The Paradox of Choice and the Contemporary Atheist https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1L38M-6zQ0A
❤27

Channel
@UmahShield
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
30,047subscribers
-477 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001555371175 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @UmahShield |
| Description | منصة متخصصة في تفكيك الشبهات العقدية والفكرية المعاصرة، وهدم الأصول الفلسفية للتيارات المنحرفة. نعتمد الوحي المعصوم ميزانًا، ومنهج السلف الصالح نبراسًا. |
| Created | 4 October 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/UmahShield |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 09:22 | 30,047 | -41 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 23:39 | 30,088 | -29 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 13:13 | 30,117 | -15 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:14 | 30,132 | -20 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 17:08 | 30,152 | -8 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 17:24 | 30,160 | -14 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:14 | 30,174 | -17 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:47 | 30,191 | -9 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:04 | 30,200 | -10 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 21:02 | 30,210 | -20 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:42 | 30,230 | -16 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 21:14 | 30,246 | -41 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:56 | 30,287 | -20 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 13:07 | 30,307 | -17 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:47 | 30,324 | -14 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 09:03 | 30,338 | -8 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 08:33 | 30,346 | -15 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:36 | 30,361 | -30 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:23 | 30,391 | -13 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 05:17 | 30,404 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 17 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
864 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 602 | 69.7% | |
| 👍 | 183 | 21.2% | |
| 👌 | 33 | 3.82% | |
| 😢 | 8 | 0.926% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 0.81% | |
| 🎉 | 7 | 0.81% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 0.81% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 0.694% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 0.579% | |
| 🤮 | 4 | 0.463% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 0.231% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 864 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 January 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The Paradox of Choice and the Contemporary Atheist https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1L38M-6zQ0A
❤27
What Is Islam Really About? A Complete Introduction https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ienHqs2OL10
❤26
How Faith Fades Across Generations https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=klx1v3b-uic
❤19👍5👌3
بين أيديكم -حفظكم الله- الحلقة الأولى من: "قصة الفتنة المعاصرة بالإمام أبي حنيفة". نفع الله بها، وبارك فيها. وأسعد بمتابعتكم وإثرائكم. https://youtu.be/XsZ84IMR0ow?si=0BvxxQBHv6Z7Sedo
👍17❤6🥰1
السلام عليكم شهر يوليو القادم سيكون شهرًا ضاغطًا من جهات متعددة؛ فهو موعد تجديد أغلب خدمات الذكاء الاصطناعي والأدوات التقنية التي نعتمد عليها في إعداد المواد، والبحث، والمونتاج، وبناء النماذج والمشاريع الدعوية التي تخدم عموم المسلمين، وتفيد طلاب العلم وأصحاب القنوات في الرد على الشبهات ونشر الخير. ويأتي ذلك بالتزامن مع حاجتنا إلى تطوير جهاز العمل الأساسي حتى نتمكن من مواصلة الإنتاج بصورة أفضل، ومع موعد الانتقال إلى م…
❤49👍10
Jabir and the Messenger: A Lesson in Responsibility and Love https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WS5rnVsJH9g
❤22
Suhaib Ar-Rumi: From Enslaved Boy to Unbreakable Hero https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qj4wdzn_WaA
❤22❤🔥7
Did the Qur’an Teach the Divinity of Christ? Refuting Michael Jones https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umm0ATvhrQE
👍13❤4
مقاطع قصيرة خفيفة لأطفالنا فيها عقائد وقيم وآداب متوفرة الآن على قناتنا للأطفال https://www.youtube.com/@ShuounKids/shorts
❤54👍2
The Terrorism They Never Talk About https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LHHj3iYSTMY
👍19❤12
أي عبث هذا بكتاب الله؟! يطل علينا يوسف أبو عواد بجرأة لا نظير لها، ينزع النبوة عن أبي البشر! يقول يوسف أبو عواد بثقة يحسده عليها الجاهل: "حتى آدم نفسه لم يكن نبياً ولا رسولاً، ولا توجد ولا آية في النص القرآني تقول إن آدم نبي ولا رسول". هذا كذب صريح على الله وكتابه. فما هو تعريف "النبي" في القرآن ولغة العرب؟ النبي هو من يوحى إليه ويُنَبَّأ بخبر السماء. فهل أوحى الله لآدم وكلمه أم لا؟ لنفتح كتاب الله ونقرأ: ﴿فَتَلَقَّى…
❤167👍41😢7👏6🤮4🥰4😁2
The Most Valuable Currency in Islam https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=usIBMl4MTT8
❤32👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @UmahShield. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 7 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 48 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“درع الأمة” (@UmahShield), 30,047 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UmahShield.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.