Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Moloday | Снижение биологического возраста

Channel

Moloday | Снижение биологического возраста

@recipes_prozdorovie

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

23,802subscribers

-702 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001906223319
TypeChannel
Username@recipes_prozdorovie
DescriptionРКН: Заявление № 7196303621 По вопросам рекламы info@pro-zdorov
CreatedBetween 1 March 2023 and 31 January 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/recipes_prozdorovie

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 3 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@MolodayHealth/62375 Aug 2026, 11:41 UTC@recipes_prozdorovie/5951 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 11:42 UTC1.00under a minute
@MolodayHealth/62466 Aug 2026, 08:13 UTC@recipes_prozdorovie/5960 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 08:18 UTC1.005 minutes
@MolodayHealth/62486 Aug 2026, 11:38 UTC@recipes_prozdorovie/5962 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 11:44 UTC1.007 minutes
@MolodayHealth/62556 Aug 2026, 14:48 UTC@recipes_prozdorovie/5969 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 14:50 UTC1.002 minutes
@MolodayHealth/62566 Aug 2026, 17:06 UTC@recipes_prozdorovie/5970 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 17:10 UTC1.005 minutes
@MolodayHealth/62587 Aug 2026, 06:27 UTC@recipes_prozdorovie/5972 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 06:31 UTC1.005 minutes
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@MolodayHealth10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.005 minutes@MolodayHealth (10–0)
@pro_nytriciolog10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minuteeven
@molodayproduct10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (7–3)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 15 of the 18 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 10 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 4, the earliest publisher we hold is @MolodayHealth. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 3 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

23,80224,50424,1537 August 2026 — 24,504 subscribers7 August 2026 — 24,504 subscribers8 August 2026 — 24,492 subscribers9 August 2026 — 24,477 subscribers10 August 2026 — 24,455 subscribers11 August 2026 — 24,446 subscribers12 August 2026 — 24,429 subscribers12 August 2026 — 24,406 subscribers14 August 2026 — 24,385 subscribers15 August 2026 — 24,357 subscribers17 August 2026 — 24,334 subscribers18 August 2026 — 24,313 subscribers19 August 2026 — 24,292 subscribers20 August 2026 — 24,270 subscribers21 August 2026 — 24,250 subscribers22 August 2026 — 24,219 subscribers24 August 2026 — 24,195 subscribers25 August 2026 — 24,182 subscribers26 August 2026 — 24,171 subscribers27 August 2026 — 24,152 subscribers28 August 2026 — 24,142 subscribers28 August 2026 — 24,124 subscribers30 August 2026 — 24,108 subscribers31 August 2026 — 24,075 subscribers1 September 2026 — 24,055 subscribers2 September 2026 — 24,044 subscribers3 September 2026 — 24,025 subscribers5 September 2026 — 23,991 subscribers8 September 2026 — 23,942 subscribers11 September 2026 — 23,916 subscribers13 September 2026 — 23,898 subscribers14 September 2026 — 23,883 subscribers16 September 2026 — 23,865 subscribers19 September 2026 — 23,849 subscribers25 September 2026 — 23,802 subscribers7 August 202625 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 49 days, net -702. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,697–24,609 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 11:1723,802-47
19 Sept 2026, 01:5723,849-16
16 Sept 2026, 16:1723,865-18
14 Sept 2026, 20:1623,883-15
13 Sept 2026, 09:1823,898-18
11 Sept 2026, 11:4123,916-26
8 Sept 2026, 17:1723,942-49
5 Sept 2026, 13:1823,991-34
3 Sept 2026, 12:3924,025-19
2 Sept 2026, 03:1324,044-11
1 Sept 2026, 00:1624,055-20
31 Aug 2026, 00:2624,075-33
30 Aug 2026, 00:2824,108-16
28 Aug 2026, 22:3424,124-18
28 Aug 2026, 01:1424,142-10
27 Aug 2026, 01:5924,152-19
26 Aug 2026, 03:5824,171-11
25 Aug 2026, 07:2224,182-13
24 Aug 2026, 10:0624,195-24
22 Aug 2026, 17:0824,219first reading

Engagement

121 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.54%
avg views ÷ 23,802 subscribers
Avg views / post
367
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.546%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 121 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 29 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 September 2026
Posts held121 (5 August 2026 – 8 September 2026)
Views total10,631
Reactions total15
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Sept 2026, 01:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,690
Videos
≈264
Links
≈1,020

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
22m 33s
Average length
1m 02s

Measured directly from 22 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

40 reactions across 26 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2870.0%
👍820.0%
🔥410.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 121 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 40 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 121 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
64.5%
78 of 121 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
78
posts carrying an erid · 64 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
322
over 78 measured posts
Median views · rest
278
over 43 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFHVbmSR831 August 20268 September 2026
2W5zFHBoaaM331 August 20262 September 2026
2W5zFHru98V36 August 202610 August 2026
2W5zFG4XQxH25 August 20268 August 2026
2W5zFGjUcNV211 August 202612 August 2026
2W5zFGrj8mF26 August 20269 August 2026
2W5zFFwoTPF115 August 202615 August 2026
2W5zFG8z4g9124 August 202624 August 2026
2W5zFG9KD3o122 August 202622 August 2026
2W5zFGAkrLh128 August 202628 August 2026
2W5zFGBu1bo117 August 202617 August 2026
2W5zFGDWjVT128 August 202628 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it. 52 further tokens are held for this entry and not listed here.

Measured over the 121 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

8 Sept 2026, 11:13 UTC770 viewsread 28 September 2026
Advertisementerid 2W5zFHVbmSRPhoto

Посмотрели эфир и сразу открыли свои анализы?😅 А дальше начинается: что значит этот показатель, почему здесь звёздочка, а это точно норма и нужно ли уже переживать? Не нужно гуглить каждый показатель отдельно и пытаться самостоятельно собрать из десятков цифр общую картину. Загрузите имеющиеся результаты анализов в MOON🌙 и расскажите ей о своём самочувствии, питании, сне и привычках. MOON — помощник по здоровью и …

8 Sept 2026, 09:06 UTC553 viewsread 28 September 2026
Video

МЫ УЖЕ В ЭФИРЕ 🔴 Разбираем, какие показатели в анализах нельзя игнорировать, когда достаточно наблюдения, а когда уже стоит обратиться к врачу. Если Вы часто думаете: «вроде всё нормально, просто усталость», «это возраст», «так у всех» — возможно, стоит посмотреть на ситуацию внимательнее. Подключайтесь к эфиру 👇 https://vkvideo.ru/video-184740134_456244484

8 Sept 2026, 08:46 UTC497 viewsread 28 September 2026
Photo

⏰ ЧЕРЕЗ 15 МИНУТ НАЧИНАЕМ! Какие показатели в анализах действительно требуют внимания? Когда достаточно наблюдения, а когда визит к врачу лучше не откладывать? Уже через 15 минут разберём всё на прямом эфире 🧪 🔴 Не пропустите — ссылку на эфир отправим через 15 минут!

8 Sept 2026, 05:19 UTC421 viewsread 28 September 2026
Photo

🚨 «АНАЛИЗЫ ВРОДЕ НОРМАЛЬНЫЕ» — ФРАЗА, ИЗ-ЗА КОТОРОЙ МОЖНО ПРОПУСТИТЬ ВАЖНЫЕ СИГНАЛЫ Получили результаты, увидели, что почти всё укладывается в референсы лаборатории, — и спокойно закрыли файл. А точно ли этого достаточно? 👀 Некоторые изменения в анализах требуют внимания, даже если Вы пока чувствуете себя привычно и ничего особенно не беспокоит. И наоборот: одна цифра, вышедшая за референс, ещё не означает, что н…

7 Sept 2026, 17:54 UTC413 viewsread 28 September 2026
Advertisementerid 2W5zFHVbmSRPhoto

Жизнь в большом городе может влиять даже на микробиоту кишечника 🏙️ Кофе на бегу, доставка, перекусы вместо полноценного обеда, мало овощей и клетчатки — знакомый городской ритм? А питание напрямую связано с составом кишечной микробиоты. Исследования показывают: рацион с большим количеством минимально обработанных продуктов связан с более высоким разнообразием микробиоты, а ультрапереработанная пища — наоборот. Д…

7 Sept 2026, 11:17 UTC398 viewsread 28 September 2026
Advertisementerid 2W5zFHVbmSRPhoto

Не знаете, какие анализы Вам нужно сдать? 🧪 Необязательно искать готовые чек-листы в интернете, самостоятельно составлять огромный список и сдавать всё подряд «на всякий случай». Если Вы не знаете, с чего начать, спросите у MOON 🌙 Расскажите ей свой возраст, что Вас беспокоит, как Вы себя чувствуете, как питаетесь и спите, какой образ жизни ведёте и какие результаты анализов уже есть. MOON поможет систематизирова…

7 Sept 2026, 11:06 UTC319 viewsread 28 September 2026
Poll

Когда вы в последний раз сдавали анализы?🤔

  1. Недавно 😊71%
  2. Больше года назад🫢14%
  3. Давно, не знаю какие нужно сдать анализы именно мне🫠14%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Sept 2026, 10:58 UTC383 views2 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Photo

КАКИЕ АНАЛИЗЫ И В КАКОМ ВОЗРАСТЕ СТОИТ ПРОВЕРЯТЬ? 🧪 В 20 кажется, что о чек-апах можно задуматься когда-нибудь потом. В 30 начинаешь присматриваться к показателям. А после 40 список обследований действительно постепенно меняется. Но есть важный момент: не существует универсального списка «сдать всё раз в год» для каждого человека. Возраст — только один из ориентиров. На то, что и как часто стоит проверять, влияют …

❤2

6 Sept 2026, 15:57 UTC427 viewsread 28 September 2026
Advertisementerid 2W5zFHVbmSR

В детстве воскресенье — это мультики и «можно ещё полежать». Во взрослом возрасте — стирка, уборка, продукты и мысль: «Как завтра уже понедельник?» 😅 Но хочется оставить в этом дне хотя бы немного места для себя. Например, завести несколько воскресных ритуалов: — неспешно позавтракать, а не есть на бегу; — выйти на прогулку без цели набрать 10 000 шагов; — отложить телефон хотя бы на час; — устроить домашний уход…

6 Sept 2026, 14:27 UTC415 viewsread 28 September 2026
Advertisementerid 2W5zFHVbmSR

Ну что, признавайтесь: отсыпались сегодня за всю неделю? 😴 Легли попозже, отключили будильник и решили: «Всё, сегодня сплю, пока сама не проснусь»? 😅 Но бывает и так: проспали 9–10 часов, а ощущения, что наконец восстановились, всё равно нет. Усталость остаётся, днём снова хочется прилечь, а к вечеру сил уже ни на что. И тогда дело может быть не только в количестве сна. Постоянная сонливость и усталость — повод п…

5 Sept 2026, 15:46 UTC463 viewsread 28 September 2026
Advertisementerid 2W5zFHVbmSRPhoto

А ДЛЯ ЧЕГО ВЫ ПЬЁТЕ БАДЫ? 💊 Чтобы оставаться молодой? Поддержать кожу и волосы? Стать энергичнее? Лучше спать? Или просто потому, что «все сейчас что-то принимают»? 😄 Знакомая ситуация: одну банку посоветовала подруга, вторую увидели у блогера, третью купили «на всякий случай». И вот дома уже целая полка, а вопросов только больше: — что из этого действительно нужно именно Вам? — что можно принимать вместе? — подх…

5 Sept 2026, 09:11 UTC384 views2 reactionsread 28 September 2026

Мы поделились своими идеями — теперь Ваша очередь! Показывайте, что было у Вас на завтрак 😍🍳 Скидывайте фото завтраков в комментарии 👇 Красивые и не очень, полезные и «сегодня можно всё»😂 Посмотрим, чем сегодня завтракает наш канал 💙

❤2

Showing the 12 most recent of 121 posts we hold for @recipes_prozdorovie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 14 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Sept 2026, 11:06 UTCAnonymous Poll7 voters

Когда вы в последний раз сдавали анализы?🤔

  1. Недавно 😊71%
  2. Больше года назад🫢14%
  3. Давно, не знаю какие нужно сдать анализы именно мне🫠14%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Sept 2026, 04:40 UTCAnonymous Poll9 voters

Понимаете ли вы, что написано в ваших анализах?🤔

  1. Понимаю ☺️22%
  2. Смотрю на отклонения🤗44%
  3. Гуглю все показатели 📲56%
  4. Не понимаю вообще ничего 🥲0%

The shares total 122%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

2 Sept 2026, 06:45 UTCAnonymous Poll5 voters

Как ваш ребенок пережил первый день школы?🎒

  1. С радостью побежал 🥰60%
  2. Сильно устал 😩0%
  3. Капризничал вечером 😓0%
  4. Тяжело встал утром 🥲40%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

20 Aug 2026, 06:19 UTCAnonymous Poll18 voters

Вам трудно засыпать? Лезут тревожные мысли?

  1. Да44%
  2. Нет56%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

20 Aug 2026, 06:19 UTCAnonymous Poll17 voters

Просыпаетесь уже уставшими?

  1. Да65%
  2. Нет35%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

20 Aug 2026, 06:19 UTCAnonymous Poll18 voters

Вы испытываете судороги, «зажатость» в теле, подергивание мышц?

  1. Да39%
  2. Нет61%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 121 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

MOLODAY
@molodayproduct · 149,552
#1
Moloday | Активное долголетие
@pro_nytriciolog · 14,841
#2
Женское здоровье
@pro_womanhealthy · 7,186
#3
Нутрициология на экспертном уровне. Эксперт - Анастасия Лежнина
@lezhnina_as · 3,870
#4
Интегративный нутрициолог | Pro-Здоровье
@nutriciolog_pro · 8,131
#5
Формула здоровья
@pro_formula · 4,687
#6
Ирина Гейкало блог
@nutriciologira · 1,930
#7
Влада Исаченко
@vlada_nutriciolog · 854
#8
Путешествие к здоровью🍀
@PPutkzdorovyu · 1,210
#9
NutriПИТАНИЕ
@nutripitanie · 3,813
#10
Клуб нутрициологов
@miin_ankz · 50,066
#11
Leonov chef
@leonovchef · 51,444
#12
Не идеальный нутрициолог 😜
@nenutriciolog · 2,246
#13
ВкусноПолезно с GetFit
@vkusnogetfit · 6,185
#14
G.D_wellness
@gdwellness · 12,329
#15
Алла, крестная мать биохакинга
@alla_dietolog · 13,158
#16
Нутри-жизнь вашей еды🌻
@nutriEZ · 397
#17
Здравомыслие в еде
@zdravomislievede · 31,536
#18
Ешь. Сияй. Люби.
@nutriciologekatehod · 2,811
#19
Ксения Машкина
@dr_mashkina · 74,991
#20
#ПП рецепты, Нутрициология, Аюрведа и мой опыт
@pitanie_recept · 1,577
#21
Разум Тело и Еда
@razumteloeda · 67,979
#22
Еда имеет значение
@eda_imeet_znachenie · 1,379
#23
Нутрициолог Безбадова
@bezbada · 505
#24
О еде и не только 🌿
@nutriciolog_mari · 408
#25
Ирина Фаритова | Нутритерапевт 🇬🇧 CNM | коуч 🇺🇸 IIN
@faritova_nutrition · 11,148
#26
Что-то на полезном
@napoleznom · 10,286
#27
МАЛЫШ ЦУКИНИ
@zucchinibaby · 354
#28
🍓ECO DAY🥑нутрициолог Дарья Москалёва
@ecodayy · 4,849
#29
Ксения Пустовая
@k_pustovaya · 7,383
#30
Женское здоровье
@pro_zhenskoe_zdorovie · 21,211
#31
Дарья Кораблева о здоровье
@korableva_prohealth · 11,138
#32
Хелс-коуч Легран | ваш нутрициолог
@healthcoach_Legran · 5,108
#33
Алия: ППолезные рецепты (бывший Happy_sweets_aliya)
@happy_sweets_aliya · 12,558
#34
napp_mari
@napp_mari_tg · 9,873
#35
Оазис Здоровья
@pr_dadali · 86,883
#36
Dr_Nutri_mila
@nutri_mila · 4,358
#37
Кухня Леонова/Еда для красоты и здоровья
@cook_21 · 12,155
#38
Руслан Масгутов
@rusmasgutov · 144,017
#39
PRO питание и БАДы | Диляра Лебедева гастроэнтеролог
@stomach_lebedeva · 63,479
#40
НутриМама
@nutrimother · 11,575
#41
Клуб поддержки нутрициологов и специалистов ЗОЖ
@nutritionist_club · 2,051
#42
ПП рецепты: без глютена, лактозы и сахара
@rita_aip · 6,023
#43
Нутрициология с Екатериной Марковой
@markovanutriciologiya · 14,713
#44
detsdoc | здоровье & Remee+
@detsdoc · 59,048
#45
КЕТО, LCHF, CARNIVORE ДИЕТЫ
@ketotg · 104,622
#46
ЗОЖИГАЙ С ЛЕОНОВЫМ
@leonov_food · 8,314
#47
Инна Павлова | ЗОЖ без фанатизма
@neurogastro_impulsive · 3,909
#48
MOLODAY|здоровье в любом возрасте
@MolodayHealth · 28,976
#49
ВЫЗЫВАЙТЕ ПЕДОРИЧ
@annapenutri · 2,123
#50
Инна Павлова | чек-ап мыслей
@neurogastro · 1,206
#51
Доктор Зубарева / Doctor Zubareva
@doctor_zubareva · 402,924
#52
Биохимия с Сабиной
@biochemistrymedic · 2,626
#53
Леся о еде и здоровье
@lesya_nutrition_blog · 336
#54
Высшее нутрициологическое
@evdokimova_nutri · 12,315
#55
Нутрициолог Ольга Романова
@dobryi_nutriciolog · 554
#56
Kat.cooking.diary
@katcookingdiary · 9,107
#57
Академия Нутрициологии
@nsa_academy · 63,486
#58
Панасюк Николай
@getfit_nutrition · 70,835
#59
CNM
@cnmrus · 5,828
#60
МАН Нутрициология
@man_academyofnutrition · 33,003
#61
Annacooks | детские веган рецепты
@annacooksdiary · 9,490
#62
Ирина Шиманская Holistica
@tibetdoc · 79,570
#63
Метаболическое здоровье 🌱 Наталья Кузнецова
@ja_v_forme · 1,870
#64
Тренер с мозгами
@lusaveleva · 478
#65
Эндокринолог Магеря
@magerya · 288,728
#66
Александра Могучая. Умный фитнес
@moguchaya_fit · 1,799
#67
SashaBewell🥑
@sasha_bewell_gastro · 2,319
#68
Nature’s Sunshine
@naturessunshine_25 · 15,417
#69
Гастроэнтеролог Ольга Помойнецкая
@olga_pomoynetskaya · 251,971
#70
Надя Андреева - нутрициолог об энергии
@shkolasvetlyachkov · 45,493
#71
Доктор Виктория Орлинская
@cardiodokstories · 161,534
#72
УОМ
@uom_education · 16,441
#73
Матрица здоровья | УОМ
@uom_nutrifirst · 9,461
#74
Доктор Анна Читанава
@annacheeta · 33,816
#75
Суханова Елена 🫜 биофанат
@hellenhappy_channel · 10,248
#76
lutsenkoapproved.ru
@lutsenkoapprovedru · 880
#77
PRO гормоны и БАДы | Диляра Лебедева эндокринолог
@lebedeva_dilyara · 135,059
#78
Диана Шаронова - ГенОм
@igenom · 14,514
#79
УПДН | Университет диетологии и питания
@shkola_dietologov · 20,473
#80
УНИВЕРСИТЕТ НУТРИЦИОЛОГИИ
@munn3begining · 5,414
#81
Дадали В.А. Школа здоровья
@putkzdoroviyu · 31,794
#82
Николай Панасюк | Нутрициология | GetFit
@nikolay_panasiuk · 37,204
#83
ВЕБИНАРЫ МИИН
@miin_beauty · 6,209
#84
Марина Кимпицкая | Питание | Здоровье
@Kimpitskaya · 11,809
#85
Vegansearth
@vegansearth · 35,767
#86
Нескучный ВЕЛНЕС
@happywellness · 77,392
#87
Олеся Ревеко | Нутрициолог
@olesya_reveko1 · 43,041
#88
Helena Kornilova / Елена Корнилова
@helenkornilova · 182,842
#89
👩‍🎓Академия здоровья семьи Кондаковых
@akademi_practic_nutrition · 3,889
#90
Дарья Ермишина
@dr_ermishina · 16,030
#91

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 17 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

MOLODAY
@molodayproduct · 149,552
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026
БОСФОРОВНА КЛУБ
@bosforovna · 60,728
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 9 September 2026
Leonov chef
@leonovchef · 51,444
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
Разум Тело и Еда
@razumteloeda · 67,979
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 August 2026
PRO питание и БАДы | Диляра Лебедева гастроэнтеролог
@stomach_lebedeva · 63,479
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 August 2026
Оазис Здоровья
@pr_dadali · 86,883
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 17 August 2026
МИФИМ ИНСТИТУТ НУТРИЦИОЛОГИИ
@zubareva_onlinee · 20,362
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 27 September 2026
Ксения Машкина
@dr_mashkina · 74,991
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 August 2026
Руслан Масгутов
@rusmasgutov · 144,017
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 August 2026
ПП десерты | Кристина Озерова
@kriozerova · 27,355
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 September 2026
КЕТОРЕЦЕПТЫ
@bombones_tuyos · 31,968
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 5 September 2026
MOLODAY|здоровье в любом возрасте
@MolodayHealth · 28,976
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 17 September 2026
Доктор Зубарева / Doctor Zubareva
@doctor_zubareva · 402,924
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
Я себя НЕ знаю · Здоровье
@Ya_Sebya_NE_Znayu · 23,507
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 September 2026
КЕТО, LCHF, CARNIVORE ДИЕТЫ
@ketotg · 104,622
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 15 August 2026
Олеся Ревеко | Нутрициолог
@olesya_reveko1 · 43,041
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 August 2026
Клуб нутрициологов
@miin_ankz · 50,066
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 August 2026
Здоровье с Екатериной Новиковой
@katerina_dietolog · 50,481
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 25 August 2026
EatClean | ПП РЕЦЕПТЫ И МЕНЮ
@eatclean_menu · 84,954
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 August 2026
ПП рецепты
@avokado_xudeet · 95,292
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 16 August 2026
Школа Здоровья врача Ольги Помойнецкой
@health_club_drPomoinetskaya · 22,088
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 21 September 2026
Гастроэнтеролог Ольга Помойнецкая
@olga_pomoynetskaya · 251,971
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 August 2026
Николай Панасюк | Нутрициология | GetFit
@nikolay_panasiuk · 37,204
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 1 September 2026
Vegansearth
@vegansearth · 35,767
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026

This channel appears in 41 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Moloday | Снижение биологического возраста” (@recipes_prozdorovie), 23,802 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/recipes_prozdorovie.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.