Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net +362. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 38,301–39,750 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 09:18
39,583
+54
16 Sept 2026, 19:16
39,529
+40
14 Sept 2026, 21:20
39,489
+61
13 Sept 2026, 04:19
39,428
+100
11 Sept 2026, 04:57
39,328
+168
8 Sept 2026, 06:16
39,160
+193
4 Sept 2026, 23:59
38,967
+100
3 Sept 2026, 10:25
38,867
+62
2 Sept 2026, 06:28
38,805
+57
1 Sept 2026, 03:38
38,748
+32
31 Aug 2026, 02:04
38,716
+35
30 Aug 2026, 00:47
38,681
+16
29 Aug 2026, 03:43
38,665
+28
28 Aug 2026, 02:39
38,637
+35
27 Aug 2026, 05:12
38,602
+32
26 Aug 2026, 02:35
38,570
+23
25 Aug 2026, 03:48
38,547
+44
23 Aug 2026, 22:54
38,503
+35
22 Aug 2026, 03:55
38,468
-339
20 Aug 2026, 17:04
38,807
first reading
Engagement
52 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 82 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
25.9%
avg views ÷ 39,583 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,300
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.59%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 52 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 September 2026
Posts held
52 (15 July 2026 – 18 September 2026)
Views total
215,290
Reactions total
3,424
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
20 Sept 2026, 10:29 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,490
Videos
≈731
Links
≈3,200
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
13s
Average length
13s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
6,051 reactions across 52 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 99.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
6,047
99.9%
👎
4
0.066%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 52 of the 52 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,051 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 18 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
3.85%
2 of 52 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
5,130
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
10,600
over 50 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VSb5xSe2KL
1
24 July 2026
24 July 2026
2Vtzqw3uz4s
1
25 August 2026
25 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 18 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Девятка на весах. Мне хватило суток, чтобы начать её терять.
99.4кг первый раз за восемь лет.
Я ждал этот момент несколько месяцев и заготовил себе красивую реакцию. Встать. Выдохнуть. Почувствовать, как внутри что-то торжественно щёлкает. Объявить себе, что я молодец. Может, даже кулак сжать — по-мужски, сдержанно, но с достоинством. Восемь лет всё-таки, имею право на кулак.
По факту я постоял, посмотрел на цифру…
Отличная новость, коснётся каждого.
https://t.me/gobizness/3519
Есть дети - будет проще найти места на парковке.
Нет детей? Будет сложнее, место не найдёшь и поедешь домой детей делать...
Кстати, подпишитесь на этот канал — там новости, которые касаются каждого.
«Вода + взвешивание недели»
Сколько воды пить на самом деле (спойлер: не «всем по 2 литра»)
«Пей 2 литра в день» — фраза, которую слышали все и никто не проверял. Откуда она? Из старой рекомендации, которую вырвали из контекста: там имелась в виду вся жидкость, включая ту, что в еде — супах, фруктах, овощах, чае. А не восемь стаканов чистой воды сверху.
Как по-человечески:
🔹 Ориентир — примерно 30 мл на кг веса. П…
📏 #Практика — Что делать на следующий день после переедания: четкий план действий при срыве
Вчера был праздник, встреча с друзьями или просто минутная слабость, и вы сильно переели. Утром на весах плюс два килограмма. В голове паника и желание наказать себя голодом или трехчасовой тренировкой. Стоп! Это худшее, что можно сделать.
Большая часть утреннего привеса — это не жир, а вода, которую задержали углеводы и сол…
Иногда достаточно одной фразы, чтобы всё изменилось.
Кто-то похлопает по плечу: «Не переживай, у нас всё получится».
Кто-то встряхнёт: «Вставай. Мечта сама себя не сбудет».
Канал «Мотивация» — это тот голос, который нужен тебе именно сегодня.
Каждый день. Коротко. По делу.
Подписывайся 👉 https://max.ru/motivator762
🥑 #Питание — Разбор продуктовой корзины автора: что всегда лежит в моем холодильнике
Когда люди слышат про похудение на 27 кг, они представляют унылую грудку на пару и сухую гречку. Но мой холодильник выглядит совсем иначе. Секрет долгосрочного результата — в разнообразии и вкусе.
Я не покупаю «специальные диетические» продукты. В моей корзине всегда простые, цельные ингредиенты, из которых можно быстро собрать сыт…
🧬 #Физиология — Фазы похудения: почему вес уходит ступеньками и как пережить плато
Вы держите дефицит, а стрелка весов уже неделю стоит на месте. Начинается паника: «Диета не работает!». Но физиология устроена иначе: жир не уходит плавно каждый день. Часто вес падает ступенями из-за так называемого эффекта Whoosh.
Когда жировые клетки опустошаются, организм временно заполняет их водой, чтобы сохранить объем. Вы худ…
❌ #ЛичныйОпыт — Мой худший срыв: как я набрал обратно 5 кг и как остановил этот занос
Думаете, после того как я разобрался в физиологии, мой путь был идеально ровным? Как бы не так. Мой худший срыв случился на фоне сильного стресса по работе. Я перестал взвешивать еду, забросил активность и за два месяца вернул назад 5 кг.
В этот момент легко скатиться в самобичевание, решить, что «всё кончено», и набрать остальные…
🏃♂️ #Движение — Время для тренировок: «У меня нет времени» — разбираем 15-минутные экспресс-комплексы
«У меня нет 2 часов на спортзал» — отличный предлог, чтобы вообще ничего не делать. Но для поддержания тонуса и здоровья мышц дорогой абонемент в зал не нужен.
Научные исследования показывают, что три короткие 15-минутные тренировки в неделю приносят до 80% той же пользы для здоровья и метаболизма, что и долгие из…
🥑 #Питание — Заменители сахара: вредны ли они? Разбор исследований о стевии и аспартаме
«Сахарозаменители вызывают рак, портят кишечник и обманывают мозг!» — пугают нас заголовки в интернете. Давайте отбросим страшилки и обратимся к науке.
Современные сахарозаменители (аспартам, стевия, эритрит) — это самые изученные вещества в пищевой индустрии. ВОЗ и FDA признают их безопасными. Чтобы получить хоть какой-то вред …
🧬 #Физиология — Сон и жиросжигание: как дефицит сна блокирует выработку соматотропина
Вы можете идеально считать калории и пахать в зале, но если вы спите по 5 часов в сутки, жир будет уходить со скрипом. И дело тут не в лени, а в гормонах.
Ночью, во время глубоких фаз сна, вырабатывается соматотропин — гормон роста. Это мощнейший жиросжигатель. Он помогает организму восстанавливать ткани и расщеплять жировые запас…
🧠 #Психология — Отношения с едой: как избавиться от чувства вины за «запрещенку»
Съели кусок пиццы или плитку шоколада, а потом полночи ругаете себя и обещаете завтра отрабатывать это в зале? Знакомо. Я годами жил в этом цикле: жесткий запрет — неизбежный срыв — грызущее чувство вины — наказание голодом.
Еда — это не поле боя. Не существует «плохой» и «хорошей» еды, есть лишь баланс калорий. Чувство вины заставляет…
👍167
Showing the 12 most recent of 52 posts we hold for @pohuditel2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@pohuditel2 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@budnivoinaaa named in 2 posts, 19 August 2026 – 20 August 2026 · confirmed gone 25 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Ничего лишнего 👌 @nutritionbalance · 875 (as read 31 August 2026)#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 31 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Злой доктор Филатов @doc_Filatov · 28,121 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 September 2026
Будем здоровы @bzdorov · 441,257 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
🍤🍱 « ХУДЕЕМ БЕЗ ХИМИИ » 🍕🍗 @Hud_met · 23,254 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 18 September 2026
☙ Анна Савина ❧ @AnnaSavina_1 · 29,962 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 7 September 2026
Мотивация Хозяина Судьбы @hozyainsudby · 24,688 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 15 September 2026
ПП Рецепты | Здоровое питание @ppreceptiki · 113,325 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 14 August 2026
Рецепт по фигуре @recept_po_figure · 45,354 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 27 August 2026
СТРОЙНАЯ: Питание| Упражнения @dieta5blog · 23,740 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 17 September 2026
Создай Себя | Саморазвитие @fitnessamorazvit · 24,304 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 16 September 2026
Хитрости Дизайна @hitrosti_dizaina · 26,246 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 12 September 2026
ПП рецепты🍏 @pprcpt · 33,741 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 4 September 2026
Эффективный человек @effective_official · 44,159 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 28 August 2026
Про Финансовую Грамотность @Pro_FinGram · 47,538 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 26 August 2026
Рецепты ПП: правильное питание @ppfoodrecept · 44,685 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 28 August 2026
Диетические рецепты. Правильное питание @dietrecepti · 83,452 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026
Чек-листы марафоны @motionchek · 42,988 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Похудитель” (@pohuditel2), 39,583 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pohuditel2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.