✔یادداشتهای تاریخی و دینی
👈نشر مطالب تحقیقی و پژوهشی بدون ذکر منبع شرعا
جایز نیست.
#ایستگاه_اندیشه
اگر ایراد و اشکالی در مطالب مشاهده نمودید با کمال میل
پذیرای انتقادات شما خواهیم بود.
Created
Between 1 October 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
59 measurements spanning 91 days, net -290. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,137–32,620 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 10:54
13,109
+2
4 Nov 2026, 12:46
13,107
+4
3 Nov 2026, 14:08
13,103
-14
2 Nov 2026, 14:15
13,117
-3
1 Nov 2026, 13:28
13,120
-1
31 Oct 2026, 11:08
13,121
+10
30 Oct 2026, 09:40
13,111
-2
29 Oct 2026, 11:46
13,113
+11
28 Oct 2026, 11:11
13,102
+9
27 Oct 2026, 09:36
13,093
+7
26 Oct 2026, 06:10
13,086
+12
25 Oct 2026, 05:01
13,074
+3
24 Oct 2026, 06:26
13,071
+3
23 Oct 2026, 07:35
13,068
+4
22 Oct 2026, 05:41
13,064
+3
20 Oct 2026, 22:39
13,061
+6
19 Oct 2026, 22:06
13,055
-12
18 Oct 2026, 20:01
13,067
+10
17 Oct 2026, 19:07
13,057
+14
16 Oct 2026, 20:38
13,043
first reading
Engagement
134 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.3%
avg views ÷ 13,109 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,350
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
22
of 134 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held
134 (3 August 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total
29,669
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Nov 2026, 18:38 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,050
Videos
≈549
Links
≈829
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2h 52m
Average length
10m 07s
Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 22 posts held from the last 30 days (4.55%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🏆ترجمه فارسی کتاب موازین الکلام
🟥کل مطالب این کتاب مورد تایید نمیباشد و نقدهایی بر برخی مطالب وارد است که در مطالب بعد به استحضار اعضا خواهد رسید.
بصورت منطقی، استناد به تعدادی از اخبار علاجیه و مرجحات منصوص، صحيح نمیباشد. علاوه بر دور باطل، مشکلات دیگری نیز در این روش وجود دارد که در مطالب بعدی به صورت مشروح ارائه میگردد.
❌@negahiinou
🏆سنگ نوشتهای از زید بن حسن بن علی بن ابی طالب علیهمالسلام در منطقه حرزة
🟥متن سنگنوشته : آمن زيد بن حسن بالله وحده لا شريك له وشهد ألا إله إلا الله وحده وأن محمدا عبده ورسوله على ذلك يحيى ماحيي وعليه يموت إذا مات وهو يسأل الله أن يقربه من محمد في الآخرة كما قربه منه في الدنيا ...
❌@negahiinou
✔️تا پیش از مطالعه و بررسی این مقاله، خودم نیز به صحت این دعا (دعای ۲۷ ام صحیفه سجادیه) اعتماد داشتم و چند ماه پیش مطلبی با استناد به آن در همین کانال منتشر کرده بودم. پس از بازنشر یادداشت اخیر ازین کانال، یکی از دوستان بهدرستی پرسید: «چگونه چند ماه پیش به این دعا استناد میکردی و اکنون در انتساب آن تردید میکنی؟»
پاسخم این بود که انسان در مسیر آموختن است و قرار نیست باورهای دیروزمان، ما را از بازنگری در آنها بازدا…
پیوست
.
پس از انتشار یادداشت «خونآشامان و امام سجاد(ع)»، یکی از اساتید، دو قرینهٔ تکمیلی در تأیید تاریخگذاری متأخر دعای مرزداران مرحمت فرمودند، که بازنویسی آن تقدیم میگردد:
دو قرینهٔ مهم دیگر نیز، تعلق این دعا به عصر عباسی (و عدم امکان صدور آن در سدهٔ نخست هجری) را آشکار میسازد:
۱- در بخشی از دعا، راهبرد برخورد با کفار در قالب یک دوگانهٔ قطعی (مرگ/اسارت یا پذیرش اسلام) بیان شده است: «قتلا في أرضك وأسرا، أو يقرو…
✔️ابویعلی حمزة بن عبدالعزيز سلار دیلمی (م ٤٤٨ ه) و #خمس
🟥او مینویسد: بر هیچ کس جایز نیست در چیزی از خمس تصرف کند مگر به اذن امام، و هر کس با اجازه امام تصرف کند، چهار پنجم از آنرا استفاده کند و خمس آن برای امام است و در این دوران [غیبت امام]، امام حلال کرده است که ما تصرف کنیم و این تنها به خاطر اکرام و برتری بخشی به ما بوده است. (ظاهرا ابویعلی روایاتی در اختیار داشته که در آن امام علیهالسلام سهم خویش از خمس را ب…
🏆اعتقاداتی که همدیگر را نقض میکنند
🟥در میان باورهای دینی، گاهی میتوان نمونههایی یافت که افراد یا گروههایی همزمان به عقایدی باور دارند که در اصل، یکدیگر را نقض میکنند. این پدیده معمولاً از ناآگاهی، برداشت سطحی از مفاهیم دینی، یا تأثیر باورهای فرهنگی و تاریخی بر اندیشهی دینی ناشی میشود.
در چنین حالتی، فرد ممکن است از نظر ذهنی تصور کند که به مجموعهای منسجم از باورها پایبند است، در حالیکه در عمق ماجرا، برخی از…
(ادامه از فرسته قبل)
.
... جغرافیاییِ دشمنان است.
حضورِ ملموس و همزمانِ اسلاوها (سقالبه) در جبهههای شمالی و غربی (روم) و دیلمیان در طبرستان، دقیقاً بازتابدهندهٔ دغدغههایِ استراتژیکِ خلافت در عصر هارونالرشید است. در این بازهٔ زمانی، از یکسو نبردهای سنگینی با امپراتوری بیزانس و همپیمانان اسلاوِ آنها در مرزهای روم جریان داشت، و از سوی دیگر شورشها و درگیریهای مستمری در مرزهای خراسان و طبرستان با دیلمیان و ترکان…
«دعای خونآشامان و امام سجاد(ع)»
.
سند صحیفه سجادیه بر اساس معیارهای علم رجال شیعه، فاقد اعتبار و بسیار ضعیف ارزیابی میشود. تمامی طُرُقِ متعددِ نقل در دورههای متأخر، نهایتاً به یک حلقهٔ مشترک یعنی «متوکل بن هارون بلخی» و فرزندش ختم میشود که هر دو کاملاً «مجهول» هستند. علاوه بر این مهم، سند صحیفه، دچار گسست تاریخی و انقطاعِ فاحشِ طبقات (افتادگی راویان) است. همچنین، حضور افرادی متهم به جعل همچون «ابوالمفضل شیبانی» د…
✔️پرسش از چیزهایی که پاسخش زیانبار است! (۲)
👈در ادامهی این نوشتار
🟥رسول اکرم صلواتاللهعلیهوآله فرمودند: همواره، این عشیرهی قريش در امان باشند تا خويشاوندان کافر را از دینشان بازگردانند.
مردی برخواست و گفت: ای پیامبر خدا! من بهشتیام یا جهنمی؟
فرمود: تو در بهشتی.
سپس دیگری برخواست و گفت: من بهشتیام یا جهنمی؟
فرمودند: تو در جهنمی.
سپس فرمودند: در آنچه من ساکت ماندم، شما هم ساکت باشید و اگر نبود که همدیگر را دف…
✔️همهٔ این کتابها فقط برای فهمیدن یک کتاب واحد (تصویر از صفحه اینستاگرامی یکی از علمای اهل سنت)
🟥اگر همهٔ این نوشتهها، شرحها، تفسیرها و اختلافنظرها قرار است ما را به فهم یک کتاب واحد برسانند، آیا این پرسش دربارهٔ همهٔ ادیان صادق نیست؟
البته روشن است که مسائل مستحدثه و پرسشهای تازهٔ هر عصر، به بررسی، اجتهاد و پاسخهای جدید نیاز دارند؛ اما آیا این مسائل، حتی بخش قابلتوجهی از این حجم عظیم کتابها را تشکیل میدهند…
Signed م.سلطانی
Showing the 12 most recent of 134 posts we hold for @negahiinou. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@negahiinou edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
17 August 2026
Most recent edit
23 August 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @negahiinou as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
7 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
7 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
28 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
نقد تخصصی تشکیلات بهایی و بیان مختصر در موضوع مهدویت @naghdbahaiat · 3,319#83
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
بنیاد شهید مطهری @motahari_ir · 20,486 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 27 September 2026
کتابخانه اسلامی و تصوف @erfaneeslami1 · 19,489 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 3 October 2026
️اذکار @owjishirazi · 19,823 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 30 September 2026
دروغ ها و خرافات ملحدین @Zandiq_IQ7 · 19,425 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 1 October 2026
امام مهدی عج @emammahdi · 32,668 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 5 September 2026
طب سنتی سورنا @sorenanews · 21,860 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 21 September 2026
حامد کاشانى @kashani1395 · 41,499 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 30 August 2026
مدرسه علوم انسانی @zistboommedia · 32,679 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 5 September 2026
پروکسی هوشمند | Smart Proxy @Tw_pl · 98,936 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 2 September 2026
دفتر آیت الله تبریزیان @DaftareAyatollahTabrizian · 152,497 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“شیعه پژوهی” (@negahiinou), 13,109 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/negahiinou.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.