Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ноотропы и Биохакинг | RISE

Channel

Ноотропы и Биохакинг | RISE

@mind_rise

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

39,231subscribers

-363 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001111571829
TypeChannel
Username@mind_rise
Created23 October 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mind_rise

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

39,23139,59439,412.56 August 2026 — 39,594 subscribers6 August 2026 — 39,583 subscribers7 August 2026 — 39,561 subscribers8 August 2026 — 39,563 subscribers9 August 2026 — 39,553 subscribers10 August 2026 — 39,535 subscribers11 August 2026 — 39,521 subscribers12 August 2026 — 39,516 subscribers13 August 2026 — 39,506 subscribers14 August 2026 — 39,493 subscribers16 August 2026 — 39,479 subscribers17 August 2026 — 39,474 subscribers18 August 2026 — 39,454 subscribers19 August 2026 — 39,447 subscribers20 August 2026 — 39,433 subscribers21 August 2026 — 39,418 subscribers23 August 2026 — 39,404 subscribers24 August 2026 — 39,388 subscribers25 August 2026 — 39,382 subscribers26 August 2026 — 39,359 subscribers27 August 2026 — 39,352 subscribers28 August 2026 — 39,347 subscribers29 August 2026 — 39,338 subscribers30 August 2026 — 39,335 subscribers31 August 2026 — 39,331 subscribers1 September 2026 — 39,323 subscribers2 September 2026 — 39,316 subscribers5 September 2026 — 39,321 subscribers9 September 2026 — 39,297 subscribers11 September 2026 — 39,259 subscribers13 September 2026 — 39,243 subscribers15 September 2026 — 39,231 subscribers6 August 202615 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 40 days, net -363. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 39,177–39,648 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 08:5739,231-12
13 Sept 2026, 14:5939,243-16
11 Sept 2026, 18:4139,259-38
9 Sept 2026, 06:2039,297-24
5 Sept 2026, 22:1839,321+5
2 Sept 2026, 15:3639,316-7
1 Sept 2026, 14:4939,323-8
31 Aug 2026, 17:4839,331-4
30 Aug 2026, 19:2839,335-3
29 Aug 2026, 19:0439,338-9
28 Aug 2026, 20:5839,347-5
27 Aug 2026, 21:1539,352-7
26 Aug 2026, 20:3339,359-23
25 Aug 2026, 22:5539,382-6
24 Aug 2026, 21:5639,388-16
23 Aug 2026, 05:2739,404-14
21 Aug 2026, 16:3639,418-15
20 Aug 2026, 14:3439,433-14
19 Aug 2026, 16:3539,447-7
18 Aug 2026, 15:4239,454first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 76 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.06%
avg views ÷ 39,231 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,560
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.811%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 September 2026
Posts held26 (25 July 202611 September 2026)
Views total39,110
Reactions total317
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Sept 2026, 21:28 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
34s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

496 reactions across 22 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
15230.6%
👍12926.0%
🔥12926.0%
custom 5256240290343164789387.66%
🤔306.05%
🥰91.81%
🤯61.21%
🎉20.403%
💊10.202%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 534 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 11 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Sept 2026, 08:44 UTC≈1,880 views18 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Photo

ПАРАКСАНТИН — ПОТЕНЦИАЛЬНАЯ АЛЬТЕРНАТИВА КОФЕИНУ? Параксантин сегодня рассматривают как одно из веществ, которое может поддерживать концентрацию без избыточной стимуляции. Причём для организма это не экзотика. После кофеина около 70% вещества метаболизируется именно в параксантин. Он тоже взаимодействует с аденозиновыми рецепторами и обладает стимулирующим действием. Самое интересное начинается в исследованиях на лю

11👍7

9 Sept 2026, 07:49 UTC≈2,370 views4 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Photo

Берите готовый стек для мозга и убегайте! У Nooteria labs сейчас актуальна акция, в которой вы можете получить набор «Продуктивность» бесплатно. В набор входят: MindBooster PRO — для концентрации, внимания и продуктивной работы; B-комплекс «Актив форте» — для поддержки энергетического обмена и нервной системы; Омега-3 PRO — источник ЭПК и ДГК для ежедневной поддержки мозга; Ежовик Гребенчатый Extra — для поддержки к

4

8 Sept 2026, 09:13 UTC≈2,780 views40 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Video

Я МЕСЯЦ ТРЕНИРОВАЛ МОЗГ ПО СИСТЕМЕ КАВАШИМЫ Кто-то раскрашивает картины по номерам, а кто-то я. Заказал себе еще в июле вот эту книжечку. Это система профессора Рюты Кавашимы, которая нацелена на тренировку мозга. Из Гугла🖥Японская система тренировки мозга профессора Рюты Кавашимы основана на простых ежедневных упражнениях, которые активируют префронтальную кору. Просто так решать примеры мне было неинтересно, я в

👍27🔥92🤔2

4 Sept 2026, 07:02 UTC≈3,530 views24 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Photo

МЕСЯЦ С GOOGLE FITBIT AIR Мне 32, сидячая работа за компом, три раза в неделю тренируюсь и очень любою фитнес-браслеты, поэтому Fitbit Air месяц практически не снимал, спал с ним, бегал, ходил в зал и сравнивал показатели с другими моими устройствами. Если коротко, Fitbit Air — это браслет Google без экрана. Он круглосуточно собирает данные о пульсе, активности, сне, а потом передаёт их по Bluetooth в приложение Goo

🔥117👍6

2 Sept 2026, 05:17 UTC≈3,480 views13 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Photo

Решил продолжить вчерашнюю тему и вдогонку накидать ещё мыслей, как итог. Креатин — это, конечно, прикольно, но если нужен реальный эффект, я бы рассматривал хорошие ноотропные комплексы, которые работают и быстро, и накопительно. Ещё один плюс таких комплексов в том, что раньше бы собирали огромные стеки для продуктивности, а теперь всё есть в одной банке. Что я постоянно принимаю сам и что однозначно рекомендую?

👍84🥰1

1 Sept 2026, 04:32 UTC≈3,980 views61 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Photo

КРЕАТИН КАК НООТРОП: Я НЕ СПАЛ 21 ЧАС, ЧТОБЫ ПРОВЕРИТЬ, РАБОТАЕТ ЛИ ОН Креатин я принимал раньше для тренировок, думаю, и вы тоже его принимали. А когда начали появляться исследования о его влиянии на когнитивные функции, решил проверить отдельно именно как ноотроп. Не агитирую, делюсь опытом :) Для чистоты эксперимента взял обычный моногидрат. 5 г ежедневно утром, 30 дней. Взял такую дозировку на базе одного любопы

24🔥18custom 525624029034316478912👍7

28 Aug 2026, 07:10 UTC≈3,980 views35 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Photo

ВОЗЬМИ ЭТО С СОБОЙ НА ВЕЧЕРИНКУ Американский бренд UNDO Gummies придумал конфету, которую нужно принимать до или во время употребления алкоголя. В составе дигидромирицетин (DHM), расторопша, магний, цинк, витамин B12 и электролиты. Задача продукта — снизить интоксикацию. Но внимание привлекает не только состав, одна порция помещается в компактный плоский пакет, который визуально напоминает упаковку презерватива. Т

17🤔11👍6💊1

26 Aug 2026, 08:34 UTC≈4,170 views55 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Photo

6 минеральных вод: какую я выбираю для ЖКТ, а какую не стал бы пить каждый день Я долго относился к минералке как к обычной воде с газом, а недавно попробовал курс Donat Mg и довольно быстро понял ошибку, что выраженная минерализация влияет на пищеварение ощутимее, чем кажется. Иногда настолько, что приходится срочно корректировать дозировку. Собрал краткий гайд по открытым материалам и этикеткам производителей. Сост

👍3016custom 52562402903431647896🔥3

24 Aug 2026, 08:41 UTC≈4,100 views17 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Photo

Мицелий лучше сухого Ежовика? Я бы так не упрощал Когда я впервые выбирал Ежовик логично предполагал, что мицелий технологичнее, значит, должен работать лучше. Потом я начал читать составы и понял, что важнее смотреть на способ обработки и стандартизацию сырья. Иначе можно месяц принимать капсулы, потратить деньги и так и не понять, был ли в них нужный объём активных веществ. Порошок сухого плодового тела — это про

9🤔5🔥2🎉1

21 Aug 2026, 11:05 UTC≈4,140 views25 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Photo

БИОХАКИНГ ДОБРАЛСЯ ДО КОТОВ 🐈 У бренда Pet Honesty появилась любопытная новинка — не просто лакомство, а кремовое пюре с лососем и компонентами для поддержки спокойного состояния кошки. В составе — L-триптофан и L-теанин. Первый служит прекурсором серотонина, второй — аминокислота, которую используют в формулах для поддержки расслабления. Формат особенно интересен на фоне общего тренда: добавки для питомцев всё бол

custom 52562402903431647899🔥8🤯61🎉1

18 Aug 2026, 05:42 UTC≈4,700 views25 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Photo

Мой текущий стек на каждый день Я снова собрал добавки в одну понятную схему, потому что банки постепенно начали захватывать кухню, а я уже не помню, что и зачем принимаю. Сейчас отобрал пять позиций и тестирую их повторно, чтобы понять, какой стек сделать постоянным. Утром — Ежовик. В моем 1200 мг экстракта мицелия и 360 мг бета-глюканов. Я выбираю экстракт вместо порошка плодового тела, потому что для меня это не

👍155custom 52562402903431647895

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @mind_rise. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Jul 2026, 08:36 UTCAnonymous Poll515 voters

В чём, на ваш взгляд, секрет долголетия?

  1. качественный сон71%
  2. продуманный стек15%
  3. регулярные силовые и аэробные тренировки56%
  4. контроль массы тела и кардиореспираторной формы50%

The shares total 192%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 11 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

БИОХАКИНГ И НООТРОПЫ | АНДРЕЙ АРБЕНИН 🅰️
@andreyarbenin · 24,565
#1
Neural Hack
@neuralhacking · 11,491
#2
Нейромицелий
@neuromycelium · 6,047
#3
Ефименко про биохакинг
@efimen_colife · 4,295
#4
Дом Биохакинга
@hbiohacking · 617
#5
BioGuru
@bioxakeri · 1,401
#6
Максим БАДовик | здоровье без хаоса
@badovik · 1,649
#7
BIOMACHINE
@bmchn · 175,961
#8
National Biohacking😎
@NationalBiohackingg · 1,085
#9
CleverMind
@CleverMindRu_Official · 28,595
#10
BIO X
@japaneseqs · 592
#11
Antistress Diet - психология, нутрициология, фитнес
@antistressdiet · 951
#12
MENTOR MIND🖤
@mentor_mind_ru · 3,761
#13
MycoWiki • Грибная Википедия
@mycowiki · 2,182
#14
Биохакинг? Ну типа
@onlybiohuckingshit · 1,360 (as read 15 September 2026)
#15
Limar freedom
@fr33domchannel · 14,467
#16
FUCK BADs
@fuckbads · 5,143
#17
[[PRO Obsidian]]
@obsidianrus · 9,223
#18
Salvus channel
@salvus_channel · 8,678
#19
Семенцев - Биохакинг
@sambiohacking · 6,028
#20
IGORVIGOR
@IGORVIGOR_TG · 1,544
#21
Проснулся позавчера
@dima_skrudzh_2 · 1,352
#22
Белый биохакинг
@men_biohacker · 4,031
#23
Hacking Bio | Оптимизация жизни и долголетие 🧬
@hckng_bio · 3,055
#24
Second Brain 🗃
@second_brain_ru · 4,357
#25
Смешная жаба
@bufopentinus · 1,148
#26
Dzari
@DrDzari · 267,941
#27
Эксплойт
@exploitex · 2,040,418
#28
RationalAnswer | Павел Комаровский
@RationalAnswer · 107,560
#29
Denis Sexy IT 🤖
@denissexy · 137,170
#30
Бэкдор
@whackdoor · 1,602,305
#31
Артемий Лебедев
@temalebedev · 969,646
#32
Rozetked
@rozetked · 657,046
#33
Ivan Limarev / Merlin AI
@LimarevIvan · 12,229
#34
Дизраптор
@disruptors_official · 72,845
#35
Сиолошная
@seeallochnaya · 79,553
#36
эйай ньюз
@ai_newz · 96,845
#37
Хабр
@habr_com · 132,415
#38
Банки, деньги, два офшора
@bankrollo · 454,378
#39
ЗеРада
@zerada1 · 425,503
#40
Хулиномика
@hoolinomics · 99,011
#41
vc.ru
@vcnews · 111,970
#42
Глеб Соломин 🚀 24.05.2025
@gleb_solomin · 59,607
#43
Тёмная сторона / Темнографика
@temno · 79,772
#44
r/ретранслятор
@retra · 165,480
#45
MarketTwits
@markettwits · 336,138
#46
Daily Reminder
@justakindreminder · 36,693
#47
Стартап дня. Александр Горный.
@startupoftheday · 60,247
#48
Малоизвестное интересное
@theworldisnoteasy · 74,007
#49
Ваня Замесин
@zamesin · 50,185
#50
Scammers
@scamsociety · 365,050
#51
Нейротипология
@misliglubzhe · 10,562
#52
Грокс
@groks · 43,106
#53
Сэрж Фаге о XXI Веке
@SergeXXI · 4,466
#54
kyrillic
@kyrillic · 61,091
#55
Рустам Агамалиев: "нечтение" и заметковедение
@zettelkasten_ch · 5,404
#56
AI Happens
@aihappens · 14,503
#57
artjockey
@artjockey · 82,333
#58
DEFI Scam Check
@Defiscamcheck · 48,658
#59
Roman Ovcharóv
@ovcharovblog · 29,887
#60
Не баг, а фича
@bugnotfeature · 1,039,946
#61
Machinelearning
@ai_machinelearning_big_data · 280,944
#62
FEDOR BORSHEV
@pmdaily · 23,770
#63
EVALITE.Superfood
@evalitesuperfood · 5,108
#64
Блюм | Академия здоровья
@blumcentre · 4,442
#65
Итак, это Панов
@itakblet · 24,951
#66
Осознанная Меркантильность | Антон Назаров
@m0rtymerr_channel · 80,182
#67
Не баг, а фича
@bugfeature · 576,653
#68
Brotherhood
@brotherhood_channels · 2,048
#69
Иван Халилов ДЛЯ СВОИХ🔥
@ivankhalilov · 76,567
#70
Продакты не нужны
@betternotworse · 28,521
#71
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,971,982
#72
Двач
@dvachannel · 938,781
#73
Антонов такой Антонов
@auantonov · 321,727
#74
Банкста
@banksta · 438,196
#75
Код.ру
@d_code · 403,034
#76
addmeto
@addmeto · 71,846
#77
SVTV NEWS — Либертарианское СМИ
@svtvnews · 113,005
#78
Фичизм
@fichism · 25,400
#79
Фининди | Александр Елисеев
@Finindie · 72,860
#80
e/acc
@cryptoEssay · 62,639
#81
Упал, поднялся — блог Славы Рюмина
@ruminblog · 63,354
#82

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

БИОХАКИНГ И НООТРОПЫ | АНДРЕЙ АРБЕНИН 🅰️
@andreyarbenin · 24,565
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 15 September 2026
CleverMind
@CleverMindRu_Official · 28,595
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 15 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ноотропы и Биохакинг | RISE” (@mind_rise), 39,231 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mind_rise.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.