалы без греха. 🕯Белый ритуал, без греха Напиши, что произошло между вами. Чем подробнее ты опишешь с…

🔥20❤13🙏1

2 Nov 2026, 19:04 UTC≈3,900 views317 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Синдром самозванца С точки зрения нейробиологии, синдром самозванца — это не сбой в системе, а вполне логичный механизм самоконтроля. Когда мы сомневаемся в себе, мозг просто проводит внутренний аудит. Эволюционно это механизм социальной безопасности: лучше промолчать и не опозориться, чем ляпнуть глупость и потерять одобрение племени. По разным оценкам, до 82% людей хотя бы раз в жизни сталкиваются с этим состояни…

👍134❤91🔥56🙏36

2 Nov 2026, 15:02 UTC≈3,990 views31 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

У меня есть один грешок: я очень люблю покупать умные книжки, красиво ставить их на полку... и не читать. Потому что после рабочего дня или в выходные осилить 500 страниц классики - это подвиг, на который просто нет сил. Но иногда так хочется поддержать светскую беседу, блеснуть эрудицией или просто понять, что там происходит в этом нашумевшем романе. Недавно нашла канал Как есть литература - и это просто находка д…

🙏25❤6

28 Oct 2026, 10:05 UTC≈4,030 views291 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Какая мысль помогает вам успокоиться и почувствовать поток жизни? Такие мысли часто пролетают в голове за секунды — автоматически, неосознанно. Важно их отловить, осознать и положить в свою копилку саморегуляции. Я делю мысли-опоры на два вида: про внутренний мир и про внешний. 🔸 Внутреннее, духовное, смысловое «В данный момент я проживаю опыт. Могу дышать, чувствовать, видеть. Я живая. И это главное». 🔸 Внешнее,…

👍123🔥83❤57🙏28

28 Oct 2026, 09:01 UTC≈4,180 views12 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Вы уверены, что хорошо себя знаете? Вот несколько неприятных сюрпризов Привычка за 21 день - миф. Первая любовь может влиять на следующие отношения спустя много лет. А гороскоп, который подозрительно точно вас описал, вовсе не обязательно «попал». И у каждой из этих вещей есть вполне земное объяснение. С мифом про 21 день получилось особенно забавно. Знаменитые «21 день» появились благодаря наблюдениям пластическо…

❤10💯1🔥1

28 Oct 2026, 08:02 UTC≈4,220 views290 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Нелюбимая дочь: саммари книги Пэг Смит Книга о том, как эмоциональная холодность матери может сломать жизнь дочери — и как найти силы исцелиться. Актуальна, к сожалению, до сих пор. Кому читать · Женщинам, чьё детство прошло под знаком эмоционального пренебрежения. · Тем, кто живёт с вечным чувством вины и ощущением «недостаточно хороша». Главные выводы 1️⃣ Эмоциональное пренебрежение формирует установку: «Я не …

👍124🔥80❤58🙏28

28 Oct 2026, 07:00 UTC≈4,140 views22 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Хочу порекомендовать канал, который сама читаю с удовольствием — «Опять книги? 📚 С точки зрения психологии это очень честный и здоровый пример того, как человек относится к своему увлечению без токсичного перфекционизма❤️ Автор не строит из себя эксперта, не давит «обязательно к прочтению» и не продаёт курс по скорочтению. Она просто показывает, как покупает книги быстрее, чем успевает их читать, начинает, бросает,…

🙏15❤7

27 Oct 2026, 15:19 UTC≈4,080 views274 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Почему он так поступил? Главный вопрос, который мы задаём не тому адресату Это самый частый вопрос на консультациях. И в нём есть горький парадокс: человек поступает с вами плохо, а вы вместо того, чтобы уйти или дать жёсткий отпор, сидите и мучительно размышляете: почему? И начинается внутренний монолог: — Может, у него детская травма? — Может, его самого в детстве не любили? — А вдруг я просто неправильно всё пон…

👍112❤89🙏57💯16

Showing the 12 most recent of 79 posts we hold for @psihologgrabar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 3 posts on @psihologgrabar as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
11 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
12 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
4 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

Алла Милютина. Инвестиции и финансы
@alla_milyutina · 17,595
1 post
Баг в голове
@bug_in_head · 302
1 post
ДАР ФЕНИКСА
@dar_fenixa · 16,298
1 post
Наталья Чайкина. Свидание с мозгами
@datebrains · 9,500
1 post
Нагуглила карьеру
@dreamcatchme · 27,729
1 post
Глушко печатает.. Детская психология
@glyshkopsy · 18,098
1 post
Валера Гут | Ψ и AQ
@gutvaleriy · 29,762
1 post
Краснова Анна | Гештальт-терапевт.
@krasnova_anna_ps · 8,569
1 post
Анна Курманова | йога-наставник
@kurmanna · 3,253
1 post
• Хамичковый синдром •
@life_and_moments · 720
1 post
Михаил | Психолог Психотерапевт
@mihail_psiholog · 10,528
1 post
Мила Скалкина | Неправильные Отношения
@milacouples · 874
1 post
nikitin.pro
@mntypes · 2,659
1 post
Жизнь после с Олесей Френк
@olesyafrenk · 8,945
1 post
АРТУР ПАНФИЛОВ. Психолог о женском.
@panfilove_psiholog · 8,520
1 post
АСП
@scagency · 2,089
1 post
Психология Отношений с Софией. А
@sofiapsiho · 9,853
1 post
Мать, без паники! Сейчас разберемся 😌
@son_verho · 1,785
1 post
Tarot By Karolina
@tarot_bykarolina · 4,321
1 post
TIMUR & SOUL • PSYCHE
@timursoul · 10,886
1 post
К. Ветрицкая — Кризисный психолог
@vetrickaya · 13,034
1 post
НЕДВИЖИМОСТЬ Москвы от Марины Воскресенской
@Voskres_agent · 1,119
1 post
Shigina | Без подвигов
@withoutheroics · 241
1 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

୨୧ wonyoung diets
@dietswonyoung · 20,579
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 36 here — alongside 35 others — read 29 September 2026
типичная анорексичка 2015
@tipichnayaanorexiaa · 88,582
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 36 here — alongside 35 others — read 7 September 2026
рпп - это моя жизнь
@anorppexia · 25,259
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 36 here — alongside 35 others — read 14 September 2026
исчезновение
@exhaustionr · 21,100
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 32 here — alongside 31 others — read 30 September 2026
косточки 🦴
@anorexia_bones · 20,865
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 36 here — alongside 35 others — read 26 September 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Психолог Елена Грабарь” (@psihologgrabar), 11,685 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psihologgrabar.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.