Канал №1 для тех, кто звонИт, а не звОнит!
Реклама — @manson_rek
Реклама через биржу: https://telega.in/c/Lingvaa
РМ: @Spiral_Miya
РКН: https://clck.ru/3GLvAv
Created
9 September 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
29 measurements spanning 32 days, net -912. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 137,505–138,691 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Sept 2026, 07:00
137,642
-74
4 Sept 2026, 10:16
137,716
-47
3 Sept 2026, 00:34
137,763
-32
2 Sept 2026, 01:52
137,795
-37
31 Aug 2026, 23:57
137,832
-24
31 Aug 2026, 02:27
137,856
-31
29 Aug 2026, 23:46
137,887
-34
28 Aug 2026, 23:25
137,921
-29
28 Aug 2026, 00:43
137,950
-31
27 Aug 2026, 00:36
137,981
-35
26 Aug 2026, 00:15
138,016
-34
25 Aug 2026, 00:06
138,050
-28
23 Aug 2026, 14:46
138,078
-38
22 Aug 2026, 00:58
138,116
-24
20 Aug 2026, 16:58
138,140
-39
19 Aug 2026, 14:34
138,179
-28
18 Aug 2026, 15:54
138,207
-47
17 Aug 2026, 16:58
138,254
-37
16 Aug 2026, 08:46
138,291
-38
14 Aug 2026, 18:56
138,329
first reading
Engagement
197 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 86 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.32%
avg views ÷ 137,642 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,940
161 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.20%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
161
of 197 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 September 2026
Posts held
197 (3 August 2026 – 8 September 2026)
Views total
957,090
Reactions total
21,031
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Sept 2026, 04:17 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,310
Videos
≈20
Links
≈4,680
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
54s
Average length
27s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
26,514 reactions across 197 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
13,972
52.7%
😁
7,436
28.0%
❤
2,711
10.2%
🤔
2,395
9.03%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 197 of the 197 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26,514 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 197 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 8 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 197 we hold a reading for · 0.5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Lingvaa. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 197 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 8 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Без вести / безвести — как правильно?
Многие ошибочно принимают сочетание за наречие, но на самом деле это предлог с существительным «весть» в родительном падеже.
Кстати, если перед вами существительное и предлог, то слово «какой-либо» без проблем встает между ними: «пропал без какой-либо вести».
#поспорим
Лингвист
Почему «сморчки» так называются? 🍄🟫
Версия, которая возникает при виде этого гриба, как ни странно, наиболее вероятная. Название сморчка действительно родственно глаголу «сморгать», то есть «извергать из носу мокроту», как писал Даль.
Макс Фасмер видел эту идею куда более состоятельной, чем мнение, что сморчок называется так из-за сморщенной шляпки.
#интересное
Лингвист
Гроте́ск
В изначальном смысле так называют художественный приём, в основе которого лежит странное и причудливое сочетание реальности и сказочности, красоты и кошмара, мудрости и безумия.
Термин происходит от французского слова grotesque, что переводится как «причудливый» или «комичный».
В общем, если увидите на картинах сюжеты с участием фантастических существ — призрачных чудовищ, полулюдей-полуживотных, грифонов…
Исчерпа́ть / исче́рпать — как правильно?
Наиболее правильный вариант — с ударением на последнем слоге. Именно его фиксирует в качестве основного «Большой орфоэпический словарь…» Каленчук и Касаткиных.
Ударение в личных формах этого глагола тоже падает на «а»: исчерпáл, исчерпáла, исчерпáли. С ударением на последний слог произносится и образованное от глагола деепричастие: исчерпáв.
#поспорим
Лингвист
Хладнокровие - главное качество харизмы
Когда на любые провокации человек реагирует спокойно, одной фразой, вместо долгих прений, ставит на место и выглядит уверенно в общении даже с опытным манипулятором
Во времена СССР этому учили лучших агентов Кремля, а теперь знания доступны в канале «глубина души»
Там рассказывают как отучить мозг реагировать на раздражители, как успокоиться, когда вас выводят на конфликт и …
Как появилось слово «облапошить»? 🤔
Одна из версий происхождения заключается в том, что слово образовано от французского lapoche — «карман». В этом смысле облапошить — это украсть или «стянуть» из кармана.
По другой теории, слово является исконно русским словом, однокоренным к слову «лапа». Ведь мы называем лапой не только конечность животного, но и руку человека (чаще всего с негативным смыслом).
#интересное
Лин…
Старение – самая опасная болезнь
Мозг человека может оставаться ясным до 120 лет, но из-за вредной еды, недосыпа и сидячего образа жизни люди превращаются в развалин уже к 50 годам.
🌱 Чтобы повернуть биологические часы вспять и всегда оставаться здоровым, читайте канал Основы жизни – там узнаете:
– Как по запаху изо рта определить скрытые болезни?
– Как без таблеток избавиться от 99% возрастных недугов?
– Какое уп…
🤔12❤4👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 197 posts we hold for @Lingvaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 37 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 197 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 8 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Где твои манеры? • Этикет @etiketmaneri · 76,883 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 19 August 2026
Русский язык | Грамотность @ruGrammar · 121,528 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
Грамотная речь | Саморазвитие @gramotnaya_rech · 173,876 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 12 August 2026
Умный Брокколь | Грамотность @brokoledu · 43,191 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 28 August 2026
Лексикона | Образование @lexicona · 285,926 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 11 August 2026
Приступ вежливости @etiquette_pv · 29,780 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 8 September 2026
Записки редакторки @zapiski_redaktorki · 94,599 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 August 2026
Правила приличия I Саморазвитие @prav_etiketa · 43,454 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 28 August 2026
Учитель русского | Русский язык @teacherus · 34,824 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 3 September 2026
Русские пословицы | Правописание @pos_lov · 40,655 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 30 August 2026
Дневник Академика Павлова | Саморазвитие @academicpavlov · 114,850 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 14 August 2026
Real English. Таня Маркова @bk_gko · 44,835 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 August 2026
Мане или Моне? @maneormone1 · 86,092 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 18 August 2026
Простым языком @prostyazikom · 38,683 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 31 August 2026
Ещё главу и спать | Литература @knigi_literatura · 261,824 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 August 2026
Поэзия полу́ночи | Литература @midnight_poetry · 39,729 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 30 August 2026
Во вкусе не откажешь @vo_vkus · 59,837 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 22 August 2026
Мысли великих | Литература | Саморазвитие @mysli_literature · 66,197 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 21 August 2026
Вечная философия @tim_philosophy · 67,863 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 August 2026
Мудрые строки @mudr_str · 85,150 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 18 August 2026
МУДРЫЙ ВЕК | ФИЛОСОФИЯ @tsitaty_mudroe_slovo · 36,665 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 1 September 2026
Психология манипуляций @manip_psychology · 39,553 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 30 August 2026
body_ianguage @body_Ianguage · 1 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 25 August 2026
Основы жизни @life_osnov · 101,898 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 39 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Лингвист” (@Lingvaa), 137,642 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Lingvaa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.